baldovin concept

Jocurile agresive- un simptom al societatii neosclavagiste

2012-01-06T09:39:00.000-08:00

Copilul si animalul se joaca din dorinta de a invata, de a-si perfectiona indemanarea si de a socializa. Daca ne uitam pe geneza jocului vedem ca prin joc copiii de obicei imita niste acte ale adultilor (jocul cu galetusa si lopatica i.e.). sau isi perfectioneaza anumite skiluri (sotronul- ca precizie a aruncarii pietrei i.e.). Jocul de-a soarecele si pisica sau de-a mama si de-a tata presupun proiectii personale in interiorul acestor fiinte cu care copiii se identifica si care se pregatesc sa devina pe parcursul dezvoltarii spre viata adulta. Indiferent de pulsiunile agresive, distructive, mortifere pe care copilul le proiecteaza in interiorul jocului, rolul jocului si jucariilor este foarte important pentru dezvoltarea capacitatilor sale psihice si motorii. Dar, in acest nivel, jocul copilului si animalului pastreaza o doza de inocenta in actul jocului data in special de inofensivitatea activitatii de joc.

Unii adulti si-au pastrat aceasta nevoie de a socializa prin joc sau arta. Dealtfel in limba engleza „play” inseamna si joc si a interpreta un rol ca actor sau a canta la un instrument. In limba romana, pe langa acceptiunea actoriceasca, cuvantul joc se refera si la dans popular. Numeroasele jocuri dezvoltate de societatea umana de-a lungul timpului pentru socializare si ocuparea cat mai placuta si mai relaxanta a timpului liber constituie un reper important al civilizatiei umane. Acesta s-ar putea numi aspectul inocent sau infantil al jocului la omul adult. Din pacate pe langa acest aspect exista si jocul agresiv care atesta partea urata a civilizatiei umane, mai precis ramasitele ei salbatice. Recursul la joc, sublimarea unei agresivitati foarte pronuntate in activitatea jocului presupune un adult irascibil, agresiv, amenintator si determinat sa obtina „mai mult” dintr-o activitate anume. Aceasta determinare si ambitie atat de utila capitalismului sunt de fapt simptomele unei societati care nu se poate decide daca traieste in razboi sau in pace.

Pe langa simptomele paranoide, depresive, obsesiforme etc. cunoscute aceasta agresivitate specifica societatii contemporane se sublimeaza in spectacolul consumist (circ, filme de cinema, emisuni TV, ziare de scandal) sau jocurile de noroc, jocurile sportive si jocurile video. Despre jocurile de noroc s-a scris foarte mult. Exista chiar si o forma a unei entitati nosologice din psihopatologie cunoscuta cu sub numele de „jucatorul patologic”. N-am sa insist pe ea insa ea sa regaseste in celelalte forme de joc agresiv. Cert este ca tehnologia a permis prin jocurile video aducerea cazinoului clasic in casele oamenilor. Jocurile video sunt adevarate home casino! Probabil ca la un moment dat va aparea si „jucatorul video patologic” in descrierile psihopatologiei.

Fiecare dintre jocurile agresive seamana cu adevarate scene de razboi si competitie cu diferenta ca, cel putin pe moment, nu moare nimeni si nu se incalca vreo lege. Acest detaliu le-a facut sa fie numite tot jocuri. Ele au calitatea de a exacerba elementul agresiv din interiorul fiintei umane intr-o realitate paralela fara insa a fi incriminabil. Dat fiind faptul ca societatea a invatat sa pedepseasca punerea in act a agresivitatii brute, prin recursul la jocuri aceasta se manifesta nestingherit la un nivel mai mult decat fantasmatic traditional. Jocurile online sunt adevarate „second life” pentru astfel de impatimiti. Simularea realitatii prin tehnicile computerizate se face astazi la un nivel mult mai fidel decat a reusit vreodata sa faca jocurile traditionale de socializare si arta. Pierderea identitatii celor doua realitati se intampla deseori. Folosirea de nickuri dupa care se ascund persoane reale este un imbold de eliberare fata de regulile traditionale de pedepsire a agresivitatii puse in act. Am putea vedea in aceasta situatie o invitatie a tehnologiei la dedublare a perosnalitatii. Drept urmare in interiorul comunitatii online de jucatori insultele si amenintarile cu moartea sunt la ordinea zilei. Unii jucatori online merg mai departe cu agresivitatea cautand IP ul si datele personale ale dusmanilor online in intentia de razbunare concreta in viata reala.

Dar daca ne gandim la jocurile simple ale copilariei vedem ca de fapt aceste fenomene nu mai au nimic comun cu ele. Le numim jocuri pentru ca sunt activitati neproductive care imita o realitate anume. Insa diferenta dintre copilul sau animalul inocent care se joaca simplu si gamerul cinic si agresiv transpirat si tremurand in fata calculatorului sau in fata monitorului cu consola este ca de la cer la pamant. Cu toate astea granita inocent-agresiv in jocurile adultilor este foarte neclara si multi se iau la harta din cauza jocului desi scopul lui este tocmai socializarea. Din nefericire fenomenul se intampla si la unii copii si la animalele stresate care incep a se juca dar sfarsesc in lupta si in agresarea partenerului. Sunt foarte dese fenomenele agresive in jocurile sportive practicate de adulti din ratiuni de mentinere a conditiei fizice.

Sporturile facute de profesionisti cu perseverenta si indemanare nu mai sunt jocuri in sensul clasic ci adevarate meserii. Sportivul le practica din dorinta de competitie si din nevoia de dragoste din partea fanilor. Aceasta nevoie sporita de dragoste este de fapt o incercare de acoperire cu satisfactie maternalista a acestei stari sclavagiste transmise ereditar si perpetuate la nivel educativ. Pentru asta sportivul are un program si un stil de viata care implica o foarte mare presiune si mult stres. Satisfacerea nevoii fanului infocat de victorie este motorul acestei stari. Tumultul fanilor de pe stadioane reediteaza de fapt chemarea la lupta cu care armatele isi incepeau in trecut marsul si eventual atacul. Rezultatul este acelasi: cetatea fantasmatica care este o reeditare a cetatii concrete pe care armata clasica vroia sa o cucereasca. Acolo erau alimentele, bautura si femeile. Cetatea fantasmatica cuprinde o anacliza intre cele mai puternice instincte (cel nutritiv si cel sexual) la care se adauga distractia oferita de alcoolul gasit in cetate.

Nevoia de joc sau de spectacol in general este nevoia sclavului contemporan de evadare din conditia sa umila dupa modelul stramosului sau sclavul clasic. Majoritatea jucatorilor sunt indarjiti si dornici de o revansa ce seamana izbitor cu razbunarea. Adultii le practica datorita faptului ca uneori au timpi morti si ei sunt programati sa munceasca, sa aiba o activitate. De aceea consider ca problema e anterioara contactului cu jocul si nu neaparat jocul in sine. Starea asta de hiperstenie care il face pe gamer sau suporter de echipa/club sa aiba nevoie de intrecere si experiente SF este speculata subtil de industria jocurilor care treptat va inlocui industria filmelor. Nevoia de a-si umili adversarul si de a atinge performante care sa-l ridice in ierarhia competitionala este de fapt o reeditare fantasmatica a nevoii sclavului clasic de evada din conditia sa de "demn de dispret" spre rascoala sau razboi.

Cele mai populare sporturi combina in ele dorintele primare ale omului simplu (ca sclav contemporan) urmas al sclavului clasic. In fotbal sutul de la mare distanta este un deliciu al spectatorului. Un gol marcat de la mare distanta arunca tribunele in aer si spectatorii din fata ecranelor. Un astfel de gol este selectat pentru generice ca fiind un apogeu al frumusetii in fotbal. El este mai mult decat un gol ordinar pentru ca mingea sutata de departe seamana cu un proiectil rar pe care adversarul nu il are. In acelasi timp in aceasta perceptie este amestecata si traiectoria mingii care intra in plasa si care reitereaza actul sexual unde ea este penisul iar poarta este vaginul. Cu cat mai departat este locul sutului fata de tinta cu atat mai mare pare penisul in aceasta perceptie fantasmatica a actului sexual. Invingerea rivalului prin lupta si cucerirea femelei sunt predispozitii psihice ancestrale care se regasesc in simbolul golului inscris de la distanta in fotbal, al eseului inscris de un jucator ce depaseste multi adversari in rugby sau fotbal american sau a unui cos inscris de asemenea de la mare distanta in baschet. Desi exista variatii majoritatea jocurilor sportive presupun un loc fierbinte bine aparat de adversar dar pe care jucatorul trebuie sa il atinga. Delirul de bucurie al suporterului este de fapt bucuria anaclitica a satisfacerii fantasmatice a acestor pulsiuni. Fara suporteri nu pot exista nici maestrii sporturilor, legendele si vedetele lor care sunt platite din aceasta nevoie fantasmatica de evadare in bucuria cuceririi cetatii fantasmatice.

Gamerul video este un astfel de suporter care foloseste tehnologia. Fata de sporturile clasice unde era doar spectator sau antrenor fantasmatic, in jocurile video el este si vedeta. Desi majoritatea jucatorilor nu sunt profesionisti totusi majoritatea se apropie de aceasta stare mentala deoarece punctele, scorurile si tot felul de compensatii fantasmatice iau rolul dependentei vedetei sportive de dragostea fanilor. Desi rareori insista si pe simbolurile feminine cum sunt poarta/cosul/terenul tinta in sporturi totusi jocurile video au avantajul ca creeaza scene de razboi foarte reale. Majoritatea jocurilor video sunt shootere. Cetatea fantasmatica este simulata indirect prin gradul de simulare a realitatii oferita de tehnologia contemporana. Realitatea lor nu consta neaparat in fotorealismul obiectelor 3D din jocuri (desi odata cu nextgen acestea au devenit aproape imposibil de diferentiat de cele din filme) cat mai ales posibilitatea de interactiune cu ea.

Din acest punct de vedere jocurile video au luat fata filmelor. Dupa cum filmele de mare popularitate sunt productii consumiste de punere in act a fantasmelor sclavului contemporan in acelasi fel jocurile au ajuns sa creeze o poveste care sa atraga atentia jucatorului si sa-l intarate. Jocurile video au ajuns niste filme unde jucatorul poate sa schimbe cursul povestii. Toti gamerii cauta happy end-ul care de fapt nu se sfarseste niciodata cu desavarsire si nu mai vine niciodata. Asemenea razbunarilor clasice sau spiralei violentei nici jocurile video nu au un sfarsit. Chiar daca gamerul termina sau se plictiseste de un joc in scurt timp va apare altul cu dificultate mai mare. Frustrarile nerealizarii sarcinilor din joc, agresivitatea si in final bucuria rezolvarii jocului vor fi mai mari si din ce in ce mai mari. Asemenea consumatorului de substante psihoactive in acelasi fel si gamerul devine din ce in ce mai scindat intre manifestari de bucurie extrema si frustrare extrema. Insa continuand in felul acesta atat jocul cat si jucatorul se va rupe din ce in ce mai tare de comunitatea umana concreta refugiindu-se intr-o regresiune salbatica a razboiului perpetuu. Iata de ce scopul originar al jocului de socializare si dezvoltare a abilitatilor de functionare in societate este anulat de degenerarea jocurilor agresive care il rup pe jucator de comunitate. In locul consolidarii comunitatii ea pare mai mult sa se fractioneze astfel. Cat de degenerata si lipsita de obiect poate ajunge astfel agresivitatea umana in raport cu agresivitatea bruta, exacta si limitata in timp a animalului!

Jocurile video si spectacolul popular in general arata reperele falsei libertati pe care societatea contemporana o promite membrilor ei. In ciuda libertatii promise sclavul societatii contemporane este din ce in ce mai sufocat de reguli, legi si regulamente care il fac sa explodeze in sublimari auxiliare. Tendintele antisociale, suprauzitarea satisfactiilor instinctuale ca sexualitatea si nutritia excesiva se regasesc in tot ceea ce inseamna spectacol contemporan. Umilit la job de stare de inferior in ierarhia concreta a productiei, sclavul modern se razbuna seara luand virtual arma in mana (mouse-ul sau joystickul) si impuscand inamicii. In ciuda eliberarii jucatorul se prinde mai mult si mai mult in capcanele predatoriale ale consumismului. Urmatorul pas al agresivitatii este sa ia arma reala si sa-si impuste colegii sau fostii colegi. Cazurile de aceste treceri dinspre realitatea fantasmatica inspre cea concreta sunt multiple.

Jocurile video par un fenomen scapat de sub control. Shooterele au fost create initial de US Army care a incercat sa atraga mai multi tineri astfel catre inrolarea „de buna voie”. Intre timp ele au devenit marturie cum ca ceva nu este in regula cu societatea noastra. Cumva acest lucru este de inteles. Civilizatia umana este inca la inceput. Omul e mai aproape de conditia de animal in cautare perpetua de hrana si adapost decat un adevarat „homo sapiens” care sa actioneze ca un intelept. Cei care au asigurata aceasta bruma de civilizatie si nu mai trebuie sa aiba grija zilei de maine sunt o minoritate in comparatie cu restul oamenilor. Ba chiar ei folosesc resursele comunitatii pentru a-i inrobi si mai mult pe cei multi si in felul acesta ii frustreaza si mai tare provocandu-le mai multa agresivitate si resentiment. Asa ca pana una alta jocurile agresive reusesc sa foloseasca intereselor nu doar a corporatiilor care le produc dar si a supraprivilegiatilor sociali abatand astfel atentia de la ei din partea unor potentiali rasculati. Astfel ca, decat sa riste o confruntare cu fortele de ordine care au arme superioare multi dintre ei prefera un razboi de la egal la egal in spatiul unei retele de computere conectate la un server.

Freedom, equality and fraternity in psychoanalysis

2012-01-06T09:38:00.000-08:00

varianta in limba romana

First it should be said that the term "equality" although has a long and dense history still has a metaphorical shape. We know that even that twins who resemble each other more than they resemble themselves [:)] are not equal, one is usually faster than the other. This metaphor has political flavor and involves the Western society’s need for liberation from classic slavery. Granting artificial divine or extrahuman value to aristocracy or regality automatically implies the same artificial withdrawal of slave’s human value. In this case there is a negative compensation involved.

Meanwhile the classic slavery was replaced by the industrial or corporate slavery and the mixture of liberty with slavery led to the explosion of mental disorders (depressive generally) especially in the second half of the twentieth century, which continues to beginning of the 21st. I saw written at one time on a shirt “Liberté, égalité, desolé” ... The ideals of “liberty equality and fraternity” were replaced by the rhetoric of impossibility of existence neither equality, because people are different, nor freedom, because we are affected by the organic / psychological laws, and nor brotherhood because we are not all born by the same mother. I used the term “rhetoric” because these realities have become instruments to promote new slavery by the contemporary rule of law society. Since there is no absolute freedom that is a reason for the new slave owners to create a restrictive legal framework or social system that increasingly looks more to police state than open society. All of these can be justified in the name of no absolute ontological freedom. But when it comes to justify their colonial impulses (like the invasion of Iraq or Vietnam) the new slavery social systems emphasizes the very gift of freedom given to citizens that they liberated from the “tyranny”. Here is how this dialectic of meaning is used in each of the two exclusive versions depending on the politicians’ short time interests as usual. Instead of old fashioned gas used by Saddam Hussein to crush the revolt the rule of law uses delicate gas specific to police forces specific to ... Western democracy meantime implemented in Iraq. In this case and in all cases of emancipation (including the famous 19th century American antislavery war between north and south) we are dealing with replacing the classical slavery with the modern slavery.

From my point of view the slavery is the origin of mental disorders and, equally, stopping slavery will stop mental disorders aggravation (although not immediately but in time over generations). For me the mental disorder is a mixingof peripheral pulsional / behaviors / reactions / feelings / that belong to either of two different cultures or to two different environmental or social realities. The dose of political freedom obtained by contemporary individual mixed with corporatism masked slavery man causes mental disorder. The sexuality that Freud observed (excessively enlarged concept) as both hiperenergetic and inhibited by the neuroses (sublimated in symptoms or in everyday life psychopathology) is the very expression of this type of socio-environmental-cultural mixture. Mimicking a high life (or high class) but the actual living in harsh realities of slavery is generally sign of mental disorder. The solution for mental disorder moderation is not psychoanalysis, but the very cancellation of slavery. Psychoanalysis can solve only some superficial psychical conflicts.

The true cure of contemporary individual mental disorders needs both time for healing and also the cancellation of the factors that cause the injury. These factors are brief review above. The rules of the classical psychoanalysis are limited to the contemporary mentality of rejecting slavery but still denial its existence today and restricting the “slavery” term to the classical slavery only. However, this rejection is only a formal one, related to the traditional humanism pressures. But, under the exact model of sublimation, the hidden newslavery works quietly as a cancer under the mask of open society pure principles and participatory democracy. In other words, if the primitive survives in the modern, than certainly the feudal is still very active in it.

Therefore, for me the essence of psychopathological “cure” does not rely (any more) in individual therapy but in the whole social therapy. I’m not saying that individual therapy would be totally unnecessary but it is far from providing what seemed to provide by the Freud’s words: the “consciousness”, i.e. passing the representations (which can not be separated neither by affect nor by pulsion) from socalled register of unconscious eternity to the conscious temporality is just a metaphor. This metaphorical conception has no coverage in any facts since any psychological content crystallizes over time and loses its plasticity by becoming pulsion. The “plasticity of instinct" that Freud and psychoanalysis talked about is just a crystallization of such peripheral mental contents inside the body of instinctual pulsion. The psychoanalysis can not any longer change such content as the board is not necessary after the concrete has hardened.

If we pay close attention to it, the psychoanalysis has “settled” only the tip of the iceberg of the mental disorder inspite of its spectacular therapeutic at the early 20th century (which since then kind of became obsolete to put it on the right). No neurotic was completely “cured” in the true sense of the word. Many have (re) converted into... depressive. On the same note we can say that those who were “reborn” later were converted into manic ... becoming ardent apostles of a new religion. It is an evolution for the better indeed but not so great as psychoanalysts have presented it.

Classical (nowadays) psychoanalysis somehow reflects this ambivalent reality. When the slave comes to analysis (no matter if it is more emancipated since can afford such a fad) seeks for the limits of her or his freedom. The patient sees the analyst as its owner and negotiates with him or her that symbolic freedom that can not take on its own, because that was the education for thousands of years. It is said “the analyst can not give up its authority”. Indeed, the analyst can not give up its authority because he actually assumes this authority, it transforms into the traditional master figure that provides gratification for its slave. For many slaves the releasing of their children could be done by a sex affair or any kind of affair with the master. This transgenerational psychic crystallized social reality is repeated in side the analysis. Giving the freedom to enjoy the sexual desire or reliving early childhood enjoying motherhood, the psychoanalyst is for the patient that master who gives life and a certain level of freedom to the slave. “You may” and “You may not” are key phrases that the confused patient finds its peace nesting at the analyst’s breast milk transforming it from indifferent and cold into tolerant, kind and attentive to his needs and feelings.

The patient-analyst relationship is an ideal form of slavery because repeats at a certain micro-level the relationship between rulers and ruled. It is ideal because the analyst is probably the most human of all political leaders; no one gets out worse that was before from psychoanalysis cure. Psychoanalytic cure improves more or less well but any relationship with a (non psychoanalyst) leader will sooner or later turn into psychological erosion and increase of ruled specific psychopathological structure. But it is this slavery mentality prison makes the classical psychoanalysis and its typical frame rules a kind of political limited activity. Obviously, in this case, the classical psychoanalysis itself is caught in a vicious circle: it takes on a symbolic level the relationship between master and slave that is exactly what makes the slave to fall into psychopathological despair. It is like one treats alcoholism disease with a little drink or the drug addiction with daily dose of drug. The healing time seems.

Through its political docility the psychoanalysis itself agrees that state of political ambivalence because it can not see beyond the walls of the cave slave mentality. And the role of leader-ruled frame is just the level of limitation to this mentality. It is still in the ghetto. Classic psychoanalysis does not understand that it has the chance to become the most important institution in a future society in which the slavery (including that of today masked by the rule of law and democracy lies) would be totally eradicated. For now it can not accept the “equality” since it actually needs slavery system for to send victims to rags. It is dependent on slave mentality. In a world without any slavery a lot of elements of the psychoanalytical classical frame will spray. The analyst-patient discrimination is one of them.

Libertate, egalitate si fraternitate in psihanaliza

2011-11-15T10:34:00.000-08:00

English version here

Acest articol s-a dorit initial un comment la articolul „Invata-ma sa te inteleg relationist” de pe cafe Cradiva publicat aici :

http://www.cafegradiva.ro/2011/11/invata-ma-sa-te-inteleg-relationist.html

Mai intai trebuie precizat ca termenul "egalitate" desi are o istorie lunga si deasa totusi e unul metaforic. Stim ca nici macar gemenii aia care seamana intre ei mai mult decat seamana cu ei insisi [ :)] nu sunt egali, de obicei unul e mai iute decat celalalt. Respectiva metafora are iz politic si presupune nevoia societatii occidentale de eliberare de sub sclavagismul clasic. Acordarea artificiala de valoare divina sau supra umana aristocratiei sau regalitatii implica automat o retragere la fel de artificiala a valorii umane a sclavului. Este vorba de o compensare prin negatie in acest caz.

Intre timp sclavagismul clasic a fost inlocuit cu cel industrial sau corporatist iar amestecul de libertate cu sclavagism a condus la explozia de tulburari psihice (in general de factura depresiva) in special in cea de-a doua jumatate a secolului XX, lucru care continua si la inceput de secol 21. Am vazut la un moment dat pe un tricou expresia "Liberté, égalité, desolé"... Idealurile „egalitatii libertatii si fraternitatii” au fost inlocuite de retorica imposibilitatii existentei nici a egalitatii, pentru ca oamenii sunt diferiti, nici a libertatii pentru ca suntem afectati de legi organice/psihice stricte si nici a fraternitatii pentru ca nu toti suntem nascuti de aceeasi mama. Spun retorica pentru ca aceste realitati au devenit instrumentele promovarii noului sclavagism al statului de drept contemporan. Daca nu exista o libertate absoluta asta e un motiv pentru noii stapani sa creeze un cadrul legislativ restrictiv sau un sistem social ce seamana din ce in ce mai mult cu statul politienesc. Toate acestea in numele faptului ca nu exista o libertate ontologica absoluta. Dar cand e vorba sa isi justifice impulsurile colonialiste (de genul invadarii Irakului sau Vietnamului) sistemele neosclavagiste aduc pe tapet tocmai libertatea pe care ele le ofera cetatenilor eliberati de sub jugul „tiraniilor”. Iata ca aceasta dialectica a sensurilor este folosita in fiecare dintre cele doua variante exclusiviste in functie de interesele de moment de catre politicieni asa cum le este specific. In locul gazelor rudimentare folosite de Saddam Hussein pentru a inabusi revolta vom avea gaze delicate folosite de fortele de ordine specifice … democratiei occidentale implementate intre timp in Irak. Avem de a face in acest caz precum si in toate cazurile de emancipare (inclusiv in celebrul razboi antisclavagist dintre nord si sud din SUA secolului 19) cu inlocuirea sclaviei clasice cu cea moderna.

Din punctul meu de vedere sclavagismul este originea tulburarilor psihice si, in aceeasi masura, anularea sclavagismului poate conduce la anularea lor (chiar daca nu imediat ci in timp pe parcursul generatiilor). Pentru mine tulburarea psihica este amestecul de pulsiuni periferice/comportamente/reactii/sentimente/ ce apartin fie a doua culturi diferite fie a doua realitati sociale sau de mediu diferite. Doza de libertate politica obtinuta de omul contemporan amestecata cu sclavagismul mascat al corporatismului determina tulburarea psihica. Sexualitatea observata de Freud (concept excesiv largit) ca suprapotentata si inhibata in acelasi timp la nevroze ( sublimata in simptom sau in psihopatologia vietii cotidiene) este ea insasi expresia acestui tip de amestec socio-culturo-ambiental. Mimarea unei vieti de high life (sau high class) dar trairea efectiva in realitatile dure ale sclavagismului este specificul tulburarii psihice in general. Solutia temperarii sale nu este psihanaliza ci anularea sclavagismului. Psihanaliza rezolva doar unele conflicte psihice superficiale.

Adevarata vindecare a tulburarilor psihice ale omului contemporan are nevoie de timp pentru cicatrizare si de anularea factorilor care produc rana. Iar acesti factori sunt cei analizati succint mai sus. Regulile cadrului psihanalizei clasice sunt limitate la dispozitia mentalitatii contemporane de a se dezice sincer de sclavagism. Aceasta dezicere este doar una formala, legata de presiunile umanismului. Insa, dupa modelul exact al sublimarii, sclavagismul functioneaza tacit ca un cancer sub masca curata a principiilor societatii deschise si democratiei participative. Altfel spus, daca primitivul supravietuieste in omul modern, cu siguranta feudalul e inca foarte activ in el.

De aceea, pentru mine esenta "vindecarii" psihopatologice nu (mai) sta in terapia individuala ci in terapia societatii. Nu spun ca terapia individuala ar fi total inutila insa ea e departe de a oferi ce a parut ca ofera prin insele vorbele lui Freud: "constientizarea", adica trecerea reprezentarilor (care nu pot fi despartite de afect si nici de pulsiune) din asanumitul registru al eternitatii inconstiente in cel al temporaritatii constiente este doar o metafora. Acesat conceptie metaforica nu are nici un fel de acoperire in fapte pentru ca orice continut psihic se cristalizeaza in timp si isi pierde plasticitatea devenind pulsiune. „Plasiticiatea instinctului” de care vorbeste Freud si unii psihanalisti nu este decat o astfel de cristalizare a unor astfel de continuturi psihice periferice in corpul fixat al pulsiunii instinctuale. Psihanaliza nu mai are ce face unor astfel de continuturi dupa cum cofrajul nu mai este necesar betonului care s-a intarit.

Daca o luam la bani marunti, psihanaliza nu a "rezolvat" decat varful aisbergului tulburarii psihice cu toata spectaculozitatea ei terapeutica de la inceputul secolului 20 (spectaculozitate care intre timp a cam intrat ea insasi in desuet ca s-o spunem pe drept). Nici un nevrotic nu a fost "vindecat" in adevaratul sens al cuvantului. Multi s-au (re)convertit in... depresivi. In aceeasi nota se poate spune ca cei "renascuti" s-au convertit in... maniacali devenind niste apostoli infocati ai unei noi religii. Este o evolutie in bine intr-adevar dar nu este atat de mare pe cat psihanalistii si-au prezentat-o.

Psihanaliza clasica (actuala) cumva reflecta aceasta realitate ambivalenta. Cand vine in analiza sclavul (fie el ceva mai emancipat devreme ce isi poate permite un astfel de moft ) cauta limitele libertatii sale. Analizandul vede in psihanalist pe acel stapan si negociaza cu el libertatea simbolica pe care nu si-o poate lua de la sine putere, pentru ca asa a fost educat timp de mii de ani sa se comporte. Se spune in articol „analistul nu poate renunta la autoritatea lui " . Intr-adevar, nu poate renunta la autoritatea lui pentru ca el de fapt isi asuma aceasta autoritate, se transfigureaza in figura traditionala a stapanului ce ofera gratificare sclavului sau. Pentru multi sclavi eliberarea macar a odraslelor lor se poate realiza printr-o legatura amoroasa sau de orice fel cu stapanul. Aceasta realitate sociala cristalizata psihic transgenerational se repeta in analiza. Ca ii da libertatea de a se bucura de libido sau ca isi retraieste copilaria bucurandu-se de maternitate, psihanalistul este pentru pacient acel stapan care ii ofera viata sclavului si care ii ofera si nivelul de libertate. „Ai voie” si „n-ai voie” sunt expresiile principale prin care pacientul confuz isi regaseste linistea cuibarindu-se la pieptul matern al analistului transformandu-l astfel din indiferent si rece in ingaduitor, binevoitor si atent la nevoile si trairile sale.

Relatia analist analizand este o forma ideala de sclavagism deoarece repeta la nivel microsocial relatia dintre conducator si condus. Spun ideala deoarece dintre toti conducatorii probabil ca psihanalistul este cel mai uman; nimeni nu iese dintr-o cura de psihanaliza mai mutilat psihic decat a fost. Cura psihanalitica face bine mai mult sau mai putin pe cand orice relatie cu un conducator (nepsihanalist) duce mai devreme sau mai tarziu la erodare psihica si la accentuarea structurii psihopatologice specifice condusului. Dar tocmai aceasta priponire in mentalitatea sclavagista face din psihanaliza clasica cu cadrul ei tipic o activitate limitata politic. Evident, in acest caz psihanaliza clasica insasi este prinsa intr-un cerc vicios: ea reia la nivel simbolic relatia dintre stapan si sclav adica exact ceea ce il face pe sclav sa cada in disperarea psihopatologica. Este ca si cum te-ai trata de alcoolism cu o dusca mica sau de sevraj cu doza zilnica de drog. Pe moment pare o vindecare dar in timp este de fapt o dependenta.

Psihanalizei insasi, prin docilitatea ei politica, ii convine aceasta stare de ambivalenta politica pentru ca nu poate vedea dincolo de zidurile pesterii mentalitatii sclavagiste. Iar cadrul rolurilor condus-conducator este exact stadiul sau de limitare la aceasta mentalitate. Ea inca se afla in ghetou. Psihanaliza clasica nu intelege ca ea are sansa sa devina ce mai importanta institutie intr-o societate viitoare in care sclavagismul (inclusiv cel mascat de minciunile statului de drept si democratiei actuale) ar fi total eradicat. Ea deocamdata nu poate accepta „egalitatea” pentru ca de fapt are nevoie de insusi sistemul sclavagist care sa-i trimita victime spre carpire. Ea este tributara mentalitatii sclavagiste. Intr-o lume lipsita total de sclavagism multe elemente ale cadrului clasic se vor pulveriza. Discriminarea ontologica analist-analizand este una dintre ele.

Looking back … Moving forward…

2011-03-31T11:20:00.000-07:00

Click aici pentru varianta in limba romana

"Moving forward" seemed to be a sort of trilogy ending. After my doubts about the first Zeitgheist ("The Movie") and after my joy about the "Addendum" I expected a great deal from this 3rd part especially because it has over 150 minutes footage. Unfortunately I have not found the vitality of the "Addendum" anymore although monetary system analysis goes further in some respects. Maybe it was me that was already familiar with all the documentary themes, maybe I was accustomed to a community that accepts its specific ideas and maybe that is why I was not so excited to find fellow ideology elsewhere. Anyway, I agree with more than 90% of ideas presented in the film but I found a small number of new things that I am particularly interested. I will elaborate these affirmations in the following sections and I will begin with positive things of the documentary.

What I liked best in "Zeitgeist 3: Moving Forward"

From the very beginning I emphasize the fact that the technical and artistic achievement of this 3rd part documentary is indeed a step forward towards the other two made before. Peter Joseph knows his job. He knows how to deal with image and when to push different items on display, giving them amplitude. He is a true professional, one can see his experience in the field and the success of the other two documentaries motivated him even more to move forward on this side.

Regarding the ideas presented in the film the most I liked that of the correlation between physiological disease or mental disorder psychological disorder and the very social status in which they appear. I subscribe to this idea from 13 years ago when I wrote “The dynamics of abyssal psychology” . Starting from minute 1.25 Peter Joseph makes a very coherent and profound analysis of this state of facts that turns the classical psychoanalysis and genetics theories of seem a kind of newcartesianism. Insisting on the theory of “libidinal stages evolution” or hormonal and genetic disorders in the explanation of diseases and mental disorders as these theories do at the beginning of the XXI century is no longer a matter of ignorance or scientific failure, but complacency in hypocrisy.

Another thing that is worth noticing in the documentary is the attention to crime and, the fact that the criminal is a victim herself/himself that transmits on the frustrations and abuses received from the society or family. Instead of protecting children from abuses in order not to make them criminals today's society keeps strengthened by military and police forces of order designed to discourage their reflection back into society. Law enforcement develops directly proportional to citizens declining standard of living. As slave worker living costs and quantity of the work are increasing its aggression also increases. The barrier between respectable citizen and criminal becomes very unclear if the worker's life is getting worse. The criminal is that margin of error that goes beyound this border. Luxury and wealth are made by slaves by more or less subtle stealing of their work; as they make that luxury possible for the privileged social classes they also accumulate frustrations and criminal tendencies and their inhibition is done by security forces that keeps accentuate these frustrations. Just like the vicious circle of neurosis contemporary society proves itself a neurosis at the institutional level where Unconscious represented by criminals fight on life and death struggle with the repressing Conscious represented by security forces. Strengthening law enforcement implies addition expenses supported by society and in the very end supported by the same slave worker, which implies increasing of personal frustrations and propensity to crime. The justice system is the most organized of all crimes as others theorists have noted before (Michel Foucault, Friedrich Nietzsche, some ancient sophists etc.) Security forces prevent indeed such abuses that ex slave criminal can make to the society. But they mainly protect powerful people of society thus increasing the possibility for them to fire just over the helpless: children, women, the members of the criminal-victim. Today's society reports toward criminals the same way as the gangs and anti-government tight terrorist organizations reports to officials creating so-called spiral of tight terrorism and beyond such tight terrorism that politicians presents as the only terrorism its contemporary itself that behaves in a terrorist way as I pointed in this article. http://baldovinconcept.blogspot.com/2010/02/terrorism-as-pillar-of-state.html

Instead of investing in psychotherapists to find any abuse in the next criminals families today society invests in the military and police forces that have the main role to threaten the slave and to make it productive inventing various excuses and conflicts between nations in order to justify their existence and to discreetly wash up this dirty image. It's time to see what's wrong with the society itself in relationship with criminals beyond demonizing and perceiving them as the only ones responsible for their hateful acts. Unfortunately at this moment it is more profitable to invest in the army and police forces that protect you from the raging crowd. An open and humanist educated child no longer accepts the slave labor and slavery or contemporary newslavery system collapse in the lack of slaves. Justice is the "necessary evil" or “smaller evil" that frequently people say about. Obviously this formula is designed by the observer's point of view: for the privileged social justice is evident that the justice is the smaller evil because the institutions make their lives easier. They throw the garbage in the yard of the crowd. But for the criminal the lesser evil is crime itself that he or she had no choice but to do it and the greatest evil is the very state that brought the situation to commit the crime. So, as Fresco says at the late of documentary, the one who seeks justice finally comes to be defeated by it.

What I did not like in "Zeitgeist 3: Moving Forward"

There are plenty of real and productive ideas in the film, I do not insist on all of them because the reader can notice herself/ himself by simply seeing it. Right now I would like to focus on things that I did not like. First of all documentary seems to me to be too long and too out of shape. It seems to be a press conference where Peter Joseph responds to all the various themes proposed by the audience. From this point of view Zeitgeist 3 documentary somehow has not a consistent methodology, a melodic line. It passes from one topic to another without drawing a conclusion in the end in order to explain such a zigzag evolution of the speech. I think it would have been better to have three different one-hour or less for each documentaries instead of a big 160 minutes one. There could be one single project concerning the effectiveness of Venus, then another one about crime and its conditioning to the social environment and another one about robotic technology and end of the slavery edge. Peter Joseph did not make a detailed approach in no one of these topics and gave me the impression that he left them hanging in the air.

There are also several inaccuracies that do not belong in such a documentary and have no contribute whatsoever for the dynamics of argumentation. For example at the beginning of the film is said that schizophrenia is not genetically conditioned but suggested as largely being induced by the social environment. I commend and support the film intention to show up the excessive usage of genetics for explaining certain dubious behaviors particularly for protecting and justifying them and not to change them. Indeed the excessive usage of genetics argument is a disguised form of the older argument of "destiny" to exploit and rob common people by the social privileged ones. The theory of "divine right" * which lasted until close to modernity is a good example. Absolute genetics which is looking for gene for one behavior or another source become a contemporary source of myths painted in scientific precision colors. But despite of its vogue for now it is not a science in the sense of observation sciences, but an amalgam of experiments on rats and other animals. Just like neurology genetic too is still kidding, an early childhood science although they both have had remarkable results. Its spectacular shape comes from the fact that it overlaps the contemporary man ambivalence towards religion. On the one hand it confirms that people are genetic descendants from the ancestors so it promises that at one certain point will find out who was Adam. On the other hand genetics allowed the manipulation of the facts that were previously ascribed to God only. Slowly but surely humanity become convinced that children do not come from God, but are expressions of nature which, in this case are... genetics.

Despite its momentousness as a science it is full of assumptions and there is no typical verification tools to confirm or infirm them. Searching particular one gene for each behavior and explaining it through this genetics nebula refusing environment understanding even in parallel with the genetic paradigm looks like another kind of classic dualism painted in misleading colors of contemporary laboratories. Geneticists pipettes and tubes not impress me neither their scientists tired old-fashioned allure! When they would (re)create the first dinosaur then would be able to congratulate themselves for creating a serious science and for creating a consistent theory of genes. Until then, geneticists seem to worth more for capitalist propaganda!

Yet must not fall into the other extreme and believe that everything is pure environment just as it did Pavlov and his followers, the behaviorists, without understanding the predisposition genetic factor. Regarding DSM IV schizophrenia percentage is from 0.5 to 1.5% in the population (p. 308). But the risk of developing schizophrenia is 10 times higher for the first degree descendants of those who have this disease than normal (p. 309). I agree that social factors and education received may influence the shape of schizophrenic symptoms but the predisposition of general schizophrenia development is decisively influenced by genetic factors. Is not very good to put such errors in such a documentary! You lose credibility! Addition to this, such a theme has no meaning to the main interest of the film. There is no good reason for such an extra theme in the evolution of the documentary.

The situation is repeated at minute 1.15 where Max Keiser talks about the difference between those who occupy cynical functions in the economy or general social institutions and the normal people. This difference would consist in so-called “brain damage” after the words of the interviewee. I think one of the theoretical problems of Peter Joseph is just lack of training in psychology and psychopathology. The theme of brain dysfunction in psychopathology has sparked many controversies in recent decades. Even schizophrenia has not a clear verdict regarding such neurophysiologic dysfunctions although it is most likely to have. Even less such a small personality disorder (but unfortunately with very serious consequences on the world) as described by the interviewed one is unlikely to be due to organic dysfunction (hard) but more likely to be due to psychic conformation (soft). That is why DSM has replaced the old term "mental illness" that had in it the concept of organic dysfunction with "mental disorder" that appears closer to the actual soft informational-pulsional mental reality than the hard one of the cerebral organic system. Although the neurophysiology used to be expected to find new therapeutic solutions, however as it developed more in the second half of the twentieth century concluded itself that the physiological substrate is not the decisive element in psychopathology. The brain of the most mental disorders is normally functioning. Nerve impulses, hormonal control of the organs, reflexes, reactions to stimulus etc. works the same for mental disorders people as it works for normal people. The difference consists only in the intensity degree of these reactions.

Naturally when we see such a cyborg we have the tendency to say that there is something wrong with its brain but it is more a curse, a warm response than a precise and profound scientific statement. The human brain is not a barrel. A brain injury or a brain excision may produce extremely different effects depending on the place, time and intensity of its occurrence. The human brain seems like an inert body but everyone knows already that it is an entire universe. Such an organic brain damage can lead also to hiperempathy and hiperafectivity. One can not explain the inhumane behavior of some Wall Street employees as “brain damage”. In this case not only the half 20-th century Western psychiatry switching is not known by Peter Joseph, but he and others seem to go back to the 18th and 19th century views on mental disorder. Such a theoretical approach very much resembles to the untrained people vision who accuses her/his enemies as suffering from "insanity". Even if Peter Joseph did not directly express his opinion, however he tolerated and put it in this documentary which certifies the fact that he missed some studies in this area, lectures that are crucial for the work he begun.

At min. 1.40 is a statement with which I also disagree. It says that if we do not take into account the changes required there is very likely to disappear as a species because we are wasting resources and we pollute the planet by poisoning. I do not think that this is the line to justify the need for these changes. Actually, it was seen how hypocrite intentions of Al Gore and many corporations support environmental protection campaigns. It is very easy to refute such an environment disaster idea. The earth is mostly clean. Global warming is a hoax. Pollutants generally pollute sensitive Gothic civilization of cities. If you stay longer in the wild or out of urban congestion than pollution will no longer seemed a problem and with it they hypocritically want to induce notion that society should not reform because actually we have minor problems with pollution or no problem at all. This is not at stake! We need to change society in order to correct and make it fair. We need to change it to give us the rights promised in constitutions. We need to change it because when we were kids we were told at school to do what we were told in exchange for different promises that the system forgot in meantime. Many of us have forgotten this real contract between us as children and system but some of us have not so now simply ask the system to fulfill its principle obligations under the contract. Unfortunately most of these ideals are just words on paper and civilization is an empty and colorful set of lies. We live in a world of lies, frauds and wars. This is not civilization but smiling jungle. Typeface. Hypocrisy. Unfortunately again, many of us never had better parents or teachers to protect us from abuses east of such an inhumane contract and we fell into wild education trap.

Conclusions, surveys, evaluations

One can see an interesting evolution in the thinking of Peter Joseph that is to find in my own thinking. In the first Zeitgeist (The movie) evil in the world was focused on a kind of secret, elitist, implacable and invincible society that creates religions in different parts of the world in order to control the masses. In the second one (Addendum) this evil moved somehow to monetary system. In this third Zeitgeist spirit fixated on something else like in Hegel's speech :). Peter Joseph reached the point to says that there no politicians, neither banks, nor the military are responsible for the evil in the world but something else, thus introducing a new concept in its theme but somehow old and commonplace in psychology: "psychosocial stress" (1:28 min). I think that the openness to psychotherapy and psychology is the way Peter must follow in order to enhance his speech.

I myself want to do this in my art and my theories speech. After a period of several years of stressful life style that I put aside any possibility of solving current problems in today society now I go back to my old hobby: psychology. But that does not mean giving up the idea of revising social values as there are stressful and toxic information social environment in today's society. Psychotherapy alone can not change things as long as the social environment is more or less a terrorist one. I have friends in both Zeitgeist and psychoanalysts’ communities and I would like to attract the first for understanding their psychological background of a beyond the idealization of the endenic future Venus Project as much as I would like to take the others out of the maternalist exlcusivism understanding of family microsociety causality for human mind. The Lacanian and Freudian abyssal psychologies are both different forms of structuralism and thus they assume all the shortcomings of that thinking.

On the other hand, in terms of psychology, the Zeitgeist community members ignore almost at all the personal interiority and throw everything towards social exteriority. It looks to me as an emotional and factual exclusive investment in the Venus Project and not very much training regarding psychology. Peter Joseph has plenty unreadings even if there are also valuable insights (some of them discovered by others in the past...). After this statement there are a lot of other psychological ins and outs that Peter Joseph had not seen very clearly yet although he guessed them. There are more to say after this "psychosocial stress" but he stopped and ended.

For example, the informational and emotional toxic environment promoted by present civilized society has a very specific purpose which Peter Joseph seems not to notice. Inferiority complexes that sick people minds every second are spread into society on different channels just like radio waves spread into the ether. Their maim role is to and to convince slave soul to "voluntarily" work by buying unnecesary products and false technology (new design objects) which covers and satisfy this inferiority complex. Although this inferiority complexes are satisfied after the very moment of acquisition still, on long-term time this blind shopping traps harder the slave in slavery because she/he must perform additional work to cover the costs of their acquisition. Beyond microfamilial side described by Freud in this moment I am convinced that narcissism has a much more important macrosocial side as well said some 80 years ago the third founder of the psychoanalytic movement, Alfred Adler. Instead of death threat as used in classical age, the contemporary slavery system recruits its slaves by inveigling their narcissism. Firstly the system humiliates them starting since from the early school and then by all the commercials that systematically harass their psychodynamic background. The narcissism is a partial "healing" of this inferiority complex brought by classical culture and careful speculated by contemporary culture.

The result is a man who wants increasingly more and more, a dependent man as it is pointed out in this third documentary. We are talking about a greedy blind by consumption man who is slowly but surely destroying social relationships with others and who risk to destroy even the planet if continue on this way. But as I said above the nature through human nature has the power to regenerate and self-regulate so despite pessimistic I am convinced that things will change in better. But that does not mean we must forget the past and remain passive in the hope of a change that would come without an effort on our part and wait for the nature effort. Things must be very categorically named. Western society has been and remains a huge battlefield marked by a few islands of calm and piece. As being battlefield in sense of war or psychological battle, contemporary civilization proves to be wilder than what it shows in the constitutions of states that is why so many other papers full of propaganda neoscolastic texts are.

I would like Peter Joseph to continue exposing other social institutions also as he did with the monetary system in Addendum and even continued in this third one. But instead of something like this he shows the Venus Project that we have been talking on Team Speak for some time now. Venus, Venus, Venus ... I'm tired of talking about Venus as long as ordinary people do not have that basic political power to get out of the current political system. I did not need a futuristic city as I need the certainty that if I would relocate to live alone in the mountains the police would not come to arrest me for being an anarchist or a terrorist! Who would invest in a project like Venus if in the future comes the next George Bush with the military forces and accuse me of having chemical weapons? Let's give up the naiveties and large steps in the favor of smaller but more certain steps! If I get the minimum that political freedom then I not know if I would need to invest in a new city. I can easily use the old ones.

I think "Moving Forward" is a documentary of the Zeitgeist movement crisis itself beyond being a current society crisis documentary. Zeitgeist Movement had a powerful start. The first Zeitgeist was systematically removed by YouTube without realizing that they actually contribute to its popularization. After Zeitgeist Addendum became famous and after YouTube and realized that if they would continue to delete these videos which would undermine their own image, Zeitgeist has became a really mass phenomenon. Peter Joseph has been invited to hold conferences in different places and even has a radio show. Zeitgeist turned into an international movement and myself have attended meetings on Team-speak (Port: 9987 Password = tzm). After months of talking and plans for the creation of Venus Project people leave disappointed and so again and again. People come, get involved, organize things then get bored and leave. The truth is that there is not much to be done. Social cyborgs have everythin; they weapons, credibility, and media actors to take their defense in front of the crowds. You can not get out of the system no matter how hard you try. That is actually the contemporary newslavey. In the century of "freedom" you can see that if you want leave the present civilization you simply can not take your own goods out of it; you can leave only for a short moment but soon the taxes will steal your property which, paradoxically, the system makes a statue for. That is because the capitalist system actually does not defend your property but their properties. Those big properties... Their properties are as sacred as themselves. If you refuse to remain slave in the system then you will have no property whatsoever no matter how small it looks compared to theirs. Your property is not (any longer) holy (sic!) and has never been! The myth about the defense of property that makes the difference between our democracy and totalitarian systems is empty propaganda. How guts and insensitiveness must have the exponents of (wild) capitalism to accuse Peter Joseph of Marxism as long as Marxist (those that involve the dictatorship) and fascist elements can be seen so clearly in the capitalist system itself which they are lobbying them and hide its crimes!

Future projects

Somewhere in spring of 2010 the Zeitgeist Movement organized a bit pompous Z-Day. I say Pompous because many members of the movement have been tempted to identify this Z-day with the better known Second World War D-day that meant the Allied landings in France and a turning point for the further evolution of the war. Many believed that the same thing was happening in society at that moment and left the conferences disappointed. Many of the important members were disappointed themselves and left the movement. In these circumstances the triumphalist attitude at the end of this documentary looks very bizarre to me considering these issues. Peter Joseph is still culturally dominated by the imperialist attitude of people gather in large numbers and start a postrobotic crusade against tradition. How many of these illusions have been used throughout history! And the big concern is that this spirit Venus Project comes close to the danger of becoming a new capitalism painted in beautiful words such as communism itself regarding the bourgeoisie. Without inner psychological strength to get on our own frustrations and sublimation, without a psychoanalytic insight Venus Project will remain just a dream, just an illusion. If today society suddenly would become humanistic, if the armies and other institutions threats would disappear then and the people still would continue to stress and pain one another in the virtue of a social pattern imprinted for thousands of years in the poisoned soul of the Western mind. It's something inside that must be changed before or simultaneously with the change of our social exterior.

The situations is not pink at all and near future technology that seems to replace the building worker as presented in the film and even a future omnitechnology able to entirely replace the slave labor as Aristotle a dreamed over 2000 years ago still will not solve the humanity slavery problem. The disappearance of manipulation the contemporary (wo)man will see how actually broken (s)he is! Only when no one will lie her or him how beautiful and how successful in love (s)he is, only then (s)he would see how sad (s)he is and how much misery the last two millenniums brought in the soul of humanity. Then one would see an unprecedented explosion of depressions and suicides! I cannot be triumphant about of such a prospect! I wish cultural toxicity disappear, I want the politicians, army and police to go away, but history will not end (neither) after this episode. Mankind will not become a family after these steps in civilization will be made! Taking my hand with others in a kind of yoga spiral that pretend to be the end of history seems unnatural to me. There's nothing to celebrate! Not literally or figuratively.

One might have the chance to be smart enough and get a higher level job in the system after various tests so that more or less gets rid of slavery. However one needs the cynicism to not see others caught in the nets of manipulation and control system. Without this cynicism one can not promote the social ladder. I resigned myself with the situation. You simply cover your eyes and shut up because if protesting otherwise you might get penalties and persecution at job also in capitalism just as used to happen in communism. So please tell me dear comrades capitalists what about Stalinism and freedom of speech!? After such an experience you just have to get used with the idea that the social system is still wild and be careful with the many offers that very probable might be Trojan horses. You can still be glad that you did more than your parents or grandparents and have a better life than theirs. You have to accept the fact that you are not so smart to cross and reach above social barriers and also not so patiently waiting for the "enlightenment" of adulthood.

I think the real solution to the current social crisis is ceasing overvaluation the social metascams. The majority contempt against the false claimed elitist minority can cause either withdrawal in their ivory towers or social acceptance of humanizing measures. No need to think of how it can be done because they will think better. But as long as we tolerate their luxury, wasting and social poluting we are also responsible for their actions. The solution is simple: the boycott of political scams, refusing to give your vote to these heartless cyborgs the rob you with the smile on their faces. Street riots and violence solves nothing. After the experience of the French Revolution and after numerous protests by workers in the twentieth-century these mind killers have learned to counteract with the disinformation and manipulation techniques. Venus project is a spiritual step rather than the achievement of an exterior city. The obsession of materialization before a spiritual abreaction has an obsessional side indeed. Venus Project reminds me of the famous Jung's mandalas in which humanity has historically seen the embodiment of perfection. The way is: Work less - live more! Even if the current system still requires you to kiss somebody’s ass you have few advantages however to defend yourself. Get rid of TV, radio, get a friend or take an animal if you can not find someone worthy your friendship!

One can see rather half full than half empty. Despite all the cultural traps me and anybody else can still defend ourselves; we can choose and to work less and this is already an interiour liberation before any formal inner city act Venus. Their manipulation would be stranguled if I choose to no longer be a slave and no longer work. I also can buy products made automatically and have honor of not contributing to the enslavement of any worker. I have the choice of not buying products made in China or other countries where corporations have recently moved for the same reason. There are many choices that everyone of us can make to free ourselves from the tyranny of the painted in contemporary humanism colors state.

* "Divine Right" was seen in the classical edge as right upper classes to master the lower ones.

Mergand mai departe, uitandu-ne inapoi...

2011-02-27T03:43:00.000-08:00

English version here:

27 feb 2011

„Moving forward” se anunta un final de trilogie. Dupa rezervele mele fata de primul („The movie”) si dupa incantarea fata de „Addendum” ma asteptam ca aceasta a 3-a parte sa bubuie mai ales ca stim ca tine peste 150 minute. Din pacate n-am mai gasit vitalitatea lui „Addendum” desi analiza sistemului monetar merge mai departe in anumite privinte. Poate ca eram deja familiarizat cu toate temele din film, poate ca eram obisnuit cu o comunitate care accepta ideile specifice documentarului si nu mai sunt atat de entuziasmat sa gasesc colegi de ideologie in alta parte. Oricum, am fost de acord cu peste 90 % din ideile expuse in film insa am gasit cam putine lucruri noi care sa ma intereseze in special. Am sa detaliez aceste propozitii in sectiunile urmatoare si am sa incep prin lucrurile pozitive ale documentarului.

Zeitgeist - Moving Forward Romana

Ce mi-a placut cel mai mult in „Zeitgeist 3: moving forward”

Subliniez mai intai realizarea tehnica si artistica a filmului care s-a tinut de cuvant si este intr-adevar un pas inainte fata de celelalte doua. Peter Joseph stie meserie. Stie sa lucreze cu imaginea stie cand sa dozeze diferitele elemente de pe ecran, stie sa le dea amplitudine. E un profesionist, se vede ca a lucrat in domeniu iar succesul celorlalte doua l-a motivat si mai mult sa mearga mai departe pe aceasta latura.

Cat despre ideile expuse cel mai mult m-a bucurat corelatia intre boala fiziologica sau tulburare psihica si statutul social in care acestea apar. La aceasta idee subscriu inca de acum 13 ani de cand am scris „Dinamica Psihologiei Abisale”. De la minutul 1,25 Peter Joseph face o analiza destul de coerenta si profunda a acestei stari de lucru facand ca teoriile psihanalizei clasice si ale geneticii sa para un neocartezianism. A insista pe teoria "stadiilor de evolutie libidinala" sau pe disfunctii hormonale sau genetice in explicatia bolilor si tulburarilor psihice asa cum fac aceste teorii la inceput de secol al XXI nu mai e o chestiune de nepricepere sau insuficienta stiintifica ci este o complacere in ipocrizie.

Un alt lucru care merita subliniat este atentia catre criminalitate si catre faptul ca criminalul este o victima el insusi ce transmite mai departe frustrarile si abuzurile primite din afara. In loc sa protejeze copiii de abuzuri pentru a nu-i face criminali societatea actuala se intareste cu forte de ordine menite sa descurajeze reflectarea lor inapoi in societate. Fortele de ordine se desfasoara direct proportional cu scaderea nivelului de trai al cetatenilor. Pe masura ce costurile vietii si cantitatea de munca depusa devin din ce in ce mai mari agresivitatea muncitorului sclav devine si ea mai mare. Bariera dintre om respectabil si criminal este foarte neclara in situatia in care viata muncitorului se inrautateste. Astfel ca criminalul este acea marja de eroare ce trece aceasta granita. Luxul si bogatia sunt facute de sclavi si de furarea mai subtila sau mai vizibila a muncii lor; pe masura ce ei creeaza acest lux pentru clasele privilegiate acumuleaza frustrari si manifestari criminale iar inhibarea lor se face cu forte de ordine care le accentueaza frustrarile. Asemenea cercului vicios al nevrozei societatea contemporana se dovedeste ea insasi o nevroza la nivel institutional unde Inconstientul reprezentat de criminali se lupta pe viata si pe moarte cu Constientul reprimant reprezentat de fortele de ordine. Intarirea fortelor de ordine inseamna cheltuieli in plus fata de societate suportate in final tot de catre sclavul muncitor ceea ce implica accentuarea frustrarilor personale si a predispozitiilor catre criminalitate. Justitia este cea mai organizata dintre crime dupa cum au observat si altii inainte (Michel Foucault, Nietzsche, unii sofisti antici etc.) Fortele de ordine previn intr-adevar abuzurile pe care criminalul fost sclav le poate face societatii. Insa ele protejeaza in principal pe puternicii societatii crescand astfel posibilitatea ca ele sa se descarce tocmai asupra celor neajutorati: copiii, femeile ce fac parte din familia criminalului-victima. Asemenea spiralei terorismului restrans al bandelor si organizatiilor antiguvernamentale societatea actuala se comporta fata de criminali in aceeasi maniera dupa principiile statului terorist contemporan enuntate in acest articol .

In loc sa investeasca in psihoterapeuti pentru e descoperi eventualele abuzuri in familiile potentialilor criminali societatea investeste in forte de ordine si armata care au principalul rol de a ameninta sclavul sa fie productiv inventand diferite pretexte si conflicte intre natiuni pentru a-si justifica existenta si a-si spala discret aceasta imagine mizerabila. Cred ca a venit timpul sa vedem ce greseste societatea fata de criminali dincolo de a-i diaboliza si a-i face singuri raspunzatori pentru actele lor odioase. Din pacate in acest moment e mai profitabil intr-adevar sa investesti in forte de ordine si armata care te apara de furia multimii. Un copil educat deschis si umanist nu mai accepta o munca de sclav si atunci in lipsa de sclavi sistemul sclavagist sau neosclavgist contemporan colapseaza. Justitia este acel „rau necesar” sau „rau cel mai mic” despre care se tot spune frecvent. Evident aceasta formula este data de punctul de vedere al observatorului: pentru privilegiatii social evident ca justitia e raul cel mai mic deoarece tocmai aceste institutii le fac lor viata mai usoara. Prin parghiile statului ei arunca gunoiul in ograda prostimii. Insa pentru criminal raul cel mai mic este insasi crima sa in fata careia nu a avut de ales iar raul cel mai mare este insusi statul care l-a adus in situatia de a savarsi crima. De aceea bine spune Fresco spre sfarsitul documentarului ca cel ce cauta dreptatea si justitia ajunge de cele mai multe ori infrant de acestea.

Ce nu mi-a placut in „Zeitgeist 3: moving forward”

Sunt destule idei adevarate si productive in acest documentar, nu insist pe toate deoarece cititorul le poate observa si singur vazandu-l. As vrea acum sa insist pe lucrurile care nu mi-au placut. Mai intai de toate documentarul mi se pare prea lung si prea labartat. Pare o conferinta de presa unde Peter Joseph raspunde pe rand diferitelor teme propuse de audienta. Din acest punct de vedere documentarul e cumva lipsit de o consistenta metodica, de o linie melodica. Se trece de la un subiect la altul fara ca in final sa se traga o concluzie care sa explice o astfel de evolutie zigzagata a discursului. In loc de 160 de minute mai bine se faceau 3 documentare diferite a cate o ora sau mai putin pentru fiecare. Se putea face unul despre eficienta proiectului Venus, altul despre criminalitate si conditionarea sa de mediul social, altul despre tehnologia robotica si sfarsitul erei sclavagismului. Peter Joseph a intrat prea putin in fiecare din aceste teme si mi-a lasat impresia ca le-a lasat suspendate in aer.

Exista si cateva inexactitatati care nu-si au locul intr-un astfel de documentar si care nu contribuie cu nimic la dinamica argumentarii. De exemplu la inceputul filmului se spune ca schizofrenia nu e conditionata genetic si se sugereaza ca ar fi indusa in mare de mediul social. Este laudabila si sustin intentia filmului de a deconspira folosirea geneticii pentru a explica anumite comportamente dubioase in special datorita faptului de a le proteja si justifica si pentru a nu le schimba. Intr-adevar folosirea argumentului genetic este o forma mascata a vechiului argument al „destinului” unora de a-i exploata si jefui pe ceilalti. Teoria „dreptului divin”* care a dainuit pana in vecinatatea modernitatii este un bun exemplu. Genetica absoluta care cauta gene pentru un comportament sau altul a devenit un astfel de izvor mituri contemporane cu alura de precizie stiintifica. Dar cu toata spectaculozitatea ei deocamdata ea nu e o stiinta in sensul stiintelor observatiei ci un amalgam de experimente pe sobolani sau alte animale. La fel ca si neurologia si genetica e inca o joaca, o stiinta aflata la varsta primei copilarii chiar daca ambele au avut rezultate remarcabile. Spectaculozitatea ei este data de faptul ca se suprapune peste ambivalenta omului contemporan fata de religie. Pe de o parte genetica confirma faptul ca oamenii sunt descendenti unii din altii promitand ca la un moment dat se va afla cine a fost Adam. Pe de alta parte genetica a permis manipularea unor fapte care erau atribuite pana acum lui Dumnezeu. Incet dar sigur umanitatea se convinge ca copiii nu mai vin de la Dumnezeu ci sunt expresie a naturii, natura in acest caz… genetica.

In ciuda spectaculozitatii, ca stiinta ea e plina de ipoteze si nu exista instrumente tipice de verificare care sa le sustina sau sa infime. A cauta cate o gena pentru fiecare comportament si a-l explica prin aceasta nebuloasa genetica refuzand intelegerea ambientalista macar in paralel cu paradigma genetica mi se pare un alt tip de dualism clasic vopsit in culorile inselatoare ale laboratoarelor contemporane. Nu ma impresioneaza pipetele si eprubetele geneticienilor si nici alura lor de savanti obositi si demodati! Cand o sa (re)creeze primul dinozaur atunci se vor putea lauda ca sunt o stiinta si ca au o teorie consistenta despre gene. Pana atunci geneticienii se pare ca folosesc mai mult la propaganda capitalista!

Cu toate astea nu trebuie sa cadem in cealalta extrema si sa consideram ca totul este numai ambientalism asa cum a facut Pavlov si urmasii sai behavioristii fara sa intelegem factorul predispozitional, genetic. Dupa DSM IV procentul schizofreniei este de la 0,5 la 1,5 % in randul populatiei (pag 308). Insa riscul de a dezvolta schizofrenie la descendentii de gradul I celor care au aceasta boala este de 10 ori mai mare decat acest procent specific normalitatii (pag. 309). Eu sunt de acord cu faptul ca factorii sociali si educatia primita pot influenta diferit forma simptomelor schizofrenice dar predispozitia dezvoltarii este decisiv influentata de factorul genetic. Nu poti sa bagi astfel de erori intr-un astfel de documentar ! Iti pierzi credibilitatea! Plus de asta, o astfel de tema este si ea in plus. Nu foloseste la nimic in evolutia temei documentarului.

Situatia se repeta la minutul 1.15 unde un Max Keiser vorbeste despre diferenta dintre cei ce au functii cinice in economie si in sistem fata de oamenii normali. Aceasta diferenta ar consta in "dereglarea cerebrala" (brain damage) dupa spusele celui intervievat. Cred ca una dintre problemele teoretice ale lui Peter Joseph este tocmai lipsa de instruire in domeniul psihologiei si psihopatologiei. Tema disfunctiilor cerebrale in psihopatologie a iscat foarte multe controverse in ultimele decenii. Nici macar schizofrenia unde este cel mai probabil sa existe astfel de disfunctionalitati neurofiziologice nu are un verdict clar. Cu atat mai putin o psihopatie usoara (dar din pacate cu consecinte foarte grave asupra lumii) asa cum este descrisa de personajul intervievat este putin probabil sa se datoreze unei disfunctii organice (hard) cat mai curand uneia psihice (soft). Tocmai de aceea DSM a inlocuit termenul vechi de "boala psihica" ce avea in el conceptul de disfunctie fiziologica, organica cu cel de "tulburare psihica" ce pare mai aproape de realitatea soft, informational-pulsionala a aparatului cerebral decat de cea hard, organica. Desi se astepta de la neurofiziologie gasirea unor solutii terapeutice totusi cu cat s-a dezvoltat mai mult in a doua jumatate a secolului al XX-lea cu atat ea insasi a ajuns la concluzia ca nu substratul fiziologic este elementul decisiv pentru psihopatologie. Creierul majoritatii tulburarilor psihice functioneaza normal. Impulsurile nervoase, controlul hormonal al organelor, reflexele, reactiile la stimuli etc. functioneaza la fel si cazurile oamenilor normali si in cazul psihoticilor si psihopatilor. Diferenta consta in gradul de intensitate a acestor reactii.

Fireste ca atunci cand vedem un astfel de cyborg avem tendinta sa spunem ca are o "doaga sarita" insa asta e mai mult un blestem, o reactie la cald decat o afirmatie stiintifica precisa si profunda. Creierul uman nu e un butoi. Un traumatism sau o extirpare poate produce efecte total diferite in comportamentul cuiva in functie de locul, timpul si intensitatea in care s-a produs. O astfel de dereglare organica a creierului poate conduce in acelasi timp si la hiperafectivitate si hiperempatie. Pare el asa un organ inert insa creierul uman e un univers intreg. Nu poti sa reduci explicatia pentru un comportamentul inuman al unor angajati de pe Wall-street prin "dereglare cerebrala". In acest caz nu numai ca schimbarea de macaz a psihiatriei occidentale nu este cunoscuta de Peter Joseph dar el si altii par sa se intoarca la viziuni de secol 18 si 19 despre tulburarea psihica. O astfel de atitudine teoretica seamana extrem de mult cu cea a omului neinstruit care isi acuza dusmanii de "nebunie". Chiar daca nu e opinia lui exprimata direct totusi Peter Joseph a tolerat-o si a pus-o in acest documentar ceea ce atesta faptul ca ii lipsesc niste lecturi din acest domeniu, lecturi ce sunt capitale pentru munca inceputa.

La min. 1.40 se face o afirmatie cu care iarasi nu sunt de acord. Se spune ca daca nu luam in calcul schimbarile necesare este posibil sa disparem ca specie pentru ca ne-am risipi resursele si ne-am polua pana la otravire planeta. Nu cred ca pe linia asta trebuie insistat pentru a justifica necesitatea acestor schimbari. Dealtfel s-a vazut cum un ipocrit ca Al Gore sau numeroase corporatii sustin campanii de protejare a mediului. E foarte usor de combatut o astfel de idee. Pamantul e in cea mai mare parte curat. Incalzirea globala e o mistificare. Noxele polueaza sensibil in general civilizatia gotica a oraselor. Daca stai mai mult timp in natura si iesi din aglomeratia urbana poluarea nu ti se va mai parea o problema si odata cu ea de fapt vor in mod ipocrit sa induca si ideea cum ca nu trebuie sa reformam societatea pentru ca de fapt nu avem nici o problema sau probleme minore cu poluarea. Nu aceasta este miza! Trebuie sa schimbam societatea pentru a o corecta si a o face echitabila. Trebuie sa o schimbam pentru a ni se da drepturile promise in constitutii. Trebuie sa o schimbam pentru ca atunci cand eram mici ni s-a cerut la scoala sa facem ce ni se spune in schimbul unor promisiuni fata de care sistemul nu isi sustine promisiunea. Multi au uitat de acest veritabil contract incheiat intre noi ca si copii si sistem dar unii n-am uitat si acum ii cere sistemului sa isi respecte obligatiile in virtutea principiului contractului. Din pacate astea sunt doar vorbe pe hartie pentru cei mai multi iar civilizatia este un set gol si multicolor de minciuni. Traim intr-o lume de minciuni, escrocherii si razboaie. Asta nu e civilizatie ci manelimsm. Fatada. Ipocrizie. Iarasi din pacate multi dintre noi nu am avut nici parinti si nici profesori suficient de rasariti sa ne protejeze de abuzurile unui astfel de contract inuman si am cazut in plasa educatiei salbatice.

Concluzii, bilanturi, evaluari

Se poate vedea o evolutie interesanta in gandirea lui Peter Joseph evolutie care s-a regasit in propria mea gandire. In primul Zeitgeist (The movie) raul din lume era pus pe seama unui soi de societate secreta, elitista si imbatabila si implacabila care creeaza religiile in diferite parti ale lumii pentru a controla masele. Intr-al doilea (Addendum) acest rau se muta cumva pe sistemul monetar. In acest al treilea Zeitgeist spiritul s-a fixat pe altceva ca in discursul lui Hegel :) . Peter Joseph a ajuns sa spuna ca nu politicienii, nici bancile, nici militarii nu au fost la originea raului din lume si altceva, introducand astfel un nou concept in tematica sa dar cumva si banal vechi in psihologie: „stresul psihosocial” (min. 1 28). Deschiderea spre psihoterapie si psihologie se vede mult mai clar si cred ca acesta este drumul pe care Peter trebuie sa il urmeze pentru a-si intari discursul.

Eu insumi vreau sa fac acest lucru in discursul meu teoretic si artistic. Dupa o perioada de cativa ani de stil de viata stresant in care am dat la o parte orice posibilitate de rezolvare a problemelor societatii actuale in acest moment ma intorc la vechiul meu hobby psihologic. Dar asta nu inseamna ca renunt total la ideea revizuirii valorilor sociale atata timp cat exista mediul social stresant, toxico-informational din societatea de astazi. Psihoterapia nu poate schimba de una singura lucrurile atata timp cat mediul social este mai mult sau mai putin terorist. Sunt prieten si cu comunitatea Zeitgeist si cu comunitatea psihanalistilor si mi-ar placea pe primii sa ii atrag in intelegerea propriului fond psihic dincolo de idealizarea unui viitor edenic al proiectului Venus iar pe ceilalti mi-ar placea sa ii fac sa iasa din exlcusivismul maternalist al unicauzalitatii microsocietatii familiei pentru intelegerea psihicului. Atat psihologia abisala lacaniana cat si cea freudiana sunt ambele diferite forme de structuralism si ambele isi asuma astfel toate neajunsurile structuralismului.

Pe de alta parte in materie de psihologie membrii comunitatii Zeitgeist ignora cvasitotal interioritatea personala si arunca totul inspre exterioritatea societatii. Mi se pare o exclusiva investire emotionala si faptica in proiectul Venus si prea putina pregatire in domeniul psihologiei. Peter Joseph are destule nelecturi chiar daca are intuitii valoroase (destule insa descoperite de altii in trecut...) Sunt multe alte dedesubturi psihologice de vazut dupa aceasta constatare pe care Peter Joseph nu le-a vazut clar chiar daca totusi le-a intuit. Multe sunt de spus dupa acest „stres psihosocial” insa el a pus punct si s-a oprit aici.

Un exemplu este faptul ca mediul informational si emotional toxic promovat in societatea civilizata actuala are un sens foarte concret caruia Peter Joseph pare sa nu il inteleaga. Complexele de inferioritate care imbolnavesc mintile oamenilor in fiecare secunda sunt raspandite in societate de catre mijloace specializate la fel cum undele radio se raspandesc in eter. Rolul lor este acela de a mutila sufletul sclavilor si de a-i convinge „de buna voie” sa munceasca prin achizitionarea de obiecte si falsa tehnologie (obiecte de design nou) care acopera acest complex de inferioritate si il satisfac. Desi pe moment aceste complexe de inferioritate sunt satisfacute pe termen lung shoppingul orb incorseteaza si mai tare sclavul in capcanele sclaviei deoarece el trebuie sa presteze munca in plus pentru a acoperi costul achizitionarii lor. Dincolo de latura microfamiliala descrisa de Freud eu sunt convins ca narcisismul are o latura macrosociala mult mai importanta dupa cum bine spunea in urma cu vreo 80 de ani al treilea fondator al miscarii psihanalitice Alfred Adler. In locul amenintarii cu moartea asa cum se facea in epoca clasica sistemul contemporan foloseste momirea cu narcisismul pentru recrutarea sclavilor. Mai intai sistemul ii umileste incepand cu sistemul de invatamant si apoi cu numeroasele reclame care le hartuiesc sistematic fondul psihodinamic. Narcisismul este „vindecarea” partiala a acestui complex de inferioritate introdus de cultura clasica si speculat abil catre cultura contemporana.

Rezultatul este un om care vrea din ce in ce mai mult, un om dependent dupa cum se si spune si in acest al treilea documentar. Vorbim despre un om lacom pus pe consum care, daca ar continua in acest ritm ar distruge incet dar sigur relatiile sociale cu semenii si risca sa isi distruga inclusiv planeta. Dar, dupa cum am spus mai sus natura prin natura umana are putere de a se regenera si de a se autoregla asa ca in ciuda previziunilor pesimiste eu sunt convins ca lucrurile se vor schimba in bine. Dar asta nu inseamna ca trebuie sa uitam trecutul si sa ramanem pasivi in speranta unei schimbari care ar veni fara un efort din partea noastra ci doar din efortul naturii. Lucrurile trebuie spuse pe nume foarte transant. Societatea occidentala a fost si ramane un camp imens de batalie marcata de cateva insule de calm. Fie batalie in sens propriu, fie batalie psihologica civilizatia contemporana se dovedeste a fi mai mult salbatica decat cu adevarat ceea ce se prezinta a fi prin constitutiile statelor, si numeroasele alte hartii pline de texte fie neoscolastice fie propagandistice.

„Moving forward” imi pare a fi un documentar al crizei miscarii Zeitgeist in sine pe langa a fi un documentar al crizei societatii actuale. Miscarea Zeitgeist a pornit in forta initial. Primul Zeitgeist a fost sistematic sters de catre Youtube fara sa isi dea seama ca de fapt contribuie la popularizarea lui. Dupa ce Zeitgeist Addendum a devenit celebru si dupa ce Youtube si-a dat seama ca se compromite daca continua sa stearga aceste filme Zeitgeist s-a constituit intr-un adevarat fenomen de masa. Peter Joseph a fost invitat in diferite locuri sa sustina conferinte si are chiar o emisiune radio. Zeitgeist s-a constituit intr-o miscare internationala si eu insumi am participat la intalnirile de pe Team-speak (Port: 9987 Password = tzm) . Dupa cateva luni de vorbarie si planuri de creare a Proiectului Venus lumea pleaca dezamagita si asa mereu si mereu. Oamenii vin, se implica, organizeaza diferite lucruri, apoi se plictisesc si pleaca. Adevarul este ca e prea putin de facut. Cyborgii sociali au totul, au arme, au credibilitate, au mass-media si actori care sa le ia apararea in fata multimilor. Tu care vrei sa iesi din sistem nu poti. Asta e de fapt neosclavagismul contemporan. In secolul „libertatii” poti constata ca daca e sa parasesti civilizatia actuala nu poti pleca cu bunuri din ea; poti pleca pe moment insa in scurt timp impozitele te vor deposeda de proprietatea careia, paradoxal, sistemul ii face statuie. Pentru ca de fapt sistemul capitalist nu apara proprietatea ta, ci proprietatile lor. Alea mari. Ele sunt sfinte la fel ca si ei insisi. Tu daca nu ramai sclav in continuare in sistem atunci nu vei mai avea nici o proprietate indiferent cat de mica e in comparatie cu a lor. Proprietatea ta nu (mai) e sfanta (sic!) si nu a fost niciodata! Povestea cu apararea proprietatii prin care democratia actuala se deosebeste de sistemele totalitariste e propaganda goala. Cat tupeu sa aiba exponentii capitalismului (salbatic) sa il acuze pe Peter Joseph de marxism atata timp cat elementele marxiste (acelea care privesc dictatura) si fasciste pot fi vazute atat de clar in insusi sistemul capitalist carora ei ii fac lobby si ii ascund crimele!

Intrevederi de proiecte viitoare

Pe undeva prin primavara 2010 miscarea Zeitgeist a organizat un pic cam pompos un Z-day. Zic pompos pentru ca foarte multi membri ai miscarii au fost tentati sa identifice acest Z-day cu Z-day-ul celui de-al doilea razboi mondial care a insemnat debarcarea aliatilor in Franta si o cotitura pentru desfasurarea ulterioara a razboiului. Multi au crezut ca la fel se va intampla si in societate si au plecat dezamagiti de la conferinte. Multi dintre membrii de baza au miscarii s-au retras ei insisi dezamagiti. In aceste conditii mi se pare bizara atitudinea triumfalista de final acestui documentar tinand cont de aceste probleme. Peter Joseph inca e cultural dominat de aceasta atitudine imperialista de a strange oamenii in numar mare si a porni o cruciada postrobotica impotriva traditiei. Cate iluzii din acestea s-au consumat de-a lungul istoriei! Si ingrijorarea mare este ca in acest spirit Proiectul Venus risca sa devina un nou capitalism vopsit in vorbe frumoase asa cum a fost insusi comunismul fata de burghezie. Fara puterea psihologica interioara de a ne intelege propriile noastre frustrari si sublimari, fara un insight psihanalitic proiectul Venus nu va ramane decat o iluzie. Daca dintr-o data societatea actuala ar deveni umanista, daca ar disparea amenintarile armatelor si a celorlalte institutii oamenii tot ar continua sa se streseze unul pe altul in virtutea unui pattern social intiparit timp de mii de ani in sufletul otravit al spiritului occidental. E ceva in interior ce trebuie schimbat inainte sau in acelasi timp cu schimbarea exteriorului nostru social.

Situatia nu e deloc roza iar tehnologia viitorului apropiat care pare sa inlocuiasca muncitorul in constructii asa cum e prezentata in film si chiar o viitoare omnitehnologie care sa inlocuiasca total munca sclavului asa cum o visa Aristotel acum mai bine de 2000 de ani tot nu va rezolva problema umanitatii sclavagiste. Odata cu disparitia manipularii omul se va vedea concret cat e de distrus! Abia atunci cand n-o sa ii mai spuna nimeni cat e de frumos si cat succes are in dragoste va vedea cat e de nenorocit si cata mizerie au putut lasa in sufletul umanitatii ultimele doua milenii. Atunci sa vedeti o explozie fara precedent a depresiilor si sinuciderilor! Nu pot sa fiu triumfalist la o astfel de perspectiva! Imi doresc ca toxicitatea culturala sa dispara, imi doresc ca politicienii, armata si politistii sa dispara insa istoria nu se va termina (nici) dupa acest episod. Omenirea nu va deveni o familie dupa acesti pasi in civilizatie! A ma lua de mana cu ceilalti intr-un fel de spirala yoga ce se da sfarsit de istorie mi se pare fortat. Nu-i nimic de sarbatorit! Nici la propriu nici la figurat.

Poate ai sansa sa ai o inteligenta peste media si sa primesti un job mai elevat din partea sistemului in urma unor diferite teste in asa fel incat sa scapi cat de cat de sclavagism. Oricum iti mai trebuie si cinismul de a nu-i observa pe ceilalti prinsi in aceste navoade de manipulare si control ale sistemului. Fara acest cinism nu poti promova pe scara sociala, m-am convins de asta si m-am si obisnuit cu situatia. Inghiti in sec si taci pentru ca daca protestezi vei primi sanctiuni si persecutii la locul de munca in capitalism la fel cum se intampla si in comunism. Ia spuneti dragi tovarasi capitalisti cum e cu stalinismul si cu libertatea de expresie?! In urma unei astfel de experiente iti ramane doar sa te impaci cu ideea ca sistemul e salbatic si ca trebuie sa fii circumspect la numeroasele oferte care oricand pot fi niste cai troieni. Te poti multumi macar cu gandul ca ai facut mai multe decat parintii sau bunicii tai si ca traiesti mai bine ca ei. Nu esti atat de inteligent sa treci barierele sociale si sa ajungi mai sus si nici atat de rabdator ca sa astepti „luminarea” maturitatii.

Cred ca adevarata solutie la criza sociala actuala este incetarea divinizarii metaescrocilor sociali. Dispretul majoritatii fata de minoritatea pretins elitista le poate provoca fie retragerea in turnurile lor de fildes fie acceptarea unor masuri de umanizare sociala. Nu e nevoie sa ne gandim noi la asta pentru ca se vor gandi ei mai bine. Atata timp insa cat noi insine le toleram luxul, risipa si poluarea sociala suntem si noi responsabili pentru faptele lor. Solutia este simpla: boicotarea escrocilor politici, refuzul de a da girul prin votul tau acestor cyborgi lipsiti de inima care te fura cu zambetul pe buze. Revolta de strada si violenta nu rezolva nimic. Dupa experienta Revolutiei Franceze si dupa numeroasele proteste ale muncitorilor din secolul al XX-lea acesti ucigasi ai spiritului au invatat sa le contracareze prin tehnici de dezinformare si manipulare. Proiectul Venus e mai curand o etapa spirituala decat realizarea unui oras exterior. Obsesia asta a materializarii inaintea unei abreactii spirituale chiar ca are o latura obsesionala. Forma proiectului Venus ma trimite cu gandul la celebrele mandale ale lui Jung in care umanitatea a vazut de-a lungul istoriei intruchiparea perfectiunii. Solutia e alta: Munceste mai putin – traieste mai mult! Chiar daca sistemul actual inca te obliga la a pupa in fund pe unul si pe altul ai totusi cateva atuuri pentru a te apara. Desfiinteaza-ti televizorul, radio-ul, fa-ti un prieten sau ia-ti un animal daca nu gasesti un om demn de prietenia ta!

Se poate vedea mai curand jumatatea plina decat pe cea goala. In ciuda capcanelor culturale care mi se intind (mie si tuturor) pot totusi sa ma apar; pot sa consum si sa muncesc mai putin si asta este deja o eliberare interioara inainte de orice punere in act a orasului Venus. Manipularea lor nu mai are nici un efect daca eu aleg sa nu mai fiu sclav si sa nu mai muncesc. De asemenea pot sa cumpar produse fabricate automat si sa am constiinta ca nu contribui la inrobirea vreunui sclav. Pot sa nu cumpar produse fabricate in China sau alte tari in care s-au mutat corporatiile tot din acelasi motiv. Sunt mai multe alegeri pe care le putem face pentru a ne elibera de tirania vopsit in umanism a statului contemporan.

* „Dreptul divin” era vazut ca fiind dreptul claselor superioare de a stapani pe cele inferioare.

Exemples of manipulation and obedience made by advertising and marketing

2011-01-31T13:43:00.000-08:00

Varianta in limba romana

The issue of this entry was started in the previous one

All the benefits of modern civilization are due to technology. Technology has brought really good things to humanity. The almost disappearing of classical western world Neuroses is mainly due to condoms and medicine development which allowed all sorts of sexual experiences and satisfactions with no fear for the burden of an unwanted child and no fear for sexually transmitted diseases. As I will closely show in one of the next entries morality, state of law, chances equality and kindness are due to machines that replaced old slavery. But today technology can not entirely replace the old slave. It had to change into becoming a leader and supervisor of machines. But the principles of slavery continued until today highest civilization in other forms and other plans. One of these is psychopathological consumption, excess consumption as discussed in detail in the previous entry.

Unfortunately technology (like science) can be used contrary to its evolution. The artistic design means involving lies in the object technological reality. When someone sees a sports car aggressive design that resembles with a bullet or a science fiction spacecraft such forms are used for telling false data to other people. That person uses and is used by the neoslavery social system through design to communicate her/his need to stand out on the line following the model of his ancestors who went to war and constantly threatened some communities with guns retaliation in exchange for delivering the goods. Caught in neoslavery nets ordinary contemporary man often takes this cultural refuge in the warrior phantasm of the conqueror but unconsciously and becoming the "target" advertising and marketing. Although has the illusion of fulfillness and liberations actually she/he sink down and louder neoslavery traps.

The criteria for true technology are not false performances of shape design or useless performances whatsoever. A car that looks more like a tank used not for seeing the wild nature but in particular to "impress" in urban traffic is an example of false technology. Such a fireball is an absolutely inhuman contempt of common sense as it takes place for two cars in traffic where road congestion involves daily frustrations. Nevertheless a sports car that takes the shape of a predator or of a bullet can attract the minds of primitive warriors. High speed traffic is very unsuitable and brings death and physical mutilation after the tragic events occurs rather than a genuine sharing of technology to everyone or a technological revolution.

As shown in the previous entry, advertising implies an overvaluation of the object offered for sale that show a human face a little to classical slavery by making it "voluntarily" accepted slavery by contemporary halfslave with the acceptance of consumption and price of object of the trade. Such overstatement is done either by image transfer or by dissociation from a frustrating situation. The image transfer involves a combination of two essential elements of advertising: the first is the valuable item which is a exceptional or a general elite cultural production towards the community has a particular respect; the second is the dubious item which has a bad image or low but who raises it up just by associating with a valuable item. Such a combination of two elements tend to balance each other value - dubious item takes value from the valuable item and the valuable item loses value to the dubious item. Simply placing the logo or name of an institution or corporation near to this community respect simply produces an image transfer from the valuable item to dubious item in such a way that the image perceived by the public is improved for the last one.

Dissociation from frustrating situation, solving all existential problems and personal fulfillment made possible by product acquisition is another facet of advertising. Sometimes the two sides can go parallel. Sometimes the technical and visual proximal association frame is negative situations, disasters, epidemics and other threats. In this case advertising is conducted concurrently with the news about impending disasters that bombards the subliminal dependent media slave mind. Associating directly with Traumatic Complex, the advertising is more likely to penetrate and settle in the “target” mind. I analyzed in detail the relationship between trauma and its Edenal reverse and in one of the following entries I will examine in detail the mass-media too. Such relationship is seen in the fact that human being needs greater pleasures and greater satisfactions if previously would be faced with a frustration, a nuisance, or a pain even on imaginary level only. The biggest pleasures in general are either followed or preceded by as large pains or dissatisfactions. The relationship between pleasure and pain is a retroactive one. Placing a loophole to escape within news or video content stressful or frustrating (which is the promising of false advertising), placing a Heaven in front of heavy solution of problems which appear to consumer is the key of advertising operation.

Advertising and marketing is a final stage of culture itself. As the classical culture was designed to associate and transfer its divinity and value to the power of lord in the same way the advertising associate a new technology or sports spiritual image with new lords: the corporations. Sponsorship and culture patronage are simply such developed, extended advertising on a bigger period of time. There are ads using simply a cultural production with which it is displayed even though between the two may be no logical or programmatic connections just like this one bellow:

Here's how the relationship between the traditional culture and the classical society of the lord protected by the classic army and that between advertising towards today's contemporary society of manipulation and political-corporate scam is the same. Therefore we can say without any fear of making mistakes that contemporary advertising is extending of the traditional culture.

The ad below is the prototype of advertising in general. Well done, with humor, with examples of the relationship between man and woman it has all the strengths to catch the target's attention:

The following advertisement is typical of what is advertising, marketing and PR. Such ad is meant to show black as white and that is the meaning of both today marketing and politics:

Although they advertise a brand of cigarette here is how the ad message is the opposite of reality smoking, respectively lung cancer. This ad is intended to counter warnings of smoking risks focusing on the phenomenon of bad luck. Although the wall player takes all precautions to avoid being hit, still the ad presents him only as the victim despite measures. A subliminal impression induced by this ad is this: "the precautions you take are in vain, living healthy won't help - if you're destined to die when you still die." Such an attitude makes the smoker to continue to consume tobacco enriching cigarettes companies.

That is the way the image is washed up today. You lied, you stole, you made promises without coverage and you started a war based on hidden commercial interests? It's okay! You can wash your image by manipulation professionals with a good PR strategy. With a good ad Hitler could be transformed in Jesus Christ.

As I said in the previous entry inducing idea of unlimited consumption, the acquisition of objects without any sense, but very very painful costs to the consumer work must provide for the costs of such reckless consumption is specific to contemporary society.

The irony for old things and the eternal search for new (which implies additional costs and therefore further work) can be seen in this ad:

The irony to the humble condition of the potential customer is one of the most important factors of marketing. Showing how oldfashioned and insignificant as you are and how suddenly you become important, respected and socially fulfilled is the key they use to transform you into anesthesiated manipulated consumer. It is the educational task to create further material for their success. An insecure, mentally unstable adult, shaped and humiliated by the school is the perfect target of the manipulation advertising war.

It may here be seen the crucial role of wild education in generating "genetic material" of new slavery marketing. Despite the "empowerment" of official education in civilized states, and despite its application in most cases, however, there is invisible and almost impossible to detect scope for despotism inside the behavior of teachers that perpetuate caste mentality of humiliation law class statute of those destined to become disadvantaged supporters to the wide economy. Convincing the slave to sit in "its place" and making it to do what you want since early childhood years as does the modern school - this is the real battle of contemporary neoslavery! If we add an aggressive, cynical and authoritarian teacher face then the wild education has fulfilled its purpose. That minimal almost imperceptible "margin of error" is enough to shape up contemporary halfslave hunger for affirmation and for getting out from its natural normal anonymous social state but perceived by the individual as a curse due to culture. If to these ingredients we add on the street crime [protected in "reasonable limits" (sic) by the authorities, enough obvious as to replace old armies abuses which threatened classic slave], and if we add on that discreet harassment made by public officials, and if we add on the negative news about the wars that politicians keep inventing them in different corners of the world and the illusions and we add also here the happy-end culture illusions, then we finally have the contemporary halslave general picture of “voluntarily and unhindered” doing what their lords want them to do.

Sexuality is the strongest instinct in terms of instinctual expansion in mental space. The association with sexuality and success in dealing with the opposite sex is the key of building false image of products. Forcing cultural association between sexuality and smoking counteracts the common idea that smoking cause problems with sexual health promotion and fulfillment of life. Such advertising is designed to create the false impression that the smoking is actually the promoter of the life instead of life destructor.

In the ad below one may see the combat of nerd image and the unspiritual mind of IT people. IT job stress has caused quitting the area for many specialists and so the system thought of such a method to attract others to replace them without having to increase the salaries to those already left.

Below we see a superstar image associated with the image of a product. Induction of the idea that consumption the product involves consuming star is the key for understanding this ad.

The Lamborghini car below is presented as a fighter plane of army and its aggression is ostentatious and cynical displayed including the text shape.

The average man can very easily become the victim of false technology due to advertising campaigns that acts as a decoy on him. Humiliated and pressed by the stressful task at work these people channel down the frustration into social regression to a primitive mentality of aggression and violence without realizing she/he gets into a terrible vicious circle. The huge money he/she pays for acquisition of fake technology objects is charged with more stressful jobs that cover those costs.

The ad below "target" gets the false impression that buying that car transforms it into a kind of high-class member with success to the opposite sex and with servants that parks it. In reality the purchase of such car will be indebted you to the bank or you will make you take another job to cover costs. Instead of an aristocratic life and getting out of lower class social state that simple people wants the reality of acquisition false technology leads to enslaving even more.

The following ad is a perfume commercial. Target: aggressive men, unable to socialize with a woman. The ad presents them as fatal men. The subject buys the product due to the desire to be perceived as fatal man.

Same subject, same target, same lies, only the presentation is changed:

Obvious examples are endless. There is no ad that does not frame into this deceiving pattern because all of them use that dubious exchange I talked about in the previous entry. If there would be just one ad or one product that shock down your attention and mental relaxation that would not be much. But when your attention is constantly harassed, minute after minute, our after our, day after day, month after month and year and years by such deceiving messages then there is no wonder then that modern civilized man is cautious, irritable, suspicious, cynic and ironic. After years and years of such Chinese drop supraexcitations treatment the psychodynamic system simply gets disturbed. Man no longer knows how to relax and enjoy the simple things of life that his ancestors used to enjoy. He or she is constantly unhappy by family, home, colleagues, friends and everything. In an eternal warning and suspicious about everything manipulated by advertising contemporary man gradually loses its heart becoming a robot that runs commands and forgot to live anymore. Obesity due to excessive consumption of food is one of these consequences: excessive dependence on food overconsumption combined with the food frustrations and shortages from its predecessors on genealogical line is due to these obsessive advertising messages that a person cannot escape not even in the highest mountains. Combined with past anxieties of transgenerational legacy these frustrations get ultimately create incredible range of psychiatric disorders that have exploded in recent centuries.

In a truly civilized and humanist state that treats its citizens with real respect as colleagues and not as objects or as slaves who are hypocritical called "gentlemen" commercial lies and manipulation should not be permitted. Within such a State there should be institutions to drastically control the truth and realities of a product meant for sale and not allow deceiving the buyer but to honestly tell what this product can and can’t make, what are the benefits or risks of its using and aggressive deceiving advertising should simply be prohibited.

But this is the current reality of the today social system itself. Deceiving and manipulating by advertising is an episode of complete serial of lies of today "civilized" social system. Similarly the politician is lying, similarly the policeman is lying, the officer is lying and even the academic scientist is intended to contradict or to counteract the ideas that show the perversity and falseness of modern state.

System chose profit instead of humanism. Instead of creating psychotherapists for curing children fears and for dignified education the system invested in wars and violence video games and generally war culture in order to make future adults to join the army later, besides the defense so-called and invented threats that are actually meant to threaten the slave unconscious tendency for rebellion and so halfslavery system to prosper. System studded whole world with commercials that retrograde ideas that capture slave attention so eventually hypnotize and systematic steals her/his work.

We live in a world where people deceive, mutilate and dehumanize each other only by state institutions. Humanity no longer behaves as a uniform species but the two species of hunter and hunted. So this looks less like a civilization and more like civilized painted wilderness.

Exemple de manipulare şi obedienţă realizate prin publicitate şi marketing

2011-01-31T13:25:00.000-08:00

English version here:

Tema acestui articol a fost continuata din cel precedent

Toate beneficiile civilizatiei contemporane se datoreaza tehnologiei. Tehnologia a adus intr-adevar multe lucruri bune umanitatii. Faptul ca nevrozele aproape ca au disparut din lumea occidentala se datoreaza in principal prezervativului si dezvoltarii medicinii care au permis experiente si satisfactii sexuale de tot felul fara ca partenerii sa se teama de povara unui copil venit pe nepregatite sau de bolile cu transmisie sexuala. Dupa cum voi arata in amanunt intr-unul dintre articolele urmatoare moralitatea, statul de drept, egalitatea de sanse si bunatatea se datoreaza masinilor care au permis inlocuirea vechiului sclav. Dar tehnologia nu a putut inlocui total vechiul sclav. Acesta a trebuit sa se „recalifice” devenind…conducator si supraveghetor de masini. Sclavia insa a continuat pe alte planuri si in alte forme. Una dintre ele este consumul psihopatologic, consumul in exces dupa cum am aratat in detaliu in articolul anterior.

Din pacate tehnologia (la fel ca si stiinta) poate fi folosita si in scopul contrar evolutiei sale. Designul este implicarea minciunilor artistice in realitatea obiectelor de putere tehnologica. Cand cineva este atras de un design agresiv al unei masini sport ce seamana cu un glont sau cu o naveta spatiala SF atunci aceste forme sunt folosite pentru comunicarea unor date false semenilor. Acea persoana foloseste designul si este folosita de sistemul neosclavagist prin design pentru a comunica nevoia sa de a iesi in evidenta dupa modelul stramosilor sai care mergeau la razboi sau amenintau constant anumite comunitati cu represalii armate pentru a le ceda din bunuri. Prins in mrejele semisclavagismului contemporan omul de rand se refugiaza deseori in aceasta fantasma razboinica a invingatorului devenind astfel „tinta” publicitatii si marketingului. Desi are iluzia eliberarii si implinirii el se afunda astfel de fapt si mai tare in laturile neosclavagiste.

Criteriul pentru tehnologie nu sunt falsele performante ale designului sau performantele nefolositoare. Un autoturism care seamana mai mult cu un tanc folosit nu pentru incursiuni in natura ci in special pentru a "impresiona" in traficul urban este un exemplu al falsei tehnologii. Un astfel de bolid este o sfidare absolut inumana a bunului simt prin faptul ca ocupa locul a doua masini in trafic in situatia in care aglomeratia de pe sosele produce frustrari zilnice celor implicati. De asemenea, o masina sport ce ia forma unui animal de prada sau a unui glont poate atrage spiritele razboinice si primitive. Viteza superioara in traficul urban contemporan este chiar neindicata. Ea aduceaduce moarte si mutilari fizice in urma evenimentelor tragice pe care le implica mai degraba decat o adevarata impartire a tehnologiei catre toata lumea sau o revolutie tehnologica.

Dupa cum am aratat in articolul precedent publicitatea presupune o supraevaluare a obiectului oferit spre vanzare care umanizeaza un pic sclavia clasica facand-o un fel de sclavie „de buna voie” acceptata de semisclavul contemporan odata cu acceptarea consumului si a pretului obiectului de schimb comercial. O astfel de supraevaluarea se realizeaza fie prin transfer de imagine fie prin disociere de o situatie frustranta. Transferul de imagine presupune o asociere intre 2 elemente esentiale ale publicitatii: primul este elementul valoros care consta intr-o productie culturala exceptionala sau o elita in general fata de care comunitatea are un respect special; cel de-al doilea este elementul dubios care are o imagine proasta sau scazuta dar care si-o ridica tocmai prin asocierea cu elementul valoros. O astfel de asociere intre cele doua elemente tind sa se echilibreze valoric – elementul dubios ia valoare de la cel valoros iar cel valoros pierde din valoare cedand-o celui dubios. Simpla plasare a siglei sau numelui unei institutii sau corporatii in apropierea unui astfel de respect comunitar produce un transfer de imagine de la elementul valoros la cel dubios in asa fel incat imaginea perceputa de public este una imbunatatita.

Disocierea de situatia frustranta, rezolvarea tuturor problemelor existentiale si implinirea personala cu ajutorul produsului achizitionat este cealalta fateta a publicitatii. Uneori cele doua fatete pot merge paralel. Alteori cadrul tehnic si vizual de asociatie proxima constituie situatii negative, dezastre, epidemii si diferite amenintari. In acest caz publicitatea se desfasoara concomitent cu stirile subliminale despre dezastre iminente ce bombardeaza mintea sclavului dependent de mass-media. Asociindu-se direct cu Complexul Traumatic reclama are sanse mult mai mari sa se fixeze in mintea „targetului”. Am analizat in detaliu relatia dintre traumatism si reversul sau edenic iar intr-unul dintre articolele urmatoare voi analiza in detaliu si mass-media. Astfel de relatie se traduce prin faptul ca omul are nevoie de placeri si satisfactii mai mari daca in prealabil i se provoaca o frustrare, o neplacere, o durere chiar si numai la nivel imaginar. Cele mai mari placeri in general sunt fie urmate fie precedate de dureri sau insatisfactii la fel de mari. Relatia dintre placere si durere este una retroactiva. Plasarea unei false portite de scapare din interiorul unei stiri sau unui continut vizual stresant sau frustrant (care este insasi promisiunea reclamei mincinoase), plasarea unui rai care sa para solutia problemelor consumatorului este cheia functionarii publicitatii.

Publicitatea si marketingul constituie o ultima etapa a culturii insasi. Asa cum cultura clasica este menita sa isi asocieze divinitatea si specialul ei tipica cu puterea seniorului in aceeasi masura publicitatea asociaza o imagine spirituala sportiva sau tehnologica cu noii seniori, cu corporatiile. Sponsorizarea si mecenatul cultural este o astfel de reclama dezvoltata, extinsa ca desfasurare temporala pe o perioada mai mare de timp. Exista reclame care folosesc pur si simplu o productie culturala impreuna cu care se afiseaza cu toate ca intre cele doua se poate sa nu existe nici o legatura logica sau programatica asa cum se poete vedea mai jos:

Iata cum cultura traditionala avea fata de societatea clasica a seniorului protejat de armate acelasi rol pe care publicitatea il are astazi fata de societatea contemporana a manipularii si escrocheriei corporatist-politicianiste. De aceea se poate spune fara nici un fel de teama de a gresi ca publicitatea este prelungirea contemporana a culturii traditionale.

Reclama de mai jos este prototipul publicitatii in general. Bine facuta, cu umor, cu exemplificarea relatiei dintre barabat si femeie ea are toate atuurile pentru a atrage atentia "targetului":

Urmatoarea reclama este tipica pentru tot ce inseamna publicitate, marketing si PR. O astfel de reclama arata albul ca fiind negru ceea ce este sensul marketingului.

Desi se face reclama la o marca de tigari iata cum mesajul reclamei este exact opusul realitatii fumatului, respectiv cancerul pulmonar. Reclama in cauza este menita sa contracareze avertizarile privind riscurile fumatului insistand pe fenomenul ghinionului. Desi jucatorul din zid isi ia toate precautiile pentru a nu fi lovit iata ca reclama il prezinta tocmai pe el ca fiind victima. Impresia subliminala indusa de aceasta reclama este urmatoarea: „degeaba iti iei masuri de precautie, degeaba incerci sa traiesti sanatos - daca ti-e destinat sa mori atunci tot vei muri”. O astfel de atitudine face fumatorul sa consume in continuare tutun imbogatind companiile de tigarete.

Asa se spala imaginea astazi. Asa se face imaginea astazi. Ai mintit, ai furat, ai facut promisiuni fara acoperire, ai pornit razboi cu interese comerciale ascunse? Nu-i nimic, imaginea ti se spala de catre profesionistii manipularii, cu o buna strategie de PR. Cu o reclama buna Hitler ar putea fi transformat in Isus Hristos.

Dupa cum spuneam in articolul anterior inducerea ideii consumului nelimitat, al achizitiei de obiecte fara nici o noima, dar cu costuri foarte dureroase la insasi munca pe care consumatorul trebuie sa o presteze pentru acoperirea costurilor unui astfel de consum nesabuit este specific societatii contemporane.

Ironia pentru lucrurile invechite si eterna cautare dupa nou (ceea ce implica costuri in plus si, deci, munca in plus) se poate vedea in aceasta reclama:

Ironia la adresa conditiei umile a potentialului consumator este unul dintre cei mai importanti factori ai marketingului. A arata cat esti de inapoiat si insignifiant si cum dintr-o data devii important, respectat si implinit social este cheia manipularii spre a deveni consumator anesteziat. Ramane doar rolul educatiei sa creeze in continuare materie prima pentru succesul acestora. Un adult nesigur pe el, complexat si umilit produs de scoala este tinta perfecta a razboiului manipularii prin publicitate.

Se poate intrezarii de aici rolul fundamental al educatiei salbatice in generarea „materialului genetic” pentru noul sclavagism al marketingului. In ciuda „emanciparii” educatiei oficiale in statele civilizate si in ciuda aplicarii sale in cele mai multe cazuri totusi exista o marja de despotism nevazuta si aproape imposibil de detectat in comportamentul profesorilor care perpetueaza mentalitatea de casta a umilirii si inferiorizarii celor meniti sa devina sustinatorii defavorizati ai economiei. A convinge sclavul sa stea "in banca lui" si a-l convinge sa faca ce vrei tu inca din anii primei copilarii asa cum face scoala contemporana – iata adevarata batalie a neosclavagismului contemporan! Daca la asta se adauga si o figura agresiva, cinica si autoritara din partea profesorului atunci educatia salbatica si-a indeplinit rolul. Acea minima „marja de eroare” abia perceptibila e de ajuns pentru a incepe modelarea semisclavului contemporan dornic de afirmare si iesire dintr-un anonimat natural si normal dar pe care el il percepe ca pe un blestem. Daca la aceste ingrediente adaugam si criminalitatea de strada, [protejata in „limite rezonabile” (sic) de catre autoritati, adica indeajuns de evidenta incat sa inlocuiasca abuzurile vechilor armate care amenintau sclavul clasic], daca mai adaugam si discreta hartuire venita din partea functionarilor publici, daca mai adaugam si stirile negative despre razboaie pe care politicienii se angajeaza sa le inventeze in diferite colturi ale lumii si iluziile happy-endingului avem iata tabloul general al convingerii semisclavului contemporan sa faca „de buna voie si nesilit de nimeni” ceea ce noii stapani doresc de la el.

Sexualitatea e cel mai puternic instinct in ceea ce priveste expansiunea instinctuala in spatiul psihic. Asocierea cu sexualitatea si succesul in abordarea sexului opus este cheia construirii falsei imagini. Asociatia fortata intre sexualitate si fumat produce contracararea ideii comune dupa care fumatul produce probleme de sanatate cu ajutorul ideii sexualitatii ca implinire si promovare a vietii. O astfel de reclama este menita sa creeze falsa impresie a fumatului ca promovator al vietii.

In reclama de mai jos se poate vedea combaterea imaginii de tocilar si oameni lipsiti de spirit al informaticienilor. Stresul muncii din domeniul IT i-a facut pe multi sa renunte la domeniu si astfel sistemul s-a gandit la o astfel de metoda de a-i atrage pe altii fara sa fie nevoit sa le creasca mai mult salariile celor deja ramasi.

Mai jos putem vedea imaginea unui superstar asociata cu imaginea unui produs. Inducerea ideii ca consumarea produsului implica consumul starului este cheia functionarii sale.

In reclama de mai jos masina Lamborghini este prezentata ca un avion de vanatoare al armatei iar agresivitatea este afisata ostentativ si nonsalant inclusiv ca text.

Omul de rand devine foarte usor victima falsei tehnologii ca urmare a campaniilor publicitare care actioneaza ca o momeala asupra lui. Umilit la job si presat de taskuri stresante el isi canalizeaza frustrarea recurgand la regresia sociala catre o mentalitate primitiva a agresivitatii si violentei fara sa isi dea seama el intra astfel intr-un cerc vicios teribil. Sumele enorme pe care le plateste pentru falsa tehnologie se platesc cu joburi mai stresante care pot acoperi acele costuri.

In reclama de mai jos "targetul" primeste falsa impresie ca achizitionarea respectivei masini il face un fel de membru de high-class cu succes la sexul opus si servitori care o si parcheaza. In realitate achizitionarea unei astfel de masini fie te va indatora la banca fie te va face sa iti mai iei un job pentru acoperirea costurilor. In loc de o viata de aristocrat pe care omul simplu si-o doreste si iesirea din starea de lower class el ajunge si mai inrobit.

Urmatoarea reclama este la deodorant. Target : barbati agresivi, incapabili de a socializa cu o femeie. Reclama ii prezinta ca pe niste barbati fatali. Subiectul cumpara produsul din dorinta de a fi barbati fatali.

Aceeasi tema, aceeasi tinta, aceleasi minciuni, doar forma de prezentare e schimbata:

Evident exemplele pot continua la nesfarsit. Nu exista reclama care sa nu se inscrie in acest tipar inuman pentru ca toate se regasesc si se adapa din acel schimb dubios despre care vorbeam anterior. Daca e vorba doar de o reclama sau doar de un produs care iti violenteaza atentia si relaxarea psihica doar o data asta nu ar fi mare lucru. Insa daca ceas de ceas zi de zi luna de luna si ani si ani la randul atentia ta este mereu hartuita de astfel de mesaje atunci nu este de mirare ca omul civilizat contemporan devine circumspect, irascibil, neincrezator, cinic si ironic. Dupa ani si ani de astfel de tratament cu picatura chinezeasca a supraexcitatiilor de tot felul sistemul psihodinamic se deregleaza. Omul nu mai stie sa se relaxeze si sa se bucure de lucrurile simple ale vietii de care se bucurau stramosii sai. E nemultumit de familie, de locuinta, de colegi, de prieteni de toate si de tot. Intr-o eterna alarma, suspicios pe tot si pe toate omul contemporan manipulat prin publicitate isi pierde treptat si sigur inima devenind un robot care executa si nu mai traieste. Obezitatea datorata consumului excesiv de hrana este una dintre aceste consecinte. Coroborata cu frustrarile si lipsurile alimentare ale predecesorilor pe linie genealogica, ea se datoreaza tocmai acestei picaturi chinezesti a mesajelor de consum pe care insul le aude si in creierii muntilor. Suprapusa peste angoasele trecutului mostenite transgenerational aceste frustrari ajung in final sa creeze spectrul incredibil ale tulburarilor psihice care au explodat in ultimele secole.

Intr-un stat umanist si cu adevarat civilizat care isi trateaza cetatenii cu respect ca pe niste colegi si nu ca pe niste obiecte sau ca pe niste sclavi carora li se spune in mod ipocrit „domni”, minciunile si manipularile comerciale nu ar trebui permise. In interiorul unui astfel de stat ar trebui sa existe institutii care sa controleze drastic adevarul si realitatea produsului scos pentru comercializare si sa nu permita escrocarea cumparatorului ci sa ii spuna onest ce poate face un produs, care sunt avantajele sau riscurile folosirii sale iar publicitatea agresiva si mincinoasa ar trebui pur si simplu interzisa.

Dar asta este realitatea sistemului social actual insusi. Escrocarea si manipularea prin publicitate este un episod din serialul complet al minciunilor gogonate ale sistemului social „civilizat” de astazi. In acelasi fel politicianul minte, in acelasi fel politistul minte, in acelasi fel functionarul de la birou minte si inclusiv academicianul menit fie sa contrazica fie sa contracareze ideile care arata antiumanismul si perversitatea statului contemporan.

Sistemul a ales profitul in locul umanismului. In loc sa creeze psihoterapeuti pentru temperarea angoaselor copiilor si educarea lor demna a creat jocuri video cu razboaie si violenta care sa ii faca sa se angajeze in armata mai tarziu. Pe langa apararea de presupuse si inventate amenintari acestea au rolul de a ameninta constant sclavul pentru a-l face sa nu se revolte si astfel sistemul semisclavagist sa prospere. Sistemul a impanzit lumea cu reclame si idei indobitocitoare care atrag atentia sclavului, il iluzioneaza si ii fura astfel sistematic munca.

Traim intr-o lume in care oamenii se inseala, se mutileaza si se dezumanizeaza unii pe altii cu ajutorul institutiilor statului. Umanitatea nu se mai comporta ca o specie unitara ci ca doua specii de vanator si vanat. Asa ceva seamana mai putin a civilizatie si mai mult a salbaticie parfumata.

Advertising as basic tool of the manipulation - a capital instrument for contemporary halfslavery system functioning

2010-05-27T01:55:00.000-07:00

Varianta in limba romana

More than a year ago I wrote a review about a fairly well-intentioned but wrong approach documentary: "The Century of Self". Adam Curtis, the author of this documentary claimed that contemporary consumerism manipulation and propaganda would somehow come from Freudian psychoanalysis on the basis that his grandson Edward Barnays emigrate to U.S. and become there the founder of the advertising and PR. I still think that getting to Freud from this distant hardly known nephew is a kind of empty speculation and some hint of racism because is showing the psychoanalysis itself not as an objective scientific fact but a matter of family blood. Being preoccupied for its errors and for reducing the text length at that time I did not pointed the merits of this documentary. It is now time to return to the subject to show its the good side in the very analysis that will make about contemporary phenomenon of collective manipulation techniques discovered by Freud and then diversified in various aspects by other theorists or psychotherapists.

Indeed the role of people manipulation to become maniac customer for the capitalism functioning is overwhelming and psychological knowledge from various investigative tools were generally used for this. For this issue is typical one of the psychology world famous experiment that founded the development of nowadays advertising. The experiment was done in 1957 by James Vicary who made two random groups of individuals and showed them the same movie with that difference that in a case among the movie there were flashing short video messages “Drink Coke” and “Eat popcorn”. Finally it was found that selling of cola and popcorn in the group where the film had such messages was much higher. Throughout the entire contemporary manipulation and the contemporary civilization that pretend to protect “human rights” or human dignity work on this principle. The contemporary bigger liberties halfslave won from contemporary classical slave charged with the emergence of a huge and absolutely grotesque machines manipulation of consciousness so that halfslave not to be obliged to serve any longer but to be persuaded to do so voluntarily. No matter how misguiding or suicidal would be a good idea, no matter how deceiving there would be a politician if their image is obsessively repeated then the community gets to attach to it and to like it.

Such an experiment was practically showing what first Freud theoretically analyzed with phenomenon of transfer. It involves mainly the interlocutor response of worship towards its psychotherapist. I say “mainly” because the reaction may be excessive hostility also. Although this second case is rarer, however the two feelings are homologous, similar and retroactive. I won’t get into details here on the second case because the area belongs more to psychology.

Within the psychoanalysis session Freud as a person was perceived by the interlocutor as a prophet that guesses the thoughts and talk about things that bourgeois morality of that era hid them under the rug of consciousness. Inhibition of sexual compulsion that defines the neuroticist psychopathology transforms in prophet worshipping as the therapist seemed to seek for the solutions out of state neurotic suffering. The neurotic conscience transgenerationally came from a humble social class so it psychically projected religious contents into the therapist person. Religious constructs of the interlocutor deep primitive soul gave rise to this type of worshipping and hope for liberation from suffering. The same mechanism has happened in the history of culture when the Christianity became a new type of transferential spiritual enthusiasm. Christianity promised equality of all people before God and thus this religion became ancient slave worship solution destined by classical culture to remain eternally an animal.

The right to be human (or at least man alive) was not accepted for classical slave. So called contemporary democracy has replaced the classical slave with contemporary halfslave based on this new technique of persuasion through worship. If someone worships then that person can be convinced more easily and with less expense to serve and bring profit. I pointed out in detail here the way that primitivism is a source of exploiting for “elegant manners” civilization. Emancipation is a word with unexpected blades.

Anything new gets a worship response in the consumer depth psychic level because it promises a new world, a better world, a supernatural world, a heaven. Most of the times the new objects are not entirely new, they just repeat existing technology. Their “novelty” relies on external design that is presented in a way that they give the illusion to consumers that are revolutionary technology. This is the prototype of false technologies because instead of setting slaves free as Aristotle hoped in ancient, it enslaves them more.

From an economic point of view such worship involves an overvaluation of the object of offered for sale which implies an unfair exchange. The quantity of labor offered in exchange for the purchase of that product is too high. Basically a part of such overvaluated object does not cover the natural exchange relationship. That means that this labor is done actually for nothing just like in the classic case of forced slave labor in exchange for providing a natural right that classic steals: right to life. But with the emergence of the industrial age and the number explosion of the different household objects there was a time to adjust the Christian morality that ancient slave bet almost two millenniums ago: the equal rights for all the people. Obviously as long as machines have not yet definitively replaced slave labor that ideal of equality in rights remains to be achieved in the future. The slave was not totally liberated but has won some rights more or less hypocritical and more or less applicable. At least she/ he was no longer forced to serve but only convinced to do it with the wide institutions manipulation. And for the persuasion to be effective there is rights limiting required. But with industrialization (which began with the Renaissance), he won some real rights. Escaped from the lands of feudal the classical slave slowly moved to bourgeois factories. This time was no longer threatened with a gun to work (maybe it was done rarer) and it was enticed to worship a new world, the worldwide excess of objects.

Any commercial add causes some mental distress because psychologically it translates the harassment of psychodynamic system by creating an artificial inhibition or by artificial provocation of desires. The consumer becomes a fish lured with the bait of shopping, with the obsessive collection of unnecessarily objects induced by social system metamanipulation and propaganda. The social system abuses such natural role of the general mental desire which is to balance the organism and species with the potentialities of the environment. Harassment of human desires with subtle psychological advertising does not adequately reflect the environment to which the organism report but it reflects a tricky environment designed to manipulate and persuade the consumer to harness on the work which artificially sustains a lazy and parasitic social minority. In short: this is a trap.

Advertising is often confused or intentionally and forcefully identified with transparency that governments and institutions should open to ordinary people or simply to communication itself. Many commercial offerings coming either from the Internet, either into the home mailbox or directly while walking on the street call themselves "communication" but all of them are larger or smaller degree of violation of one's intimate space. Such business behavior is positioned within the category of “aggressive marketing campaigns” even by the marketing language itself. In a world full of lies and scams that actually cancel the basic principles of communication it can be said that somebody can happily skip such "communication." Such intrusion painted in "communication" colors ends up on questioning real communication of private and personal thoughts that someone shares with friends or relatives. Officially recognized as “Communication Sciences” by the education and research official social organisms actually involve on greater or smaller degree but invariably the social manipulation and the power of lying without anyone realizing that, without being caught or condemned for it.

Advertising is not just a notice to services that can be made by someone although there was the point of beginning. Advertising today means much more than that; it means either the creation of artificial needs, or creating an artificial fear that purposes on having on consumer a psychological compulsion to acquire and consume, which is a subtle manipulation of demand and price overvaluation. The purpose is the same: the target, the buyer. The old analogy between the military organization and the organization and new factories, corporations, is exactly reflected in contemporary consumerism reality. The target is an individual with a humble pedigree either congenitally afraid of lord threats or willing to escape of everyday banalities just as her/his slaves ancestors wanted to do centuries ago. They had been left in the genetic code the need of escape from the slavery to freedom and the contemporary "target" is harassed by this compelling inner need to escape from the present into a new world.

Marketing and advertising consist of a body of actions that bring to attention false choices in the field of human ideals so that human dreams are manipulated and diverted to the contemporary commercial halfslavery. The historical need for freedom, the metaphysical need for immortality of the soul, the eternal emotional love need, the need for admiration and respect and many others are meanly exploited by commercial advertising halfslavery and attracted to the collecting of goods that replace the traditional search for these ideals.

Classical slave is generally frustrated and hungry. The almost phobic fear of poverty is the tool that contemporary halfslavery system subtle controls status the halfslaves. Inside contemporary halfslave mind the poverty is equivalent to the classic slave misfortune. The legacy of this misery is found in contemporary halfslave fear and shopping mania obsessively counteracts it. Civilization poverty is different from primitive or wildlife poverty. The civilized poor is a victim of the organ traffic, rappings, all kinds of abuses and generally to of all kinds traumatisms. Contemporary halfslave counteracts this feeling of failure and poverty through the obsessive acquisition of one more bizarre and more useless than the other objects. Obviously not the acquisition itself involves contemporary halfslavery state. Shopping is the nice part of things (although this can be questioned) but it is just the tip of the iceberg. For shopping money one need to work, to sell freedom. And this is where excess labor comes. Here is the critical point for handling modern halfslave to serve privileged social classes in contrast with the classical slave which is simply threatened with weapons to do it.

Consumerism began from the necessary and essential objects such as a house or a car, continued with the useful but not indispensable such as a mower or electric mixer and finally got to create the shopping man, the man who buys objects from the inner need to buy only as a result of continuous advertising that bombards consumer’s attention. Assiduously promoted by the stars of the day shopping has become the main mechanism of neoslavery system. Instead of getting an easier job and have more time of its own the contemporary halfslave choose paid better and more stressful job in order to pay the objects that doesn’t actually need. This kind of objects would eventually help her/him to feed a abyssal psychological ideal that somehow he/she would be a star too and thus would escape the humble condition. It is this deep mind solution that ensnares contemporary halfslave into consuming trap.

Although they are talking of a "free market" it is clear that advertising and political marketing are artificial and perverse mechanisms of discrete influencing common people in exchange for the comfort of privileged classes by artificial overvaluation of market demand. The halfslavery capitalist system abundance is just bait in the most proper sense of this term. Its role ends up into less and less freedom for the ordinary people and framing it in different forms of obedience and exploitation. Advertising reveals what is ugliest in today human being. The need to cheat and deceive, the need too lie for a certain benefit is far from a sign of a civilized society but just a poker table involving misleading faces that hide monsters came from other galaxies with a hand on cards, a hand on the chips and another on the trigger gun.

Today (pseudo)freedom and (pseudo)democracy differs from classical slavery only by this reversal of roles. Armies do not come directly to steal human property anymore and do not keep vigilant eye over the slave for preventing the escape. Classic slavery armies rob without giving something in return except for... “slave’s life" and the promise of Heaven. The modern capitalist armies do not classical rob the halfslave but constantly harass its carnal or spiritual desires by promising false solutions. This time the contemporary halfslave is lured to agree “by its own will” to provide a surplus of work to sustain the privileged classes. If classical slavery system used to threaten the slave with taking a natural right – the right to life – on the contrary the contemporary halfslavery system instead use to trick the halfslave into unfair exchange relationship for all kinds of unneeded products. Both systems have the same result: unpaid work for slave or halfslave. Overvaluation of the exchange product offered by the corporation is the halfslavery system functioning key. Advertising and its mechanisms are subtle and invisible scams; they are swindles done much better and much more efficient than the ordinary pilferer and so none notice them. In this persuade social system are involved all state institutions and all the "spiritual values" more or less directly. False technology is so the flagship of the new slavery, of the halfslavery abundance.

That is why contemporary halfslavery system panic when halfslave moves on consumerist addiction and cross the barrier into the drug space. Basically drugs attempt to throw down the drain all the state institutions work of causing discomfort to halfslave so that then could be "cured" by shopping. Drug addiction people do not buy "half measures" of consumerism preferring strong inflow of chemical satisfaction and escaping out of manipulation halfslavery gearing. All efforts of different institutions and other instruments of social system of halfslave humiliation and attract it into "VIP" consumption have a serious competitor: the drug consumption. Drugs are not as much a danger to addicted individuals as to those who can no longer count on its "good will persuasion” to accept exploitation and to be productive. Although officials are concerned about the life of addicted person still this issue is secondary and often hypocritical; in fact they are worried about losing that person as a slave caught in the straps of manipulation and consumerist scams as refugee into higher illusions of psyhoactive substance dependence. That is why powerful drugs are still illegal.

Labor itself is a natural and even funny fact as long as it remains reasonable and moderate. Man can easily survive by making a simple discreet job and so the labor becomes simply fun. Unfortunately the congenital greed of the historical social privileged ones transformed a part of society into workoholic. Work has become one of the most horrible things that classic and modern man must do. False educational and moral values are systematically planted advertising and / or classical culture in the human soul and are put there by classic and contemporary social system just to persuade people to extra work and serve the boundless greed of these social cyborgs. The human mind mutilation is the price for satisfying this social privileged hallucinating greed. The poverty of classical slave has been replaced by overconsumption of contemporary society. In its genealogical desperation contemporary halfslave finds peace with this minimum of comfort and excess consumption of food or objects that does not need. Panicked voices of its chained ancestors in that screams into its soul are provisory comforted by this the anesthetic consumption. But immoderate consumption not only produces ugly, obese and prone to diseases people due to obesity but also involves the destruction of the artificial environment to provide materials for those useless products. Contemporary civilization slave is no longer threatened by the army to accept its social state but by controlling its soul and by constant poisoning its mind. The following entry will show in detail this process and will bring some examples of commercials to support of these assertions.

The issue of this entry will continue on the next one

Publicitatea ca varf de lance al manipularii – un instrument capital al functionarii sistemului semisclavagist contemporan

2010-05-27T01:46:00.000-07:00

English version

27 mai 2010

In urma cu mai bine de un an scriam un articol recenzie la adresa unui documentar destul de bine intentionat dar gresit abordat: „The century of Self” (Secolul sinelui). Adam Curtis, autorul acestui documentar sustinea ca manipularea si propaganda consumismului contemporan ar veni cumva de la psihanaliza lui Freud pe baza faptului ca nepotul acestuia Edward Barnays emigrant in SUA a ajuns parintele publicitatii si PR-ului. Si acum consider ca a ajunge la Freud pe baza acestui nepot indepartat pe care abia l-a cunoscut e un lucru fortat si are un oarecare iz de rasism deoarece face din psihanaliza insasi nu un fapt obiectiv stiintific ci o chestiune de familie, de sange. Ocupat fiind sa ii subliniez erorile si sa reduc dimensiunea textului in acel moment nu am apucat sa ii subliniez meritele acestui documentar. Revin acum la aceasta tema aratandu-i partile bune in insasi analiza pe care o voi face largului fenomen al manipularii colective contemporane cu ajutorul tehnicilor descoperite de Freud si apoi diversificate sub diferite aspecte de alti teoreticieni si practicieni ai psihoterapiei.

Intr-adevar rolul manipularii omului simplu spre a deveni consumator maniac in functionarea sistemului e covarsitor iar cunostintele psihologice provenite de la instrumente diferite de investigare au fost folosite pe de-antregul. Din acest punct de vedere este tipic un experiment celebru pentru lumea psihologiei care sta la baza dezvoltarii publicitatii contemporane. Experimentul a fost facut in 1957 de catre James Vicary care a ales doua grupuri aleatorii de indivizi carora le-a proiectat acelasi film cu diferenta ca intr-un caz in film apareau pentru scurta durata mesajele "bea cola", "mananca popcorn". La sfarsit s-a constatat ca consumul de cola si popcorn la grupul unde filmul avusese asemenea mesaje era mult mai mare. Toata manipularea contemporana si toata civilizatia contemporana care se bate cu pumnul in piept aparand „drepturile omului” functioneaza pe acest principiu. Libertatile castigate de semisclavul contemporan fata de sclavul clasic se platesc cu aparitia unei imense si absolut grotesti masini de manipulare a constiintei in asa fel incat semisclavul sa nu mai fie obligat sa serveasca ci sa fie convins de buna voie sa o faca. Indiferent cat de inoportuna sau sinucigasa ar fi o idee, indiferent cat de mincinos ar fi un politician, in momentul in care imaginea acestora este repetata obsesiv societatea il inghite si ajunge sa se ataseze obiectul ei.

Un astfel de experiment demonstra concret ceea ce Sigmund Freud a analizat la nivel teoretic prin fenomenul transferului. El presupune in principal o reactie de venerare pe care interlocutorul o are fata de psihoterapeut. Spun „in principal” deoarece reactia poate fi si cea de ostilitate excesiva. Desi acest al doilea caz e ceva mai rar totusi cele doua sentimente sunt omoloage, similare si interconditionate. Nu insist aici pe aceasta a doua situatie deoarece tine mai mult de zona psihologiei propriuzise.

In interiorul sedintei de psihanaliza Freud parea interlocutorului un profet ce ghiceste gandurile si vorbeste despre lucrurile pe care morala burgheza ale acelei epoci le ascundea sub presul constiintei. Inhibitia pulsiunilor sexuale definitorie pentru psihopatologia nevroticista isi gasea in venerarea unui profet care parea ca le cauta rezolvarea prin gasirea de portita de iesire din starea de suferinta nevrotica. Constiinta incarcata a nevroticului provenea transgenerational dintr-o clasa umila si proiecta in persoana terapeutului continuturi psihice religioase. Constructele religioase ale sufletului primitiv al interlocutorului dadea nastere la acest tip de veneratie si speranta de eliberare de suferinta. Dupa acelasi mecanism s-a realizat adoptarea crestinismului in istoria culturii cu un nou tip de entuziasm spiritual de tip transferential. Crestinismul promitea egalitatea tuturor oamenilor in fata lui Dumnezeu si astfel a devenit solutia de venerare a sclavului antic predestinat de cultura clasica sa ramana vesnic un animal.

Sclavului clasic caruia nu i se recunostea dreptul de a fi om (sau cel putin om viu). Asanumita democratie contemporana a inlocuit sclavul clasic cu semisclavul contemporan tocmai pe baza acestei noi tehnici de convingere prin venerare. Daca cineva te venereaza atunci il poti convinge foarte usor si cu mult mai putina cheltuiala sa iti aduca profit. Am aratat in amanunt aici cum primitivismul este o sursa de alimentare pentru civilizatia „manierelor elegante” de astazi. Emanciparea e un cuvant cu taisuri neasteptate.

Orice lucru nou, nemaivazut are o reactie de venerare in profunzimea psihicului consumatorului deoarece promite o lume noua, o lume mai buna, o lume supranaturala, un Rai. De cele mai multe ori obiectele noi nu sunt noi pe de-a intregul, ele doar repeta tehnologia deja existenta. „Noutatea” lor consta in forma, in designul in care sunt prezentate in asa fel incat ii dau consumatorului iluzia ca ar fi revolutionare. Acesta este prototipul falsei tehnologii care in loc sa elibereze sclavul asa cum spera Aristotel in antichitate, dimpotriva, il inrobeste si mai mult.

Din punct de vedere economic o astfel de venerare presupune o supraevaluare a obiectului oferit spre vanzare ceea ce implica automat un schimb injust. Cantitatea de munca oferita in schimbul achizitionarii acelui produs este mult prea mare. Practic o buna parte din aceasta nu are acoperire in relatia de schimb. Adica o astfel de munca este facuta degeaba la fel ca si in cazul sclavului clasic nevoit sa ofere munca in schimbul unui drept natural pe care seniorul clasic i-l fura: dreptul la viata. Iata ca odata cu aparitia erei industriale si cu explozia numarului de obiecte de uz divers se putea ajusta morala crestina pe care sclavul antic pariase in urma cu aproape 2 milenii: egalitatea in drepturi a tuturor oamenilor. Evident ca atata timp cat masinile inca nu au inlocuit definitiv sclavul acest ideal ramane in continuare de atins. Sclavul nu a fost total eliberat ci doar a mai castigat niste drepturi mai mult sau mai putin ipocrite, mai mult sau mai putin aplicabile. Cel putin nu mai e fortat sa serveasca ci doar este convins cu ajutorul manipularii. Iar pentru convingerea sa sa presteze munca e nevoie de limitarea drepturilor sale. Insa odata cu tehnologizarea (care a inceput odata cu Renasterea) el a castigat drepturi concrete. Incet incet a evadat de pe pamanturile feudalilor si s-a mutat in fabricile burghezilor. De data asta nu mai era amenintat cu arma sa munceasca (eventual asta se facea mai rar) si era ademenit cu veneratia unei lumi noi, lumea excesului de obiecte.

Orice reclama provoaca un oarecare disconfort psihic deoarece din punct de vedere psihologic asta se traduce prin haituirea sistemului psihodinamic, prin crearea unei inhibitii artificiale sau prin provocarea artificiala a unor dorinte. Cumparatorul devine astfel un peste ademenit cu momeala shoppingului, cu achizitia obsesionala a obiectelor de care nu are neaparat nevoie insa pe care propaganda si metamanipularea sistemului social i-o induce. Sistemul abuzeaza astfel de rolul natural al dorintei in general care este acela de a echilibra organismul si specia cu potentialitatile mediului. Hartuirea dorintelor umane cu publicitatea subtila ce atinge coardele sensibile ale psihicului nu reflecta corect mediul la care organismul se raporteaza ci reflecta un mediu inconjurator inselator menit sa il manipuleze si sa il convinga sa se inhame la munci cu care o minoritate sociala lenesa si parazita prospera. Pe scurt: asta este o capcana.

Publicitatea este de cele mai multe ori confundata sau intentionat si fortat identificata cu transparenta pe care guvernantii si institutiile ar trebui sa o arate fata de omul simplu sau cu insasi comunicarea. Numeroasele spamuri si numeroasele oferte comerciale venite fie prin internet, fie in casuta postala a locuintei fie direct in timpul mersului pe strada se autointituleaza „comunicare” dar de fapt sunt grade mai mari sau mai mici de violare a spatiului intim al cuiva. Inclusiv in limbajul de marketing astfel de comportamente comerciale intra in categoria „campaniilor agresive de marketing”. Intr-o lume plina de minciuni si de escrocherii care de fapt anuleaza principiile de baza ale comunicarii se poate spune ca oricine se poate lipsi de o astfel de „comunicare”. O astfel de intruziune vopsita in „comunicare” ajunge in final sa atenteze la adevarata comunicare de ganduri intime sau personale pe care cineva le imparte cu apropiatii. „Stiintele comunicarii” recunoscute oficial astfel de catre organismele sociale abilitate din domeniile educatiei si cercetarii presupun in grad mai mare sau mai mic dar in mod invariabil manipularea si puterea de a minti fara ca nimeni sa isi dea seama si fara sa fii condamnat pentru asta.

Publicitatea nu este un simplu anunt fata de serviciile ce pot fi facute de cineva desi de acolo s-a plecat. Publicitatea de astazi inseamna mult mai mult decat atat; ea inseamna fie crearea unor nevoi artificiale, fie crearea unei frici artificiale care sa aiba ca finalitate o constrangere psihica a consumatorului de a achizitiona, ceea ce inseamna manipularea subtila a cererii si supraevaluarea pretului. Scopul acestora este acelasi: tinta, cumparatorul. Mai vechea analogie dintre organizarea militara si organizarea fabricilor si mai nou, a corporatiilor se regaseste exact in realitatea consumismului contemporan. Tinta este un individ cu genealogie umila care fie se teme congenital de amenintarile seniorului fie doreste sa evadeze din prezent la fel cum stramosii sai sclavi a dorit cu secole in urma. Acestora le-a ramas inscris in codul genetic vocatia evadarii din starea de sclav catre libertate iar "tinta" contemporana este haituita de aceasta irezistibila nevoie interioara de evadare din prezent intr-o altfel de lume.

Marketingul si publicitatea constau in ansamblul de actiuni care interpun false optiuni in campul atentiei si idealurilor umane in asa fel incat visele omului sa fie manipulate si deturnate catre semisclavia comerciala contemporana. Nevoia istorica de libertate, nevoia metafizica de nemurire a sufletului, nevoia afectiva de dragoste eterna, nevoia de admiratie si respect si multe altele sunt parsiv exploatate de catre semisclavia publicitarista si atrase catre achizitionarea de bunuri care inlocuiesc cautarea traditionala a acestor idealuri.

Sclavul clasic al trecutului era in general frustrat si prost alimentat. Teama aproape fobica de saracie este mijlocul prin care sistemul semisclavagist contemporan controleaza sufletul semisclavului zilelor noastre. In mintea sa saracia este echivalenta cu nenorocirea sclavului clasic pe care o mosteneste transgenerational. Mostenirea acestei nenorociri se regaseste in anxietatea sa iar mania shoppingului o contracareaza obsesional. Saracia civilizatiei este altceva decat saracia vietii salbatice a primitivilor sau chiar animalelor. Saracul civilizat e predispus la furtul de organe, la violuri, la abuzuri si in general la traumatisme de tot felul. Sclavul contemporan contracareaza acest sentiment de insuficienta si de saracie prin achizitionarea obsesionala de obiecte care mai de care mai ciudate si mai nefolositoare. Evident, nu achizitionarea in sine implica starea de semisclavie contemporana. Shoppingul e partea frumoasa a lucrurilor (desi si aici poate fi pus la indoiala) insa el e doar varful icebergului. Pentru banii necesari de shopping e nevoie de munca, de vindere a libertatii. Si aici intervine munca in exces. Aici este punctul critic al manipularii semisclavului contemporan spre a servi clasele sociale privilegiate spre deosebire de sclavul clasic care este amenintat pur si simplu cu armele.

Consumismul a inceput de la obiectele necesare si indispensabile cum ar fi o locuinta sau o masina, a continuat cu cele folositoare dar nu neaparat indispensabile asa cum este o masina de tuns iarba sau mixerul si a ajuns in final sa creeze omul shopping, omul care cumpara obiecte doar dintr-o nevoie interioara de a cumpara ca urmare a reclamelor continue care bombardeaza atentia consumatorului. Promovat asiduu de vedetele zilei shopping-ul a ajuns sa fie mecanismul principal al neosclavagismului. In loc sa isi ia un job mai usor si cu mai mult timp liber semisclavul contemporan isi ia un job mai stresant, mai bine platit cu care sa plateasca obiectele de care nu are nevoie. Astfel de obiecte il ajuta eventual la alimentarea unui ideal psihic abisal cum ca ar fi si el vedeta cumva si ca astfel ar evada din conditia de om umil. Tocmai aceasta solutie il prinde in capcana neosclavagismului consumist.

Desi se vorbeste despre o „piata libera” este evident ca publicitatea la fel ca si marketingul politic sunt mecanisme artificiale si perverse dar foarte eficiente pentru clasele privilegiate de influentare discreta a pietei, de supraevaluare si de supraexcitare artificiala a cererii. Abundenta oferita de sistemul semisclavagist capitalist este o momeala in cel mai propriu sens al termenului. Rolul ei are ca rezultat final lipsirea din ce in ce mai mare de liberate a omului simplu si incadrarea sa intr-o anumita forma de supunere si exploatare. Publicitatea scoate la iveala ce e mai urat in specia umana astazi. Nevoia de a escroca si de a insela, nevoia de a minti pentru un beneficiu anume atesta nu o societate civilizata ci o masa de poker la care participa fete inselatoare care parca ascund monstrii veniti din alte galaxii cu o mana pe cartile de joc, cu o mana pe jetoane si cu o alta pe tragaciul pistolului.

(Pseudo)Libertatea si (pseudo)democratia actuala se deosebeste de sclavagismul clasic tocmai prin aceasta inversare a rolurilor. Armatele nu mai vin direct sa fure bunurile omului simplu si nu mai pazesc sclavul sa nu evadeze. In cazul sclavagismului clasic armatele vin si jefuiesc fara sa dea ceva in schimb decat eventual … „viata” sclavului si promisiunea Raiului. In cazul semisclavagismului capitalist armatele nu mai jefuiesc ci hartuiesc constant dorintele carnale sau spirituale ale omului promitandu-le solutii false. De data asta semisclavul contemporan e ademenit sa accepte sa presteze o supramunca „de buna voie” care sa sustina privilegiatii social. Daca in sistemul sclavagist sclavul era amenintat cu luarea unui drept natural – dreptul la viata – in sistemul semisclavagist contemporan dimpotriva, semisclavul este pacalit la relatia de schimb pentru diferite produse de care de cele mai multe ori nu are nevoie. Ambele sisteme au acelasi rezultat: munca neplatita pentru sclav sau semisclav. Supraevaluarea produsului oferit de corporatie la schimb este cheia functionarii sistemului semisclavagist. Publicitatea si mecanismele ei intime sunt escrocherii subtile, invizibile, escrocherii facute mult mai bine decat cele ale gainarilor de rand in asa fel incat nu bat la ochi. La acest sistem de convingere contribuie toate institutiile statului si toate „valorile spiritului” mai mult sau mai putin direct. Falsa tehnologie este astfel varful de lance al noului sclavagism, al semisclavagismului abundentei.

Tocmai de aceea sistemul semisclavagist contemporan se panicheaza atunci cand semisclavul merge mai departe cu dependenta si trece bariera in spatiul drogurilor. Practic drogurile risca sa arunce pe apa sambetei toata munca institutiilor de a provoca disconfort semisclavului care apoi sa fie „vindecat” prin shopping. Drogatul nu mai cumpara „jumatatile de masura” ale consumismului preferand afluxul puternic de satisfactie chimica si astfel iesind din angrenajul manipularii semisclavagiste. Tot efortul institutiilor si diferitelor resorturi ale sistemului social de umilire a potentialului semisclav si atragere a sa in „lumea buna” a consumului au in drog un concurent redutabil. Drogurile nu sunt atat un pericol pentru individul insusi cat sunt un pericol pentru cei ce nu mai pot conta pe „convingerea lui de buna voie” sa accepte exploatarea. Desi oficialitatile se arata ingrijorate de viata drogatului aceasta problema este secundara si de cele mai multe ori ipocrita; de fapt ele sunt ingrijorate de pierderea lui ca sclav prins in chingile manipularii si escrocheriilor consumiste si refugiat in iluziile si mai mari ale dependentei de substante psihoactive. De aceea drogurile puternice sunt interzise.

Munca in sine e un lucru normal si chiar amuzant atata timp cat se face rational si cumpatat. Omul poate supravietui cu usurinta depunand o munca simpla si discreta iar jobul este astfel amuzament pur si simplu si placere. Din pacate lacomia congenitala istorica a privilegiatilor social a facut ca o buna parte a societatii sa devina workoholica. Munca a devenit unul dintre cele mai nesuferite lucruri pe care omul clasic si contemporan trebuie sa le faca. Falsele valori educationale si morale sadite sistematic de publicitate sau/si cultura clasica in sufletul omului simplu sunt puse acolo de sistemul social clasic si contemporan tocmai pentru a-l convinge sa munceasca in plus si sa serveasca aceasta lacomie fara margini a acestor cyborgi. Mutilarea spiritului uman este pretul pentru satisfacerea unei lacomii halucinante a privilegiatilor social. Consumul insuficient al sclavului clasic a fost inlocuit de supraconsumul societatii contemporane. In disperarea sa genealogica semisclavul contemporan isi gaseste linistea cu acest minim confort al consumului in exces de obiecte si alimente de care nu are nevoie. Vocile panicate ale stramosilor sai legati in lanturi care urla in sufletul sau sunt linistite provizoriu de acest consum anesteziant. Dar consumul nemasurat nu numai ca produce oameni urati, obezi si predispusi la boli datorate obezitatii dar implica si distrugerea artificiala a mediului pentru a furniza materiile prime pentru aceste nefolositoare produse. In civilizatia contemporana sclavia lui nu se mai face cu amenintarea armata ci cu controlul sufletului sau, cu otravirea constanta a mintii sale. In urmatorul articol voi arata in detaliu acest proces si voi aduce cateva exemple de reclame in sprijinul celor afirmate.

Tema acestui articol se continua in urmatorul

Despre obsesia scopului vietii

2010-04-29T11:15:00.000-07:00

Nu ideea de scop in viata conteaza ci faptul ca noi personal nu putem gasi o explicatie logica pentru viata noastra. Tocmai lipsa unei astfel de explicatii duce mai intai la concluzia ca mintea noastra e foarte limitata. Ne-o fi dus ea la stadiul de cea mai de succes specie de pe pamant dar dincolo de zona experientei posibile sau mai bine zis, a afacerilor marunte ea nu functioneaza. Pentru cineva care traieste un stil de viata boem asta e egal cu zero: „traiesc clipa si ma doare la 3 metri daca nu voi sti ce e maine sau daca nu voi sti ce se va alege de mine sau de specia mea dupa ce eu voi crapa”. Problemele existentiale apar la omul care nu traieste dupa aceste principii ci dupa scopuri si obiective, dupa principii de genul „meriti mai mult”. A nu gasi scop in viata pentru un acest om inseamna a nu-si realiza eficient jobul, a esua. Recunosc aici mentalitatea burgheza care nu poate concepe o viata normala, un „dolce fa niente” pentru ca a fost mutilata spre a deveni cat mai eficienta si cat mai profitabila. Ideea kantiana a datoriei e tipica in acest caz. Kant o imagina ca fiind superioara axiologic pasiunii, pulsiunii si instinctului in general continuand astfel narcisismului filosofului de a se crede buricul pamantului doar pentru faptul ca inventeaza niste explicatii pentru existenta lumii care rar sunt si adevarate si care pot fi eventual adevarate doar din intamplare, sub marja de probabilitate a adevarului nimerit. O intreaga mentalitate aristocrata a insistat pe acest tip de narcisism (realizat totusi in forme diferite) cu ajutorul caruia sa isi justifice parazitismul social.

Insa in situatia in care acest narcisism se dovedeste a fi dezgolit de continut si gandirea incepe sa isi dea seama de propriile sale limitari atunci incepe cosmarul existential. Filosoful cel cautator de scantei filosofale se dovedeste a fi doar un om de rand la fel ca si ceilalti iar explicatiile sale sunt simple fantezii scolastice, amestecate cu concepte.

Nu lipsa de scop al vietii e cea care darama increderea in sine a filosofului existentialist (de tip ateu) ci lipsa de incredere in explicatiile traditionale si personale la care se adauga lipsa de sustenabilitate obiectiva a acestui narcisism ce vine ca o gura de oxigen pentru mentalitatea transgenerationala umilita a filosofului. Singura consolare a educatului salbatic este aceea de a deveni si el educator salbatic la un moment dat, si de a strange in dinti cu invidie ancestrala fericirea viitorilor adulti. In acelasi fel narcisismul filosofului care gaseste scopul vietii este acea gura de oxigen menita sa umple gaurile de umilinta pe care neamul sau le-a suferit transgenerational.

Pana la urma nici macar lipsa asta de scop obiectiv al vietii nu e demoralizatoare in sine ci tocmai principiul clasic al trairii sub eterna supervizare a regulilor interne si externe. Autoritatile si supraeul sunt adevarati pedagogi salbatici gata sa limiteze, sa opreasca sa interzica ceva oricat de nesemnificativ ar fi. Acest tip paranoid de supervizare si autosupervizare permanenta e cel pe care fiinta umana civilizata nu-l mai poate suporta. Compulsia la sinucidere a existentialistilor este de fapt simptomul de sinucidere al depresivului care nu-si mai suporta autoacuzatiile venite din presiunile inregistrate de predecesorii sai de la cinismul sistemului social si sedimentate ereditar. Joaca si eterna cochetare a mentalitatii sclavului cu sinuciderea este alternativa pe care el a avut-o inca din momentul in care a fost transformat in sclav de catre armatele cotropitoare. Sinuciderea depresivului si a existentialistului este apelul final la aceasta seducatoare si fatalista alternativa mereu si mereu amanata. Sinuciderea din motive teoretice relativ la incapacitatea mintii de a gasi sensul vietii inseamna de fapt o ultima razbunare si pedeapsa a Supraeului fata de ineficienta mintii de a gasi si pune in practica astfel de raspunsuri SF pentru a impresiona muritorii.

War: the most profitable business

2010-03-29T06:42:00.000-07:00

Varianta in limba romana

Civilization has been built with the war. Basically some armies conquered and pillaged some primitive communities and have turned its members into slaves. Slaves were forced to work, to produce goods required for living, food or labor to build castles and cathedrals. That is civilization! Looks really revolting that our wonderful contemporary world has so garbage at its base but the most outrageous is that this rubbish is still part of it.

State constitutions and their official ideologies claim some absolutely empty formulas designed only to shape up an image, to create servants false illusions and to keep them serve on. Among many such bullshits I mainly notice no content words like "national unity" or "national unitary state." As broken from the Hegel’s anesthetic philosophy these formulas gives the false impression that between servant and master is the same relationship of cooperation as between members of a sport team.

But any national state has a capital developed around the lord / king palace and a province that includes primitive community systematically abused and exploited under the threat of military troops. The relationship between lord and slave is that of theft. Such crime is beautifully embellished with the institutions and the idea of nation is one of those modern myths designed to mend up an inhumane practice.

Slaves have always had the option of suicide from the moment he chose to continue living as a slave rather than die in battle or commit suicide even from the start. The regrets about life choices that common people has taken are mentally governed by this original decision taken by their ancestors on their behalf. Transgenerationally smoulder inside slave revolt is a halfsuicidal act because it returns to the original deal done thousands of years ago between their ancestors and their contemporary tormentors’ ancestors. With the war there are bound together (condensed) psychological affects as frustration about the fact of being systematically deceived by the authorities, fear of reprisals in which the ancestral Traumatic Complex acts but also the early education cultivated love for all of these monstrosities.

There are two levels that common people relate with war. First is the simple frustration that involves the obedience to authorities. The prospect of a war simply attenuates this kind of person rebellion tendencies and disobedience so becoming more docile and more profitable. The other level is that of the increased frustration threatening to escalate into riots. The halfslavery system keeps inventing wars again and again in order to absorb common people’s frustration and point it to abstract enemies so covering the image of social vampires that usually cripple down their existence.

We know that war is the most profitable business because it certifies a looser- winner type relationship where the looser is that who is threatened by loosing life. At this point the servant faces a critical decision that its ancestors took it in past centuries: either win and take booty or die in war. Social injustice or social abuses no longer counts. All that matters in this particular moment is survival: everything is focused winning the war. Worker's mind gets hot and begins to function anesthetic and impersonal like Sisyphus described in the depressive existentialists’ texts. The worker transforms into an animal that fights for her/his life with the survivor motivation.

War began to artificially be induced as a very subtle way to attract and control any rebellion on the authorities within the social system. Instead the slaves to rebel against masters as happened to Spartacus phenomenon civilization learned to pit them against each other and to neutralize each other in the battlefield.

The analysis can go further ahead up to the psychoanalysis moral masochism: the small daily frustrations that the worker feels need a “spell it out”, an abreaction, an artificial provoking anger avalanche through the war perspective. That is the real fear, which is a kind of cocaine of human anxieties. Sports games and sports hooliganism can somehow attract and implement into act such primitive aggressive impulses of the human soul. The bustle of the contemporary stadiums is the bustle of old armies fighting in galactic confrontations. Modern culture, the paparazzi phenomenon is meant to attract the early slave hate to its social vampires, the authorities. Channeling the slave anger out of those who profit directly from its state is not only meaning of war but it is the meaning of all social institutions and culture together.

Human civilization seems to be continuously threatened by something and corporatist propaganda professional made by the U.S. and gradually taken by the other civilized countries peaked in the invention of such threats and artificial disasters production to keep down the contemporary slave into psychological bondage. In the past, but still today community support for the army is justified by foreign threats. If there is not any then they are artificially induced by politicians’ specific corrupt methods.

From simple other language speakers to Nazis, to Communists, the Arabs terrorists and (lately) alien invaders media propaganda system spread these warrior messages to keep the contemporary halfslave in the alert and productive state of mind. War was and still remains the most profitable business affairs as business themselves are some nice little embellish wars.

Războiul: cea mai profitabila afacere

2010-03-29T06:40:00.000-07:00

English version

Civilizaţia s-a construit cu războiul. În speţă nişte armate au cucerit şi au jefuit nişte comunităţi primitive şi i-au transformat pe membrii ei în sclavi. Sclavii au fost puşi la muncă, au produs bunuri necesare traiului, hrană, au construit castele şi catedrale. Asta este civilizaţia! Pare cu adevărat revoltător că lumea noastră minunată de astăzi are atâtea gunoaie la bază însă şi mai revoltător este că aceste gunoaie fac încă parte integrantă din ea.

Constituţiile statelor şi ideologiile lor oficiale susţin câteva formule absolut goale de conţinut menite doar să formeze o imagine, să creeze iluzii servitorilor pentru a servi în continuare. Dintre multe astfel de cretinisme remarc în principal „unitatea naţională” sau „statul naţional unitar”. Rupte parcă din filosofia anesteziantă a lui Hegel aceste formule lasă falsa impresie cum că între servitor şi stăpân are exista o relaţie de cooperare la fel cum există între membrii unei echipe sportive.

Şi totuşi orice stat naţional are o capitală care se concentrează în jurul palatului seniorului /monarhului şi o provincie care presupune comunitatea primitivă abuzată militar şi exploatată sistematic sub ameninţarea armatelor. Relaţia dintre senior şi sclav este una de furt. O astfel de crimă este frumos cosmetizată cu ajutorul instituţiilor iar ideea de naţiune este unul dintre aceste mituri contemporane menite să cârpească o realitate inumană.

Sclavul are mereu perspectiva sinuciderii pe care a avut-o încă din momentul în care a ales să trăiască în continuare ca sclav în loc să moară în bătălie sau să se sinucidă încă de la început. Regretele pe care omul în general le are faţă de alegerile luate în viaţă sunt guvernate de această decizie originară luată de strămoşii lui în numele său. Revolta care mocneşte transgeneraţional în el este o semisinucidere deoarece el se reîntoarce astfel la târgul originar încheiat poate mii de ani în urmă între strămoşii săi şi strămoşii călăilor săi contemporani. Cu ajutorul războiului sunt îmbinate (condensate) la nivel psihologic afecte ca frustrarea sa faţă de faptul că e furat sistematic de autorităţi, frica de represalii care acţionează ancestralul său complex traumatic dar şi dragostea cultivată educaţional prin manipulare timpurie pentru acestea.

Există două grade de relaţionare a omului simplu cu războiul. Primul este cel al frustrării simple care atrage supunerea faţă de autoritate. Perspectiva unui război îi atenuează omului simplu tendinţele spre revoltă şi nesupunere devenind mai docil şi mai profitabil. Celălalt este cel al frustrării accentuate care riscă să degenereze în revoltă. Inventând mereu şi mereu războaie sistemul semisclavagist absoarbe frustrarea omului de rând şi o canalizează către inamici invizibili acoperind astfel imaginea vampirilor sociali care îi mutilează perpetuu existenţa.

Se ştie că războiul este cea mai profitabilă afacere pentru că ea certifică o relaţie de tip winnner-looser, unde looserul este cel ameninţat de pierderea vieţii. În acest moment muncitorul se află în faţa unei decizii capitale pe care şi strămoşii lui au luat-o în secolele trecute: fie învingem şi luăm pradă de război, fie murim în război. Nu mai contează nedreptăţile sociale, nu mai contează abuzurile sistemului. Tot ce contează în acest moment e supravieţuirea: totul pentru front totul pentru victorie. Mintea muncitorului se înfierbântă şi începe să funcţioneze anesteziant şi impersonal asemenea unui Sisif descris în textele existenţialiştilor. Muncitorul devine din om un animal care luptă pentru viaţa sa cu motivaţia supravieţuitorului.

Războiul a început să fie indus artificial ca o formă foarte subtilă de a atrage şi controla eventualele revolte asupra autorităţilor din interiorul sistemului social. În loc ca sclavii să se revolte asupra stăpânilor aşa cum s-a întâmplat cu fenomenul Spartacus civilizaţia s-a deprins să îi asmute unii împotriva altora şi să se neutralizeze reciproc în câmpul de bătălie.

Cred că se poate merge cu analiza mai departe pe drumul aşanumitului masochism moral despre care vorbeşte psihanaliza: micile frustrări cotidiene pe care muncitorul le resimte au nevoie de un spell it out , de o abreacţie, de o provocare artificială a avalanşei prin perspectiva războiului. Asta e adevărata frică, un fel de cocaină a anxietăţilor umane. Jocurile sportive şi huliganismul sportiv mai pot oarecum atrage şi pune în act aceste impulsuri agresive primitive ale sufletului uman iar forfota stadioanelor e forfota vechilor armate cuprinse de înfruntări galactice. Cultura mondenă, fenomenul paparazzi sunt în măsură să atragă şi ele ura incipientă a sclavului faţă de vampirii săi, autorităţile. Canalizarea urii sclavului în afara celor care profită direct de pe urma stării sale este sensul nu doar al războiului ci a tuturor instituţiilor sociale şi culturii la un loc.

Civilizaţia umană pare mereu ameninţată de ceva iar propaganda corporatistă făcută profesionist de SUA şi preluată treptat şi sigur de celelalte ţări civilizate a atins apogeul în inventarea unor astfel de ameninţări şi producere artificială de dezastre pentru a ţine sclavul contemporan într-o robie psihologică. În trecut dar şi astăzi susţinerea unei armate de către comunitate se justifică prin ameninţările străine. Dacă nu există atunci ele sunt induse artificial prin metodele specifice politicienilor.

De la simplii vorbitori de altă limbă la nazişti, la comunişti, la teroriştii arabi şi (mai nou) extratereştrii invadatori sistemul de propagandă mass-media răspândeşte aceste mesaje războinice care să ţină semisclavul contemporan în stare de alertă şi productivitate. Războiul a fost şi va rămâne cea mai profitabilă afacere aşa cum afacerile însele sunt nişte războaie ceva mai frumos cosmetizate.

Terrorism as a pillar of state

2010-02-25T09:40:00.000-08:00

Aici variana in limba romana

The ordinary contemporary people had become conscious about their own power and ability to react to systematic traditional threats form authorities. The fact that marginalized communities have also learned to use weapons and to respond to abuses is due to simple emancipation that has widely spread into contemporary civilized mentality. Feeling discriminated and wronged ordinary people suddenly took their fate in their hands and become unmanageable. The attacks made by ordinary people against officials and privileged ones often happened in 20th century. That was one issue among others that led more freedom and more respect for them. Authorities began to fear more and more by ordinary people capacity to respond with violence to everyday life frustrations. For this reason they have developed those deceiving theories about Pacific war, about the so-called good official violence and about the bad violence of those who do not do it systematically.

What simply irritates about the image of terrorism spread on all media channels is not that the terrorists are actually "good guys" as they claim but the fact that the authorities show themselves as the "axis of good" in a kind of traditional battle between evil with good. A formula like "axis of evil" used by G. Bush is designed to operate in these parameters as long as receptors have a classical dualistic mentality or even primitive one. If it is demonstrated that enemy is bad than such a mentality will perceive the enemy’s opponent as good. Each of the sides justifies their own angelic face showing the devilish face of the other one.

Fighting against terrorism is a strategy designed to create in citizens’ mind the peaceful image of authorities looking like a kind of diaphanous virgins sent to earth by God to fight against evil forces. Causal and exhaustive analysis reveals that this is one of the largest deceptions that any officials ever released to manipulate and distort reality.

The official version that presents the terrorists as devils and authorities as angels used to be implemented in various layers of society with the old methods of Inquisition. In America there was absolutely incredible situation where the unconditional non-acceptance of this official variant could be simply classified as terrorists support or even as terrorism acts itself which is very similar to Inquisition.

War practiced in the past and present too by states authorities is nothing but a generalized terrorism, a terrorism accepted by all state resorts. Equally terrorism is a limited war, a war involving only part of the community members. Terrorism is far from being a 20th century specific phenomenon. It was practiced by authorities centuries ago and still practiced with nonchalance today in the whole society. The difference between these kinds of terrorism is that a huge propaganda machine convinces us (or not) that the practice of the organized and diffuse terrorism of authorities is good but the one practiced by more rudimentary means by amateurs is bad.

Terrorism as it exists today is simply a small version of today bellicose society. The only difference between terrorism and war is that the first is done by amateurs while wars are made by professionals with tradition. Promoting limited concept of "terrorism" only to non-professional level, for those who decide to take gun in hand and react to the big and professional terrorism practiced by state is part of the older strategy of focusing the hate of citizen out of the true social vampires and redirects it to a sort of undefined so-called devilish forms. The term terrorist rings profitable for the authorities in the ears of the slaves scared of psychological war they endured for thousands of years until today. False ideas about the "axis of evil" strengthen the police state and shackle the common people under the pressure of their own professional terrorists hided under the heroic image of army than of the pressure of the amateur terrorists elsewhere.

These artificial distinctions between war and terrorism are simply propaganda for reinforcing the fruitful police state automatically derived from "war against terrorism". Differentiation made by corporatist and politicians propaganda between state official professional war and terrorism practiced by "hostile groups" can be easily logically rejected. Such lawyer pleadings sustain that the difference between them is that the war would avoid civilians while terrorism would point the civilians as first target. In reality the fact that more civilians are dying in amateur terrorists’ attacks happens because the authorities have created a vast apparatus of protection and so they can not actually reach them. If they would have to choose they would certainly choose officials instead of civilian targets. On the other hand the official war itself was using civilians as bargaining table until yesterday. The fact that in the recent Middle East wars army slaughtered civilians in the lot shows that half a century can not change habits related to hundreds of thousands of years. The fact that for these atrocities were sentenced as scapegoats some poor soldiers who simply obeyed to superiors orders does not change much.

The bedtime stories about the protection of civilians in wartime are actually authorities’ empty words. Wars are primarily made for civilians. They are made either to take over or govern or to motivate work production or to pick up those with a tendency to rebel and move them with toys in an authorities’ favorable area rather than confront them in a potential revolt of the masses. Beauty, discretion and convenience of civilization are based on these underground channels where dirt reached a unprecedented levels in the history of life. How long was since the launch of the bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Was it a little more than half a century? The half-century is worth a second in global history.

Just to see how false is the distinction between war as a struggle between professional armed only and terrorism as a struggle between the professionals armed and civilian unarmed I think it is time to think of the largest terrorist act in history. Responsible for this nr.1 act of terrorist is not Al-Qaeda nor ETA nor IRA but U.S. authorities at the end of the Second World War, when they cut off of earth the cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. At that time 200,000 civilians women and children were killed from their nuclear bombs and hundreds of thousands were wounded and traumatized. How can U.S. authorities talk about the “axis of evil” and the war against terrorism when they have done most heinous terrorist act of all times? How can they be such insensitiveness? How can somebody be so infamous to declare oneself willing spread democracy in third world countries and pretending as being some kind of God on the Sistine Chapel?

It is not right to compare the number of dead as authorities do with their cynical reflection of seeing ordinary human being as an object or cattle that is counted and labeled. But even after their inhuman criteria of theirs the number of Nagasaki and Hiroshima victims is about 20-th time bigger than all the registered victims of nongovernmental terrorism throughout history. How many died at the WTC 9/11? 3000?

I know the false and inhuman reasons of authorities relative to this event. War ended soon ... Free elections ... Democracy ... They are all empty words! These values are identical to those of nongovernmental terrorists like ETA or IRA. As these organizations fight to have a territory from which to extract taxes so the official terrorists of U.S. want to expand their empire and to collect taxes from other territories. Actually the story about the implementation of democracy in the Middle East has the main intention to take out the Arabs from mosques and to put them in the casinos and corporations. The reasons of justifying the largest terrorist act in history (Nagasaki and Hiroshima) is reduced to one sentence: the will of the authorities is sacred while of the simple people will is not important ... The 200 000 innocent of Nagasaki and Hiroshima were anonymous while those 3000 Financial and corporate were elite (sic!)...

War on terror actually proves to be a tautology first because terrorism is spiral fueling and fueled by the war. Then this so-called war is a contradiction in terms since the war and terrorism is one and the same thing that reinforces and supports each other and does not in any case cancel each other.

Simple terrorists are amateurs and that can be seen in all their actions. They are not clever enough to create events like Pearl Harbor or 9 / 11 or to control the media as the organizers of official war do. Terrorists skip this part and go straight to the facts. Only with years of experience they begin slowly to blackwhite it with learning strategies of manipulation public opinion and other things. For example, ETA has come to be represented in the Spanish parliament and so the IRA in Irish parliament. This is a minimum education that terror professionals give to the amateurs. Gradually so-called war against terrorism becomes a wonderful win-win terrorism partnership and the job is done organized.

The authorities need terrorists in the same way as the armies need other “enemy armed forces” to demonstrate their artificial usefulness and counter the image of their primary mission: the key role of negotiating the relationship between masters and slaves. Without external threats the police and propaganda state could not justify itself, would be abolished and then hardly would find “freewilling” slaves to support system because none would force them to be slaves no more.

The main mission of the armies and terrorism and mafia is not to protect us from enemies, aliens or other threats that are presented as willing to colonize us. This is just a specific strategy to protect and raise the fee from the weaken ones and to justify one of the most horrible crime that human kind can make. The main mission of armies is to threaten and even bathe in the blood the slave revolt even if such a situation happens once in a century in civilized countries and several times in the others. For example in Romania this has happened at the 1907 peasant uprising and at the 1989 revolution against the communist dictatorship. In the first case the army succeeded suppressing peasant revolt but in the second it only tried but returned weapons as soon as the international public opinion has hinted that supports change and quickly become people’s army.

The best known case of army terrorism against its own citizens in the civilized world is 1930-1940 Germany where workers strikes had led to access the power of a war party. But because the system could not conceive a civilized society plan of drowning workers in blood (right to strike was guaranteed also at that time) then a general psychical sublimation happened and workers were replaced by Jews.

Obviously the system is trying hard to cover such events as well as the conscious deals with unconscious which I will examine in detail the following entry. Sublimation and reactional formation are psychoanalytic concepts that precisely apply to this case. Politicians shake from time to time to create situations of conflict or inventing wars with other states or communities to artificially create the image of the army as military protection institution for citizens. Everyone thinks about the huge costs of maintaining armies and classical and primitive specific mentality of those join them and everyone would think about reducing such costs. But the prospect of war with a neighboring state just tempers any tendency to restructure the state. Unfortunately this is the interest of authorities and citizens swallow with no reflection such manipulations coming from them. Very few ask themselves some more how it would be with no armies all over the world whatsoever.

Other discussions are pointless: the system still needs slaves so long as Aristotle's ancient dream of replacing slave free with machines is only partial achieved. And a slave can not be persuaded to execute master orders if there is no terror. Today manipulation is basically supported function also by terror but I will write about this differentiation in my futures entries.

Contemporary civilized society today can not exist without war yet just like the classic one from which is trying to separate. War scares worker and makes it very productive to gather supplies for poverty times just like an ant does thinking about winter. Obviously, such a framework is perfect for the rich world that gets richer and stronger from anxiety caused by the prospect of war.

Contemporary slave would be a lazy and passive primitive creature leading an easy life if there won’t be any military threat. That is very unproductive and very uncreative. Along with education and justice system the war institution join this deep and systematic mass manipulation of transformation the primitive believes into contemporary slavery. If the army was used in the past for robbery and classical slavery today the institutions of war is more used to keeping contemporary slaves under control and counteract their possible revolt. State armies fight with terrorism is actually a struggle for domination. But the stakes are the same: some territories conquered slaves to master. IRA and ETA wanted own country to master.

We live in a society still warlike although several people have come to loathe and detest military clothes and mentality. We are indoctrinated with militarism. We are threatened directly or indirectly by rough unprofessional terrorists and veiled by state professional terror of armies. Cities are suffocated with statues representing large armies’ leaders, traditional heads of state terrorism. Center of the classical composition of art sublimates actually the commander of armies into a point. The divinity of traditional religions and their prophetic figures are also some centers of interest that overevaluate the powerful against the weak and defenseless. Discrimination and abuse will not be eradicated as long as there will be classical culture and the military. Warrior mentality of destruction or enslaving other community is part of civilization spirit and no personal or collective success can be conceived at this time of culture without such consequences.

In each state there is a ministry of the army pompously and embellished called the Ministry of National Defense. But if honesty would be an attribute of a functioning modern state than the ministry would not be named Ministry of National Defense but simply the Ministry National Terrorism. I think armies are the main tool of states for dividing the world into golfers and hospital patients. I do not think that we should not look more for the origin of mental disorders described in treated hundreds of thousands of pages. From this moment it is hypocrisy to accept the “infant stages of libidinal evolution” theory proposed by Freud and further developed by other psychoanalysts with no interests in social illness that grinds our minds since early childhood. In the next entry I will make a more detailed analysis of psychopathological consequences arising from such a state of facts.

Terorismul ca pilon al functionarii statului

2010-02-25T09:30:00.000-08:00

english version here:

25 02 2010

In era contemporana omul de rand a cam devenit constient de propria forta si capacitate de a riposta la amenintarile traditionale sistematice ale autoritatilor. Faptul ca comunitatile marginalizate au invatat si ele sa foloseasca armele si sa reactioneze la abuzuri se datoreaza emanciparii simple care s-a raspandit in mentalitatea omului simplu odata cu tehnologizarea. Simtindu-se discriminat si nedreptatit omul de rand si-a luat soarta in maini si a devenit de nestapanit. Secolul 20 a abundat de atentate facute de omul simplu la adresa oficialilor sau privilegiatilor sociali. Asta a fost o cauza printre altele pentru care omul contemporan a primit mai multe libertati si mai mult respect. Autoritatile au inceput sa se teama din ce in ce mai mult de capacitatea omului de rand de a raspunde prin violenta frustrarilor de zi ci zi. Din acest motiv ele au dezvoltat inselatoarele teorii despre razboiul pacificant, despre violenta oficiala pretins buna si despre violenta rea a celor care nu o fac sistematic.

Ceea ce irita pur si simplu la imaginea care se face terorismului pe toate canalele mass-media nu este faptul ca teroristii ar fi de fapt „baietii buni” asa cum sustin ci faptul ca autoritatile insele vor sa para „axa binelui” in aceasta traditionala lupta a raului cu binele. O sintagma de genul „axa raului” folosita de G. Bush este menita sa functioneze in acesti parametri atata timp cat receptorii au o mentalitate dualista clasica dar chiar primitiva. Daca se demonstreaza ca inamicul e rau atunci o astfel de mentalitate percepe oponentul inamicului ca bun. Fiecare dintre tabere isi justifica propria calitate angelica incercand sa o diabolizeze pe cealalta.

Lupta impotriva terorismului e o strategie de imagine menita sa formeze in mintea cetateanului ideea cum ca autoritatile sunt pasnice, cum ca nu ele sunt niste fecioare diafane trimise de Dumnezeu pe pamant pentru a lupta contra raului. Analizate cauzal si exhaustiv observam ca asta e una dintre cele mai mari marsavii care a fost lansata vreodata de vreun oficial pentru a manipula si distorsiona realitatea.

Varianta oficiala dupa care teroristii sunt diavoli si autoritatile sunt ingeri a ajuns sa fie implementata in diferitele resorturi ale societatii dupa metodele vechii inchizitii. In America s-a ajuns la absolut incredibila situatie in care simpla neacceptare neconditionata a acestei variante oficiale sa fie clasificata pur si simplu de simpatie cu terorismul si chiar ca terorism in sine ceea ce deja nu mai poate fi deosebit de inchizitie.

Razboiul practicat in trecut si inclusiv in prezent de autoritatile statelor nu este altceva decat un terorism generalizat, un terorism acceptat de toate resorturile statului. In aceeasi masura terorismul este un razboi restrans, un razboi in care sunt implicati doar o parte din membrii comunitatii. Terorismul nu este nici pe departe un fenomen specific secolului al 20-lea. El s-a practicat de autoritati si se practica in continuare cu nonsalanta si astazi la toate nivelurile societatii. Diferenta dintre ele consta in faptul ca un urias aparat de propaganda ne convinge (sau nu) ca a practica un terorism organizat si difuz al autoritatilor e bun pe cand acela practicat cu mijloace mai rudimentare al amatorilor e rau.

Terorismul asa cum apare el astazi este pur si simplu o varianta la nivel restrans a societatii razboinice contemporane cu diferenta ca este el este facut de amatori in timp ce razboaiele contemporane sunt facute de profesionisti cu traditie. Promovarea conceptului restrans de „terorism” doar la nivelul neprofesionistilor, a celor care decid sa ia si ei arma in mana si sa reactioneze in fata terorismului profesionist practicat de stat face parte din acea mai veche strategie de canalizare a focalizarii urii cetateanului dinspre adevaratii vampiri ai societatii catre forme nedefinite de babau. Termenul de terorism suna profitabil pentru autoritati in urechile sclavilor speriati de razboiul psihologic la care sunt supusi de mii de ani pana astazi. Ideile mincinoase despre „axa raului” intaresc statul politienesc si sclavul mai mult se incatuseaza sub presiunea propriilor teroristi profesionisti acoperiti sub imaginea eroica a armatei decat sub cea a teroristilor amatori de aiurea.

Aceste artificiale diferentieri intre razboi si terorism au mai mult rol de propaganda pentru a intari profitabilul stat politienesc ce deriva automat de pe urma „razboiului impotriva terorismului”. Diferentierea facuta de propaganda corporatista si politicianista intre razboiul oficial si profesionist al statului si terorismul practicat de „gruparile ostile” poate fi foarte usor demolata logic. Aceste astfel de adevarate pledoarii avocatesti sustin ca diferenta intre ele ar fi aceea ca razboiul ar ocoli civilii pe cand terorismul ar avea ca prima tinta insisi civilii. In realitate faptul ca mor civili mai mult este pentru ca autoritatile si-au creat un vast aparat de protectie si astfel teroristii nu prea pot ajunge la acestia. Daca ar avea de ales, majoritatea „teroristilor” ar alege oficiali si nu civili ca victime. Pe de alta parte insusi razboiul a folosit pana mai ieri civilii ca masa de negociere. Faptul ca in recentele razboaie din orientul mijlociu armata care a macelarit civili la gramada atesta ca intr-o jumatate de secol nu se pot schimba apucaturi ce tin de sute de mii de ani. Faptul ca pentru aceste atrocitati sunt scosi capi ispasitori si au fost condamnati niste bieti soldatii care au ascultat de ordinele superiorilor nu schimba mare lucru.

Aceste artificiale diferentieri intre razboi si terorism au mai mult rol de propaganda pentru a intari profitabilul stat politienesc ce deriva automat de pe urma „razboiului impotriva terorismului”. Diferentierea facuta de propaganda corporatista si politicianista intre razboiul oficial si profesionist al statului si terorismul practicat de „gruparile ostile” poate fi foarte usor demolata logic. Aceste astfel de adevarate pledoarii avocatesti sustin ca diferenta intre ele ar fi aceea ca razboiul ar ocoli civilii pe cand terorismul ar avea ca prima tinta insisi civilii. In realitate faptul ca mor civili mai mult este pentru ca autoritatile si-au creat un vast aparat de protectie si astfel teroristii nu prea pot ajunge la acestia. Daca ar avea de ales, majoritatea „teroristilor” ar alege oficiali si nu civili ca victime. Pe de alta parte insusi razboiul a folosit pana mai ieri civilii ca masa de negociere. Faptul ca in recentele razboaie din orientul mijlociu armata care a macelarit civili la gramada atesta ca intr-o jumatate de secol nu se pot schimba apucaturi ce tin de sute de mii de ani. Faptul ca pentru aceste atrocitati sunt scosi capi ispasitori si au fost condamnati niste bieti soldatii care au ascultat de ordinele superiorilor nu schimba mare lucru.

In general povestea despre protectia civililor in timp de razboi sunt de fapt niste vorbe goale ale autoritatilor. Razboaiele sunt facute pentru civili in primul rand. Ele sunt facute fie pentru a-i acapara si guverna, fie pentru a-i motiva in productie fie pentru a-i culege pe cei cu tendinta de revolta armata si de a-i muta cu jucariile intr-un loc favorabil autoritatilor mai curand decat sa se confrunte cu ei intr-o potentiala revolta a maselor. Frumusetea, discretia si comoditatea civilizatiei se bazeaza pe aceste canale subterane unde mizeria atinge cote de neintalnit in istoria vietii. Cat timp a trecut de la lansarii bombelor de la Nagasaki si Hiroshima? Un pic mai mult de o jumatate de secol? In istorie o jumatate de secol valoreaza cat o secunda.

Ca sa putem intelege cat de mincinoasa este aceasta distinctie intre razboiul ca lupta intre profesionisti inarmati numai intre ei si terorismul ca lupta intre profesionisti inarmati si civili e cazul sa ne gandim la cel mai mare act terorist din istorie. De savarsirea acestui act nu este raspunzatoare nici Al-Qaeda nici ETA nici IRA ci autoritatile americane la sfarsitul celui de-al doilea razboi mondial cand au ras de pe fata pamantului orasele Nagasaki si Hiroshima. Au murit atunci peste 200 000 de civili cu batrani femei si copii de pe urma bombelor lor nucleare plus alte sute de mii de raniti si traumatizati. Cum mai pot ele autoritatile americane sa vorbeasca despre „axa raului” si razboi impotriva terorismului cand ele au facut cel mai atroce act terorist din toate timpurile? Cum poti sa ai o asemenea nesimtire? Cum poti sa mai fii atat de nemernic si sa declari ca vrei sa raspandesti democratia in statele din lumea a treia pretinzandu-te ca esti un fel de Dumnezeu de pe Capela Sixtina?

Razboiul impotriva terorismului se dovedeste de fapt mai intai a fi o tautologie deoarece spirala terorismului este alimentata de razboi. Iar apoi un astfel de presupus razboi este o contradictie in termeni deoarece razboiul si terorismul sunt unul si acelasi lucru care se intaresc si se sprijina reciproc si in nici un caz nu se anihileaza reciproc.

Nu este in regula sa comparam numarul de morti asa cum il fac autoritatile din reflexul lor cinic de a vedea omul ca pe un obiect sau ca pe o vita ce se numara si se eticheteaza. Dar chiar si dupa acest criteriu inuman specific lor numarul victimelor de la Nagasaki si Hiroshima depaseste de vreo 20 de ori numarul de victime ale terorismului neguvernamental consemnat in intreaga istorie. Cati au murit la WTC? 3000?

Cunosc argumentele false si inumane ale autoritatilor relativ la acest eveniment. Ca s-a terminat razboiul mai repede… Ca democratia… Ca alegeri libere… Vorbe goale! Aceste valori sunt identice cu cele ale teroristilor neguvernamentali ca ETA sau IRA. Asa cum aceste organizatii vor sa aiba un teritoriu de pe care sa-si extraga impozitele la fel si teroristii oficiali ai SUA vor sa-si largeasca imperiul si sa acumuleze impozite si de pe alte teritorii. De fapt povestea despre implementarea democratiei in Orientul Mijlociu are principala intentie de a scoate arabii din moschei si de a-i muta in cazinouri si corporatii. Pana la urma argumentele lor in favoarea justificarii celui mai mare act terorist din istorie de la Nagasaki si Hiroshima se reduce la o singura propozitie: vointa autoritatilor e sfanta in timp ce vointa omului simplu e neimportanta… Cei 200 000 de inocenti de la Nagasaki si Hiroshima erau anonimi pe cand cei 3000 erau elite financiar-corporatiste (sic!) …

Razboiul impotriva terorismului se dovedeste de fapt mai intai a fi o tautologie deoarece spirala terorismului este alimentata de razboi. Iar apoi un astfel de presupus razboi este o contradictie in termeni deoarece razboiul si terorismul sunt unul si acelasi lucru care se intaresc si se sprijina reciproc si in nici un caz nu se anihileaza reciproc.

Practic terorismul radical practicat de (cei care sunt numiti de autoritati) teroristi provoaca acelasi tip de frustrare omului de rand ca si razboiul promovat de autoritati. Caracterul amator al teroristilor simpli se poate vedea din toate actiunile lor. Ei nu pot crea un Pearl Harbour sau un 9/11 si nici nu pot controla presa asa cum organizatorii razboaielor oficiale o fac. Teroristii sar peste partea asta si trec direct la fapte. Abia cu anii de experienta incep si ei sa o dea la intors, invata strategiile manipularii opiniei publice si alte chestii din astea. De exemplu ETA a ajuns sa fie reprezentata in parlamentul spaniol si la fel si IRA. Este o minima educatie pe care profesionistii terorii le-o ofera amatorilor. Treptat asanumitul razboi impotriva terorismului devine un minunat parteneriat de tip win-win cu terorismul iar treaba asta se face organizat .

Autoritatile au nevoie de teroristi la fel cum armatele au nevoie de alte armate „dusmane” pentru a-si demonstra o utilitate artificiala si sa contracareze astfel menirea lor principala: aceea de a fi un factor de negociere decisiv in negocierea relatiei dintre stapani si sclavi. Fara amenintari exterioare statul propagandistic si cel politienesc nu s-ar mai putea justifica, ar fi desfiintat si atunci foarte greu ar mai fi gasiti sclavi „de buna voie” pentru sustinerea sistemului pentru ca nu ar mai avea cine sa ii forteze sa devina sclavi.

Menirea principala a armatelor, terorismului si mafiei nu este aceea de a ne apara de dusmani, extraterestri sau alte amenintari care chipurile, ar vrea sa ne colonizeze. Asta este doar o strategie specifica de ridicare cat mai eficienta a taxei de protectie de la cei vampirizati si de justificare a unei crime oficiale absolut incredibile. Menirea principala a armatelor este aceea de a ameninta si chiar a scalda in sange revolta sclavilor chiar daca o astfel de situatie se intampla odata la un secol in tarile civilizate si de mai multe ori in celelalte. De exemplu in Romania acest lucru s-a intamplat la rascoala taranilor din 1907 si la revolutia din 1989 impotriva dictaturii comuniste. In primul caz armatele au reusit sa inabuseasca in sange revolta taranilor iar in cel de-al doilea doar au incercat insa au intors vitejeste armele atunci cand opinia publica internationala a dat de inteles ca sprijina schimbarea.

Cel mai cunoscut caz de terorism al armatei impotriva propriilor cetateni in lumea civilizata este Germania anilor 30-40 unde grevele muncitorilor a condus la accesul la putere a unui partid razboinic. Dar pentru ca nu se putea concepe un plan demn de societatea civilizata prin care muncitorii sa fie inecati in sange (dreptul la greva fiind garantat) atunci s-a propus o sublimare prin care muncitorii au fost inlocuiti cu evreii.

Evident ca sistemul incearca din rasputeri sa acopere astfel de evenimente la fel cum constientul face fata de inconstient si despre asta voi analiza in detaliu in urmatorul articol. Sublimarea si formatiunea reactionala sunt concepte psihanalitice care se aplica exact in acest caz. Politicienii se agita din cand in cand sa creeze situatii conflictuale sau inventand razboaie cu alte state sau comunitati pentru a-i da armatei forma de institutie de protectie pentru cetateni. Toata lumea se gandeste la costurile imense de intretinere a armatelor si a mentalitatilor clasice si primitive specifice celor care activeaza in ele si oricine ar avea tendinta sa reduca aceste costuri. Insa perspectiva unui razboi cu un stat vecin le tempereaza orice tendinta de reorganizare a statului. Din pacate asta e si interesul autoritatilor iar cetatenii inghit pe nerumegate astfel de galuste venite din partea lor. Prea putini se mai intreaba si mai departe cum ar fi daca ar armatele ar lipsi de tot si de peste tot.

Ce s-o mai lungim: atata timp cat visul antic al lui Aristotel ca masinile sa inlocuiasca sclavul liber nu s-a realizat inca decat partial sistemul inca are nevoie de sclavi. Iar sclavul nu poate fi convins sa execute ordinele stapanului decat prin teroare. Manipularea care se afla astazi in functie este sustinuta la baza tot de teroare dar despre diferentierea dintre acestea voi scrie in urmatorul articol pe acest blog.

Societatea contemporana civilizata actuala nu poate exista fara razboi deocamdata cam la fel ca si cea clasica insasi din care face eforturi sa se desprinda. Razboiul sperie muncitorul, il face foarte productiv spre a strange provizii pentru momentele de saracie asemenea unei furnici amenintata de iarna. Evident ca un asemenea cadru e perfect pentru bogatii lumii care se imbogatesc si mai tare de pe urma anxietatii provocate de perspectiva razboiului.

Fara amenintarea armata sclavul contemporan ar fi un primitiv lenes si pasiv care duce o viata usoara si simpla. Asta e o prespectiva foarte neproductiva si necreativa. Alaturi de sistemul de educatie si justitie institutia razboiului contribuie la aceasta manipulare profunda si sistematica pentru transformare a primitivului contemporan in sclav contemporan. Daca in trecut ea era folosita la jefuire pur si simplu astazi institutia razboiului e mai mult folosita la tinerea sclavului in frau la contracararea posibilelor lor revolte. Lupta armatelor statului cu terorismul e de fapt o lupta pentru dominatie. Miza e insa aceeasi: niste teritorii de cucerit si niste sclavi de stapanit. IRA si ETA voiau tari proprii pe care sa le stapaneasca ele.

Traim intr-o societate inca razboinica desi cativa au ajuns sa le repugne haina si mentalitatea militara. Suntem indoctrinati cu militarism. Suntem amenintati direct de catre teroristi neprofesionisti sau indirect si voalat de catre armatele teroriste profesioniste ale statului. Orasele sunt impanzite cu nonsalanta de statui reprezentand mari conducatori de osti, capi ai terorismului de stat traditional. Centrul de interes al compozitiei din arta clasica este de fapt sublimarea comandantului de osti intr-un punct. Divinitatea religiilor clasice si figurile lor profetice sunt de asemenea niste centre de interes care supraevalueaza pe cei puternici in defavoarea celor slabi si lipsiti de aparare. Discriminarea si abuzurile nu vor putea fi eradicate atata timp cat va exista cultura clasica si armata. Mentalitatea razboinica a distrugerii sau robirii unei alte comunitatii este parte din spiritul civilizatiei si nici un succes personal sau colectiv nu poate fi conceput in acest moment al culturii fara astfel de consecinte.

In fiecare stat exista un minister al armatei denumit pompos si cosmetizat minister al apararii nationale. Insa daca sinceritatea ar fi un atribut al functionarii statului contemporan un astfel de minister nu ar mai fi numit ministerul apararii nationale ci pur si simplu ministerul terorismului national. Cred ca armatele sunt principala unealta a statelor pentru impartirea lumii in jucatori de golf si pacienti de spital. Nu cred ca mai trebuie cautat prea mult originea tulburarilor psihice descrise pe tratate de sute de mii de pagini. A mai crede din acest moment in teoria stadiilor de evolutie libidinala infantila propusa de Freud si dezvoltata ulterior de alti psihanalisti fara a vedea cancerul social care ne macina mintile inca din frageda pruncie este deja o ipocrizie. In urmatorul articol voi face o analiza mai amanuntita a consecintelor psihopatologice ce decurg dintr-o astfel de stare de fapte.

Examples of spiritual mutilation made by education system

2010-01-31T05:45:00.000-08:00

Aici tradus in limba romana

Institutions say that the school's main role would be to provide information which the student will use later as adult. But school provide useful information only for some which would receive social privileged functions. The most important thing that contemporary education system makes is the selection and assignment of the bad or good jobs of future masters or slaves.

As long as school is done systematically by the (semitotalitarian) state's interest the education will borrow all its defects. The idea of school who takes the untrained and imperfect man and makes him happy, civilized and perfect is a mess comparable to many other contemporary state garbage. The hypocrisy of the system is fully reflected in the educational system.

Two main things the school aims. The first is the early identification of potential leaders in order to attract them to the slave system side and to avoid types like Spartacus and Jesus who destroyed the Roman Empire culture. Thus the system creates bureaucracy that holds such people from starting major revolts. The bureaucratic jobs are easy jobs for potential leaders to make sure that they will not develop subversive activities against the established order. The system creates some selection mechanisms that will identify the truly charismatic and perseverance ones and put them in comfortable and warm positions that will not cause agitation in the minds of slaves.

The second is to discreetly prevent common people from knowing the laws which often can defend against authorities’ abuse. On paper, on the legislation level, everything seems so ethereal, the people have freedom and human rights that protects and society looks open. Applying this hypocrite legislation for everybody interest is impossible and that is not because authorities are incompetent but because the laws themselves are hypocritical and false. The school does everything within its power to prevent ordinary people come close to laws for not using them in very many situations where the true relationship between them and the authorities show an entirely different nature than the one paper embellish. The artificial use of a hipercomplex language, of unnecessary neologisms and phrases as the Hegel's hermetic philosophy is part of the way legislation exists all over the world. But this is just an obstacle that ordinary people can pass. In order to prevent ordinary people from using the law in relation to masters the school get involved in its specific long time way.

This is because even at the abstract and non applicable level the law gives some rights to modern slave and that will eventually affect the master pockets. If a slave comes to know the laws then it may become harder to be enslaved and justice mercenaries would have to extra work in order to make it denser and more inaccessible. And if the slave does not know to ask for its rights and agree to be servant then the mercenary life is one more pleasant.

Hunting the minds of future slaves and distracting it from the knowledge of laws are two specific macro procedures education in civilized world. Both go hand in hand and using either one implies the other. Negative discrimination of slave in the two civilized world social systems (communist and capitalist) means combinations in different doses of these two procedures. The main use of such a certain procedure among the other makes the differentiation between communist totalitarian systems of education from the western semitotalitarian ones. Communist totalitarian education systems require a lot of information to children so that they intellectually collapse and eventually give up their claims. The semitotalitarian Western civilized countries education systems simply create special schools for those who will occupy these warm and easy positions within the bureaucracy. The common children have no access to such schools. Next I will analyze both one after another.

Free Western education system intentionally kept low quantity and quality of information and has chosen to provide future slaves specialized knowledge instead of thick and very diverse one. The good part of western education is that the knowledge child learns from school will be used later in the everyday life. On the contrary, the information that communist education systems provide is useless, except testing the child’s memorize power for a better job. Still the really important knowledge for common people status and emancipation is inaccessible in western education systems too. Philosophical and scientific data that contradict the semi-slavery interests are either hidden or ignored. On the other hand the information necessary to accede to a higher social range are taught in special schools unaffordable the common people. In this case the tool is discriminatory education is made with paid education.

In countries like England and USA there are schools that accept only students fated to become elite. The costs of such schools can not be supported by common people. Free education student has not the slightest chance of winning the competing with such an elitist school one. And this is how discrimination is achieved under the intentions and interests of the system. Stories about equal opportunities disappear under the greed of deeply discriminatory social system. This type of differentiated schools exist in Western society since the early and basically, the idea of "equal opportunities" that corporate propaganda still sustains today is just an illusion.

The western social system quickly relaxed as Asian slaves were brought to sustain world wide economy. Western education has changed its principles, has become more human and suddenly discovered some capacities of psychotherapeutic and counseling. But, again, all this happened only because there were slaves more profitable found elsewhere or there were immigrants admitted on western territories that ask for very few rights in change for supporting the economy. If the economy has not taking well things go bad with education too.

The totalitarian communist political system uses equality propaganda to define education system. It has become popular with the idea of equality and justice but its application in reality was an imposture. Thus under the mask of social justice communism developed one of the wildest social discrimination ever seen. The most important thing that totalitarian communist school systems present is the scientific, indubitable and unquestionable aspect of social and justice system. The slaves were educated to religious love and stand right in the face of such "perfect constructs" of civilization. The stony face and the arrogance of those who occupy different positions in state institutions were hiding a kind of colonialist intransigence.

Most of the information that communist education system provided was pointless, empty words designed to select between students on the memorizing criteria and then to distribute them to bureaucratic or hard working jobs. Kids had to work harder and learn more things comparing to western because the communist education system raised the study level with diversification, multiplicity and extreme detailed data. In this way communist schools said are "superior" to those of capitalism. But under the shadow of that elitism was hidden a more cruel reality that can be found in a lesser degree in "civilized countries" schools too: every school fill the minds of school children with useless information. Unnecessary garbage served by mandatory "free education" to children is meant to deplete their personal resources and give up the intention of studying some more of highly complex state legislation that could be used later in everyday life. In this way the school empowers the monopoly of justice for those who uses it for their own use only. Society does not need too many philosophers and scholars but simply mechanics as Romanian President Traian Băsescu once said with greedy nonchalance (or common sense - which is actually, paradoxically – the same thing). So the school complies with these trends and thanks to the caste discrimination it ended by getting children tired and sick of learning and manipulated them to love handcrafting. Here the main role of school!

In fact Romanian school was not so much interested of showing superior to those of the Western but it was deeply and meanly interested to stop as acceded to many in the privileged position in state. The communist system promised that everyone will be remunerated based on one’s worth unlike capitalism injustice. Thus communism has gained many supporters from the socially excluded who expected a better life. But with lifting the level of learning from early age the communism only changed the criterion of discrimination and not changed the discrimination itself. The communist education system putted a lot of pressure on young by learning in high school what is teaching in the western college or studying in primary school what is teaching in western high school. Most of students obviously failed to pass the communist education high-difficulty tests and cope up to enter the factory instead of office. But at the end most of young people reached to hate communism and to unconditionally embrace capitalist values and thus anticommunist movements grew.

In addition to raising level of knowledge taught in school the communist education system has allowed system of discrimination developed a strange home teaching paid education. The more detailed school books that could not be covered in class only the more private paid home developed. Without parallel private lessons one could not expect to be admitted to a school of the future. Many parents, credulous to system’s lies, continued pressures on children to “exceptional results in teaching”. Basically the system and continuous diversification of the privet paid lessons were as in an arms race. As more children gave their best endeavors to adapt school the system responded with higher barriers. From here to the institutionalized corruption was no longer than a single step.

In the mid-1990s in Romania low university became very popular among young. Magistrates were envied for their salaries since devitalizing industry. Most high school graduates wanted admission to faculties of law and a bright future in the legal system. To stop access to that information and to the good social positions the admission examinations to such schools were extremely hard. Kids were learning history and grammar as if law schools would not produce lawyers but some kind of doctors in language and history. Competition was so great that to be admitted to such colleges ought to be some sort of specialist in grammar and history. If wouldn’t pay private lessons with who knows what celebrity in the field who would give a sort of theoretical password among her/his caste colleagues then it would be impossible to manage to pass the entrance examination.

We can imagine how dirty the system with these naive people was. Hundreds of private colleges have emerged and tens of thousands of graduates that the Romanian state could not hire them. After years and years in a row of anaesthetizing mind spent learning grammar and history, after having invested huge money in "private lessons" with influential teachers to pass the entrance examination system has invented other barriers to prevent everyone get a job and be paid by the state with good money. So there came out unemployment among law graduates. Getting into meant more "private lessons" and more money spent over and over again. Some parents have sold houses to help their sons and daughters but their teachers on the faculties became local political leaders, business owners and other influence local chefs who placed their people in various positions in the state apparatus. High level corruption was possible with mafia infiltrated into state institutions. While such a minority prospered, most law graduates found themselves unemployed as well as poor. It was the emergence of new disciplines at primary school that washed up a little bit this official megafraud. "Civic education" was not designed to teach legislation for 14 years kids but to give some jobs to these "luxury unemployment".

The way innocent minds are mutilated since early age shows up to a gruesome lust of greed. There is no compassion for future slaves even when they are fragile and innocent beings. The need for wild education is a long term business. "Education is an investment in the future" say the politicians who rub their hands waiting for the human harvest that will enhance their insatiable need for luxury. As hungry and obese in the same time they control the process of transforming human into slave.

As a former teacher I was simply dumbfounded by some pedagogy texts that are actually some kind of neoscholasticism. The difference with medieval scholasticism and these statements is that instead of Aristotle's logic used to get famous and ridiculous statements, the contemporary pedagogy is now using mathematics. But just like the medieval scholastic the official contemporary pedagogy came to some absolutely ridiculous, unnecessary and abstract statements with no interest whatsoever for the child. Anyway as regarding human rights and legislation in general, the contemporary state are in the same position which was the church in the Middle Ages: both work on illusions, lies and frauds. Church applies these in the metaphysical level and contemporary state applies them to legal, procedural level.

Tons and tons of pedagogical scrap written in cyborgish language and with inhuman approach are annually published to spread the false impression that education is made by some professionals who give their best for humanity to progress. Lacking empathy, lacking human warmth and mainly concerned the means of access to higher social positions in the bureaucracy of the education system these pedagogy have a precise goal: to cause confusion and to dial student into slave. It does not matter so much lifting an elitist minority teaching as soon as a majority demoralization that the system spiritually mutilate in order to become a tool to use for the welfare and convenience of this minority.

Exemple de mutilare spirituala făcuta de sistem cu ajutorul educatiei

2010-01-31T05:37:00.000-08:00

English version here:

Oficial se spune ca principalul rol al scolii ar fi acela de a oferi informatii pe care elevul le va folosi spre binele lui cand va fi adult. Insa scoala nu ofera informatii utile decat unora care ulterior vor primi functii privilegiate. Cel mai important lucru pe care sistemul de invatamant al statului contemporan il face este selectia si repartizarea pe functii a viitorilor stapani sau sclavi.

Atata timp cat scoala se face sistematic dupa interesul statului (semitotalitar) ea imprumuta toate defectele acestuia. Ideea despre scoala care ia omul neinstruit si imperfect si il face fericit, civilizat si perfect este o mizerie comparabila cu multele alte asemenea mizerii ale statului contemporan. Ipocrizia sistemului se regaseste pe deplin in sistemul de invatamant.

Doua lucruri principale urmareste scoala. Primul este cel al identificarii timpurii ai potentialilor lideri si atragerea lor de partea sistemului sclavagist pentru a evita fenomene de tip Spartacus si Isus care au daramat cultural Imperiul Roman. Astfel ca sistemul creeaza birocratia in care acest gen de oameni sa fie plasati si astfel sa ii impiedice de a porni revolte. Birocratia presupune joburi de taiat frunze la caini pentru a fi sigur ca potentialii lideri nu vor desfasura activitati subversive la adresa ordinii stabilite. Sistemul creeaza anumite mecanisme de selectie pentru identificarea celor cu adevarat carismatici si perseverenti in a-si obtine interesul pentru a-i plasa in aceste functii comode si caldute si a nu produce agitatie in mintea sclavului.

Cel de-al doilea este impiedicarea discreta a omului de rand in a cunoaste legislatia cu care de multe ori se poate apara impotriva abuzurilor autoritatilor. Pe hartie, la nivel de legislatie totul pare asa diafan, omul are libertate, omul are drepturi si societatea este una dreapta. Aplicarea acestor prevederi ipocrite ale legislatiei insa este una imposibila pentru toti si asta nu pentru ca „oamenii legii” sunt nepriceputi ci pentru ca legile insele sunt ipocrite si false. Scoala va face tot ce ii sta in putere pentru a impiedica omul de rand sa ajunga la aceste prevederi legislative pentru a nu apela la ele in extrem de multele situatii in care adevarata relatie dintre el si autoritati arata o cu totul alta natura decat cea cosmetizata de pe hartie. Complicarea artificiala a limbajului, folosirea unor neologisme inutile si a frazelor cat mai intortocheate dupa modelul filosofiei ermetiste a lui Hegel este parte din forma in care se prezinta legislatia peste tot in lume. Dar acesta este doar un obstacol pe care omul de rand il poate trece. Pentru ca omul de rand sa nu ajunga in a folosi legislatia in relatia cu stapanii scoala intervine in modul ei specific.

Asta pentru ca legislatia chiar si la nivel abstract si neaplicabil la care se afla ii ofera sclavului oaresce drepturi care se simt ulterior in buzunarele stapanului. Daca sclavul ajunge sa cunoasca legislatia atunci el poate deveni mai greu de inrobit iar mercenarii justitiari trebuie sa munceasca in plus pentru a o face si mai stufoasa si mai inaccesibila. Iar daca sclavul nu stie sa isi ceara drepturile si accepta sa fie servitor atunci viata sa este una mai placuta.

Obosirea mintilor viitorilor sclavi si abaterea atentiei de la cunoasterea legislatiei sunt doua proceduri macrosociale specifice invatamantului lumii civilizate. Ambele merg mana in mana si folosirea uneia o implica si pe cealalta. Discriminarea negativa la care e supus sclavul in cele doua sisteme sociale din lume presupune combinatii ale acestora in diferite doze. Gradul de folosire uneia dintre aceste proceduri in defavoarea celuilalt ofera diferentierea sistemului totalitarist comunist de invatamant fata de cel semitotalitarist occidental. Sistemul totalitarist comunist incarca materia predata copiilor astfel incat ei sa colapseze intelectual si astfel ii face sa renunte in a mai invata pentru joburi mai bune. Sistemul semitotalitarist din tarile civilizate occidentale pur si simplu creeaza scoli speciale pentru cei ce vor ocupa aceste functii caldute. In continuare le voi analiza pe rand pe ambele.

Sistemul gratuit de invatamant occidental a pastrat intentionat la un nivel scazut stacheta cantitatii si calitatilor informatiilor preferand ca in locul unor cunostinte stufoase si foarte diverse sa ofere viitorilor sclavi cunostinte specializate. Partea buna e ca ceea ce copilul va fi invatat in scoala va aplica concret in viata de zi cu zi. Dimpotriva informatiile care scoala comunista le ofera sunt facute mai mult pe post de test de anduranta si clasificare decat pe post de a fi aplicate candva. Dar cunostintele cu adevarat importante pentru statutul omului de rand, pentru emanciparea lui sunt inaccesibile. Datele filosofice si stiintifice care contrazic interesele semisclavagiste sunt fie camuflate fie ignorate. Pe de alta parte informatiile necesare pentru accederea la un loc social caldut se predau in scoli speciale care costa atat cat omul de rand sa nu invete in ele. In acest caz instrumentul educatiei discriminatorii se face cu educatia platita.

In tari ca Anglia sau SUA exista scoli elevate la care sunt admisi doar cei predestinati sa devina elite. Costurile unei asemenea scoli nu pot fi sustinute de veniturile omului de rand. Pus intr-o confruntare directa elevul absolvent de invatamant gratuit nu are nici cea mai mica sansa de a-l intrece pe cel pregatit de o astfel de scoala elitista. Si iata cum discriminarea se realizeaza dupa intentiile si interesele sistemului. Povestile despre egalitatea de sanse dispar sub lacomia sistemului social profund discriminatoriu. Tipul acesta de scoli diferentiate a existat in societatea occidentala inca de timpuriu si, practic, ideea de „egalitate de sanse” pe care propaganda corporatista inca mai bate moneda si astazi este din start compromisa.

Sistemul social occidental s-a relaxat rapid odata cu cooptarea sclavilor asiatici in special in angrenajul economiei mondiale. Educatia occidentala si-a schimbat principiile, a devenit mai umana, si-a descoperit subit valentele psihoterapeutice si de consiliere. Dar, repet, toate astea doar pentru ca s-au gasit sclavi mult mai profitabili altundeva sau au fost acceptati pe teritoriile in cauza emigranti care cer foarte putine drepturi pentru a sustine economia. Acolo unde economia nu a dus-o asa de bine lucrurile au mers rau si cu educatia.

Sistemul totalitarist comunist foloseste propaganda egalitatii pentru a-i defini sistemul de invatamant. El s-a impus pe plan politic cu ideea egalitatii si dreptatii, numai ca aplicarea ei in realitate s-a dovedit o impostura. Astfel ca sub aceasta masca a dreptatii sociale se manifesta una dintre cele mai salbatice discriminari sociale. Cel mai important lucru pe care il ofera scoala sistemelor totalitarist-comuniste este aspectul stiintific, sigur, indubitabil al sistemului social si al justitiei. Sclavul este educat sa iubeasca religios si sa stea drepti in fata unor astfel de „constructii perfecte” ale civilizatiei. Fata de piatra si aroganta celor care ocupa diferitele functii in institutiile statului au in ele intransigenta colonialista.

Cele mai multe din informatii sunt vorbe in vant, tocilarie goala menita sa faca o selectie pe criteriul memoriei intre elevi pe care apoi sa ii distribuie in posturi. Ingreunarea materiei, prin ridicarea nivelului de studiu care a implicat diversificarea, multiplicarea si amanuntirea extrema a datelor oferite spre studiu a fost o caracteristica a scolilor comuniste care isi reclamau astfel „superioritatea” fata de capitalism. Sub umbra acestui elitism se ascundea insa o realitate mult mai cruda care poate fi gasita intr-un grad mai mic si la scolile „tarilor civilizate”: scoala umple mintile copiilor cu informatii nefolositoare. Maculatura inutila servita de „invatamantul gratuit” dar obligatoriu copiilor este menita sa le epuizeze resursele personale in asa fel incat sa cedeze intentiei de a mai studia stufoasa legislatie a statului si de a se putea apara in viata de zi cu zi. In felul acesta se intareste monopolul celor care o folosesc doar pentru uzul propriu. Societatea nu are nevoie de prea multi filosofi si invatati ci pur si simplu de tinichigii auto spunea cu nonsalanta ce frizeaza nesimtirea (sau bunul simt – care e de fapt, paradoxal, acelasi lucru) presedintele Traian Basescu. Asadar scoala se conformeaza acestor tendinte si prin discriminarea de casta va face in asa fel incat copiii sa urasca complicata si stufoasa invatatura la scoala si sa iubeasca mesteritul. Iata principalul rol al scolii!

Dar de fapt asta nu inseamna neaparat o superioritate a scolii romanesti fata de cele occidentale cat faptul de a stopa accederea celor multi in pozitii privilegiate in stat. Sistemul comunist a promis ca fiecare va fi retribuit dupa merit spre deosebire de capitalism pe care il acuza de nedreptate. In felul acesta el a castigat destui adepti din zona marginalilor social care s-au asteptat la o viata mai buna. Insa odata ce ridicat stacheta si a ridicat nivelul de complexitate a studiului practic el doar a schimbat criteriul de discriminare nu si discriminarea in sine. Invatand in liceu ceea ce in Occident se studiaza in facultate sau invatand in clasele primare ceea ce in Occident se studiaza in liceu pe elevul sistemului comunist s-a pus mai multe presiuni. Cei mai multi fireste, au clacat si s-au resemnat inca de la acea varsta ca vor intra in fabrica si nu la birou. Dar in final s-a ajuns ca majoritatea tinerilor sa urasca comunismul si sa imbratiseze neconditionat valorile capitaliste si astfel miscarile anticomuniste sa ia amploare.

Pe langa birocratia ridicarii nivelului de cunostinte predate in scoala sistemul comunist de discriminare a permis si departajarea educatiei platite. Sistemul de meditatii particulare platite a luat amploare iar materia stufoasa nu putea fi acoperita doar de orele de curs. Fara lectiile particulare paralele nimeni nu putea spera sa fie admis la o scoala de viitor. Creduli fata de gogosile sistemului multi parinti au continuat presiunile asupra copiilor pentru ”rezultate exceptionale la invatatura”. Practic sistemul meditatiilor si diversificarea continua a materiei se aflau intr-o cursa a inarmarilor. Pe masura ce copiii isi dadeau mai mult silinta spre a se adapta cunostintelor sistemul le raspundea cu obstacole si mai mari. De aici pana la coruptia institutionalizata nu mai e decat un singur pas.

Pe la jumatatea anilor 1990 in Romania aparuse febra absolventilor de facultati de drept. Odata cu devitalizarea industriei si punerea ei pe butuci juristii ajunsesera invidiati pentru salariile lor. Majoritatea absolventilor de liceu isi doreau admiterea la facultatile de drept si un viitor luminos in sistemul juridic. Pentru a stopa accesul prea multora la aceste informatii si, evident la salariile motivate ale juristilor admiterea se facea cu examene extrem de dure la istorie si gramatica de parca nu juristi ar fi iesit de acolo ci niste doctori in lingvistica si istorie. Concurenta era atat de mare incat pentru a reusi sa fi admis la astfel de facultati ar fi trebuit sa fi un fel de specialist si in gramatica si in istorie. Daca nu ai fi facut meditatii cu cine stie ce somitati in domeniu care sa iti dea un fel de parole teoretice cu care alti colegi de casta sa te promoveze ar fi fost imposibil sa reusesti sa treci examenul de admitere.

Ne putem imagina cat de pervers a fost sistemul cu acesti creduli. Au aparut sutele de facultati particulare si zecile de mii de absolventi pe care statul roman nu putea sa ii angajeze. Dupa ce ani si ani la rand i-au petrecut invatand gramatica si istorie pana si-au anesteziat mintea, dupa ce au investit sume colosale in „meditatii” cu profesori influenti pentru a trece examenul de admitere sistemul a mai inventat o piedica pentru a nu le permite miilor de absolventi sa profeseze. In acest caz a aparut fenomenul somajului intre juristi. Ca sa ajungi sa fi cooptat in sistem trebuia sa o iei de la capat cu „meditatiile” si ploconeala. Unii parinti si-au vandut casele ca sa isi realizeze copiii iar unii profesori pe la facultatile de drept au ajuns lideri politici locali, patroni de diferite afaceri si baroni locali cu oameni „pregatiti” de ei si pusi in diferite functii in aparatul statului. Coruptia la nivel inalt s-a facut cu astfel de mafioti plasati strategic in posturi cheie din stat. In timp ce o astfel de minoritate prospera cei mai multi absolventi s-au trezit la fel de someri dar si mai saraci. Numai aparitia unei noi discipline la clasele primare, „educatia civica” menita nu atat sa invete niste copii de pana in 14 ani legislatia cat sa le dea de lucru acestor „someri de lux” a putut sa mai estompeze un pic din megaescrocheria oficiala realizata atunci.

Modul in care mintile inocente sunt mutilate inca din cea mai frageda varsta frizeaza o voluptate infioratoare a lacomiei. Nu exista nici un fel de mila fata de viitori sclavi nici macar atunci cand sunt niste fiinte plapande si inocente. Mania educatiei e o afacere pe termen lung. „Educatia e o investitie in viitor” spun politicienii care isi freaca mainile asteptand recolta umana care le va spori nevoia lor nesatioasa de lux. Ca niste burghezi flamanzi si obezi in acelasi timp ei controleaza acest proces de transformare a omului in sclav.

Ca fost profesor am ramas pur si simplu uluit de anumite texte de pedagogie care sunt efectiv niste neoscolasticisme. Diferenta fata de scolastica medievala este ca in loc de logica lui Aristotel folosita pentru a obtine celebrele si ridicolele enunturi, pedagogia contemporana foloseste mai nou matematica. Insa la fel ca si scolastica medievala si pedagogia contemporana oficiala a ajuns la niste enunturi absolut penibile, abstracte si inutile sub raportul interesului copilului. In fond, in ceea ce priveste enunturile drepturilor omului si a legislatiei in general, statul contemporan se afla in aceeasi pozitie in care se afla si biserica in Evul Mediu: ambele functioneaza pe iluzii, pe minciuni si escrocherii. Prima le aplica la nivel metafizic, al doilea le aplica la nivel juridic, procedural.

Tone si tone de maculatura pedagogica scrisa cu limbaj de lemn si cu abordare inumana se publica anual doar pentru a da impresia ca educatia este facuta de niste profesionisti care isi dau toata silinta pentru ca umanitatea sa progreseze. Lipsiti de empatie, lipsiti de caldura umana si preocupati in principal de mijloacele de accedere la functiile inalte ale birocratiei sistemului de invatamant astfel de pedagogi au un tel precis: sa produca confuzie si sa-l formeze ca sclav pe elev. Nu conteaza atat de mult ridicarea unei minoritati elitiste prin invataturile sale cat mai curand demoralizarea unei majoritati pe care sistemul o mutileaza in scopul de a deveni instrument de folosire pentru bunastarea si comoditatea acestei minoritati.

Education: another basic tool (among legislation) of social discrimination

2009-12-19T12:12:00.000-08:00

in romaneste aici

Following the tendencies of ancient slaves that weaken the roman empire from the inside the late classical slaves of 17,18,19 and even 20 centuries raised up violently and won some battles against the masters. Since then the older theory of “divine right” who said that the slaves and the masters are made by god were not only rejected but really eradicated from the knowledge of common people. The fact of aristocratic stealing from the poor and weaken with the violence threaten that was made in the classical edge was more and more perceived as a bad thing. The fear of a new violent revolt of slaves this theory was hided under the well-known classical slavery abolition. But that does not mean that the slavery in its essence really disappeared but it has only changed a little bit, just like the ancient temples transformed into Christian churches.

The difference between overcalled civilized society and the classical one is the power of contemporary slave to simply quit a job when the productivity pressings becomes unbearable and the so-called jobs made for old aristocrats successors that play working and being productive. But the actual jobs that really create something for community are the hard ones of slaves. These jobs are absolute necessary for the system, are indispensable. Those made for cover up and to save the old aristocracy are dispensable, secondary because the community can survive (happily) without them. They are jobs only by the name but not by the facts. They are special, well paid and very commode as the aristocratic way of life is. This macrosocial strategy consolidates the illusion of equality of chances for everyone and the legislative state that the system creates for preventing raisings up. But beyond these empty words remains the fact that the old aristocracy survives through these so-called jobs that are very well paid and very easy to do. I will describe with more details in one of my next entries these kinds of jobs. For keeping these jobs for some people only there is legislation used with its natural discriminatory application. For early selection of those who (still) have to do some works and for long time convincing them to do it there are used state education.

The system usually says that studding and making efforts of becoming better and better in school would bring good things in adulthood and will live happily ever after. Just like a lottery some of the best will occupy important and well paid functions inside the system but most of them will be prepared for the 8 hours of work in the factory. On the other hand, for those who have remarkable intellectual abilities the system creates the bureaucracy, meaning a part of those dispensable jobs more or less unusable.

But for the most of kids are deceived in order to accept their servants place in the society. Just like the classical slave would not be slave without some death threaten in the some manner the modern slave would not be slave if school would not do something about. The school could not correctly and equally evaluate the kids’ performances even if it wants to because it has to underestimate those of old classical slaves’ successors in order to convince about their disability and their faults. Just like the judges case everyone of professors is more or less subtle threaten with loosing the job in the situation when slaves refuse to work. The social crisis is the system incapacity of collecting the slaves work. The professor has this unconscious impulse of student discrimination beyond the empty words, curriculums, directives and hypocrite statements of modern pedagogy. Even at a certain moment the teacher believes in its children love work something inside of still hold it back and professionally force it to behave despotic towards some of them. There is a macabre joke that says that the difference between a professor and a pedophile is that the pedophile loves the child for real…

That is the way school increases the disadvantages of reduced intellectual possibilities that some people has been born with in order to use the contemporary slave as a simple tool, as an object meant to serve the privileged ones greed. Everywhere in the world the institution that deals with children formation is called “The Ministry of Education” but it should simply and truthfully be called “The Ministry of Early Discrimination”. There are some countries, especially the former communist ones that still have the reflexes of former totalitarian system that teaches inutile and old information. If the main purpose of school would be that of learning then such a system must be fool. But these systems are not fools at all, they know very well what are doing: they pay actually for the humble heads and for the docility of future slaves that teacher ask for in the first moment as enter the class room. Beyond the information that everyone can find on the internet or in the libraries the main purpose of school is not learning but the negative discrimination, convincing the slaves to accept their fate from the very young.

The legislation is basically made for the already shaped adult slave and manipulates him/her to keep on being slave. On the other hand it is the state education that subtle and systematic mutilate the children minds to prepare them to become future slaves. This requires a strategy very carefully built and very well sustained on the long term. The job conditions negotiation between employee and employer starts long time before they actually meet and school helps the one that feeds it. In the old classical society if a young person would make a “mistake” in relation with a senior then the whole family including her/his parents would support punishment for the guilt of not providing “proper education”. So this is the way masters used common education from the very beginning of state as a negotiation factor with slaves. It has been long before modern society and it is a naivety to believe that it is gone today. The wild education of classical state is an active part of contemporary education in a very subtle way of course but with the same principles.

Nowadays the western slaves are trapped into genealogical depression and only the entertainment can rise up their spirit. That makes them difficult to deal for employers. The experience of French revolution that decapitated the aristocracy, the experience of communism that decapitated the bourgeoisie, the experience of isolated attenuates against the social privileged ones or the furious strikes of 60-s putted the masters in difficult positions. The temporary solution was dismissing and giving them a consistent social help as unemployed. The solution was found in replacing these native workers with emigrants or in progressively moving the factories to Eastern Europe or extreme Orient. The totalitarian regimes from these areas still provide wild education to their children and authentic slaves for maintaining or even developing world economy. The oriental slaves are fresh blood, they are pure and they did not passed through the dramatic experiences of building up western civilization like the western one did. What we have left is to hope that technology will catch them up and replace them before they will reinvent the French revolution.

In the next entry I will comparatively describe the east-European and extreme-oriental education systems with some examples.

Educatia: un alt instrument fundamental al discriminarii sociale alaturi de legislatie

2009-12-19T11:46:00.000-08:00

english version here

Urmand exemplul revoltei sclavilor antici care a subrezit din interior imperiul roman sclavii mai recenti chiar au reusit victorii decisive si foarte violente asupra stapanilor. De vreo cateva sute de ani in civilizatia occidentala mai vechea teorie a dreptului divin dupa care unii sunt meniti sa fie stapani si altii sa fie sclavi nu numai ca nu mai este acceptata dar a ajuns chiar sa nu mai fie rostita fiind pur si simplu aproape eradicata. In societatea contemporana faptul ca unii iau de la altii doar cu ajutorul amenintarii armelor nu mai pare un lucru corect asa cum parea in secolele trecute. De frica unei noi revolte violente o astfel de teorie a fost pur si simplu ascunsa sub celebra deja abolire a sclaviei. Asta nu inseamna evident ca sclavia a disparut in esenta ei asa cum voi arata intr-unul dintre articolele urmatoare ci doar ca s-a transformat putin, cam la fel cum templele antice s-au transformat in biserici crestine.

Diferenta dintre societatea clasica si cea „civilizata” contemporana este aceea ca sclavul isi poate da demisia din jobul sau atunci cand presiunile de productivitate devin insuportabile si ca vechii aristocrati se prefac ca mai fac si ei cate ceva in societate pentru a nu da impresia ca unii isi distrug sanatatea muncind iar altii huzuresc. Insa locuri de munca propriuzise sunt doar cele ale sclavilor pentru ca doar ele produc efectiv ceva si prin ele se munceste. Acestea sunt joburi indispensabile. Cele facute pentru a camufla clasa vechii aristocratii sunt dispensabile, secundare, sistemul poate functiona (chiar fericit) ca intreg si fara ele. Ele sunt „locuri de munca” doar cu numele. Ele sunt speciale, bine platite si putin stresante specifice stilului de viata al vechii aristocratii. Existenta acestor presupuse „locuri de munca” este facuta doar pentru a da cumva impresia ca societatea e dreapta si ca il rasplateste pe fiecare dupa propria valoare. Intr-unul dintre articolele viitoare am sa descriu in detaliu aceste „joburi. Pentru ca aceste joburi sa ramana doar ale unora se foloseste legislatia cu functia ei discriminatorie asa cum am aratat aici. Pentru selectarea inca de timpuriu a celor care (inca) trebuie sa presteze aceste joburi se foloseste educatia de stat.

Sistemul spune ca cel care invata si este ascultator in scoala va avea numai de castigat in viitor, efectiv il va prinde pe D-zeu de picior. Asemenea unei loterii cativa dintre cei mai buni vor ocupa functii importante si bine platite in sistem insa cei mai multi vor fi pregatiti pentru cele 8 ore pe care le vor petrece docili in fabrica mai tarziu. Dimpotriva, pentru acestia care sunt inzestrati cu capacitati intelectuale si reusesc sa treaca peste barierele puse, sistemul creeaza birocratia, adica o parte din acele joburi dispensabile mai mult sau mai putin inutile.

Cei multi insa sunt doar indusi in eroare pentru a-si accepta rolul de servitori in societate. Dupa cum sclavul clasic nu ar fi fost sclav daca cineva nu ar fi venit cu armele sa il ameninte in aceeasi masura nici sclavul contemporan nu ar deveni sclav daca scoala nu si-ar face treaba in acest sens. Prin urmare scoala nu poate nici daca ar vrea sa faca o evaluare corecta a calitatilor fiecaruia pentru ca ea trebuie sa le subevalueze pe cele urmasilor vechilor sclavi pentru a-i convinge in continuare sa ramana sclavi. La fel ca si in cazul judecatorilor fiecare dintre profesori este amenintat mai mult sau mai putin subtil cu pierderea locului de munca in situatia in care sclavii nu ar mai munci. Criza sociala inseamna incapacitatea de colectare a muncii sclavului. Profesorul are in mod inconstient acest impuls al discriminarii elevilor indiferent de vorbele goale, programele, directivele si afirmatiile ipocrite ale pedagogiei moderne. Chiar daca la un moment dat crede in munca lui de iubire de copii ceva totusi il trage inapoi si il obliga profesional sa se comporte despotic fata de unii dintre ei. O gluma macabra spune ca diferenta dintre profesor si pedofil e aceea ca pedofilul iubeste cu adevarat copiii…

Iata ca dezavantajele native ale unui intelect redus sunt accentuate si mai mult de sistem care face din sclavul contemporan un simplu instrument, un obiect menit pentru a sluji huzurul privilegiatilor. Peste tot in lume institutia care ocupa cu educatia se numeste Minister al Educatiei insa fata de actiunea sa concreta ministerul in cauza ar trebui pur si simplu numi Ministerul Discriminarii Timpurii. Sunt unele tari, in special cele foste comuniste care mostenesc insa reflexele fostului sistem totalitar unde informatiile predate la scoala sunt total perimate si inutile. Daca principalul rol al scolii ar fi acela de invatare atunci inseamna ca sistemul ar trebui sa fie nebun sa investeasca in astfel de informatii. Dar el nu e deloc nebun chiar stie foarte bine ce face: el plateste de fapt capul plecat si docilitatea viitorilor sclavi pe care profesorul o reclama prima data cand intra in clasa. Dincolo de informatiile pe care oricine si le poate lua si de pe internet si de la biblioteca principalul rol al scolii este acela al discriminarii negative, a convingerii sclavului sa isi accepte sclavia inca din frageda varsta.

Iata cum spre deosebire de legislatie care se adreseaza sclavului adult deja format si il manipuleaza sa ramana sclav educatia se adreseaza copiilor mutilandu-i psihic subtil si sistematic spre a fi formati ca viitori sclavi. Ea presupune o strategie atent construita si bine sustinuta pe termen lung. Negocierea salariului si conditiile muncii pe care muncitorul o face cu angajatorul va fi inceput mult mai devreme, inca de pe bancile scolii. In societatea clasica daca un tanar „gresea” ceva fata de un senior atunci erau pedepsiti si parintii acestuia pentru vina de a nu-i fi dat o „educatie corespunzatoare”. Iata cum educatia ca factor de negociere a stapanilor cu sclavii s-a format cu mult inainte de societatea civilizata si e o naivitatea sa crezi ca nu ar mai fi in vigoare si astazi. Educatia salbatica a statului clasic se regaseste in educatia contemporana, intr-o forma mai cosmetizata desigur insa cu aceleasi principii.

Astazi sclavii occidentali sunt cuprinsi de o depresie genealogica incipienta ce este neutralizata de divertisment pentru ridicarea moralului. De aceea ei nu mai accepta asa usor presiunile angajatorilor ca in trecut. Experienta revolutiei franceze care a decapitat aristocratia, a comunismului care a decapitat burghezia, a atentatelor izolate asupra privilegiatilor si a grevelor furibunde din anii 1960 a pus stapanii in situatii delicate. S-a gasit o solutie provizorie in concedierea acestora si acordarea de ajutor de somaj consistent. In locul acestor muncitori nativi nemultumiti fie s-au adus emigranti fie fabricile s-au mutat progresiv spre Europa de est si extremul orient. Regimurile totalitare din aceasta zona a lumii inca ofera educatie salbatica si sclavi autentici pentru mentinerea si chiar cresterea economiei mondiale. Sclavii orientali sunt sange proaspat, sunt aproape puri, n-au trecut prin experientele dramatice ale construirii civilizatiei occidentale. Sa speram ca tehnologia va evolua suficient de rapid incat sa ii inlocuiasca si pe acestia inainte de a ajunge la o revolutie franceza in varianta orientala.

In urmatorul articol voi descrie comparativ sistemele de educatie specifice societatilor europene si extrem orientale cu cateva exemple.

The evolution of concepts of destiny and chaos in the shade of slave social statute

2009-12-01T08:49:00.000-08:00

In romaneste aici:

The ancient polytheism believed that gods, citizens (free people), slaves or animals belong to absolute separate ontological layers. The concept of destiny was the center of ancient religions and philosophies social functions. The society was generally accepted as a discriminatory one. Running from destiny would be impossible even for gods. It was Sisif who tried something like this but he finally ended with a vulture that was systematically eaten his liver. Such a metaphor has the power to show what could happen to the slave if refuses the destiny of being slave. But since 2000 years ago something changed and slaves begun to kill theirselves starting with cultural figures like Jesus or Spartakus. This kind of behavior was not good for others business*. If the selfmurderers would be just 2 than everything would be fine, everything would stay in the limits of favorable statistics. But these two spread out unprofitable ideas among the slaves and soldiers also.

From this point on the ancient religions theory of destiny was replaced with the one of free will of Christianity. The Christian philosophers strongly argued against the destine theory but that does not mean that humanity escaped from the destiny. The main difference was that starting with the Christianity it was a sin to have slaves as the ancient mentality accepted it with no doubts. But the problem remained because the slaves work was still needed to build up the civilization. Anyway, though Christianity couldn’t totally give up the theory of destiny still it was a better offer for the ancient slave because of the chance given to the hazard, to the free will. It wasn’t much gain but it was more than nothing. If the ancient slave has got used (or not) with the idea that he will be no more than a slave till the end of time, on the contrary, the Christian slave has got used with the hope of liberation and salvation. At least the Christian slave was not killed anymore if refused to work and just let alone to pray in the church or monastery and in this way simply used to spread out “the teachings” like “give the Cesar what belongs to Cesar”.

Obviously, the liberation promise was not so clearly spoken; it was more a deception because deep into their mind the master knew that it was a lie. Here is the origin of the demagogical promises that politicians make today, first used by ancient Jews and then continued by the roman soldiers. When it comes to profit than the laws and the morality can be easily modified so they get closer to immorality and illegality. The slavery might be considered a sin by the new religion but with money the sins could be diminished in the eyes of the others. That is why in the civilized world the classical slavery should wait until the 19 century to be eradicated and punish by law. Almost 2 millenniums had passed since the Christianity made its promise of equality between people. This revolution didn’t happen because after 2 millenniums the Christianity remembered that made a promise to the humanity but because the industrial age came out and the machines could work more and more precise. The new technological frame could finally afford the expression and the practicing of human moral feelings. The “free” hungry for work and for more workers replaced the old chained slaves. Nevertheless the juridical liberation of slave was far from its psychological liberation. The “slave morale” continued to exist in the way they survived during the centuries: by obedience. It is sat to notice, but the most important change that civilization made as concerns the slave is that the masters understood that more profit is possible with more liberty to the slave, giving up death threatening and giving the illusion of equality of chances and nondiscrimination.

With Christianity the western culture regarding slave started an absurd, exhausting and deceiving way that can be easily reduce to : „Credo quia absurdum est”. (“I believe because it is absurd”) . Fortunately the humanism had enough power and the dignity to confront those lies used by authorities during centuries. The official ideology begun to fracture and fall down starting from the Hume’s doubts, crossing through the Kant crisis and reaching radical conclusions of Nietzsche finally demonstrated by Freud. The official ideology of state continued to fix over and over such lies and kept going on its isolated, deceiving and inhuman way. The deceiving theories of right, the bureaucracy prescriptions and political statements are still the fundament of contemporary state. I already analyzed some of these on this blog, there are other still to be analyzed.

The liberty of slaves increases during the history evolution the nondestine theories increased and became more powerful. The nowadays theoreticians, including the nowadays theoreticians of religions gives a small part in world for destine. The atheism rejected the theory of destine for good. But the theory of destine is saved paradoxically by the Christianity original ambivalence. The privileged social statute philosophy teachers from universities exchanged destine for chaos and free will theories. Those who still believe in the destine are the contemporary slaves that religion teaches as used to do for centuries.

* I know that religious people would reply that Jesus did not actually kill himself and they might be right from a religious point of view. But I also know that from a practical and political point of view the refusal of military master authority is equal with suicidal action. The choice of being killed by beasts inside of arenas instead of refusal the denying one’s belief still is also a suicidal act. Because if someone gets in the lion cage knowing that there is a lion and after that is killed by it than this is not an accident anymore, but a premeditate act of suicide. The system adapted to such theories and the suicide started to be perceived as one of the greatest sins, but this is another story that I would analyze in the next entries.

Evolutia conceptelor „destin” si „intamplare” in functie de evolutia statutului social al sclavului

2009-11-30T13:03:00.000-08:00

english version here:

Politeismul greco-roman pe care crestinismul l-a inlocuit in lumea credea fara echivoc ca zeii, oamenii liberi, sclavii si animalele s-ar afla pe registre ontologice absolut diferite, ermetice. Religiile si filosofiile antice au avut in conceptul de „destin” nucleul lor de aplicabilitate sociala. Societatea funcţiona exclusiv discriminatoriu. Nimeni nu putea scapa de destin, nici macar zeii. Sisif a fost cel care a incercat asta si s-a ales cu un vultur ce-i manca sistematic ficatul. O astfel de metafora e in masura sa arate ce i se poate intampla sclavului daca isi refuza soarta de a fi sclav. Numai ca de 2000 de ani incepand cu Isus si Spartakus sclavii de profesie au cam inceput sa se sinucida. Or acest lucru le cam stricau afacerile stapanilor. * Daca sinucigasii ar fi ramas doar cei 2 totul ar fi fost in regula, totul s-ar fi incadrat in limitele unei statistici favorabile. Insa acestia au raspandit doctrine cam nefavorabile printre sclavi si mercenarii din armata deopotriva.

Din acest moment teoria destinului religiilor antice a fost schimbata pe cea a liberului arbitru al crestinismului. Filosofii crestini insa au scris fara echivoc impotriva teoriei destinului dar asta nu inseamna ca umanitatea a putut scapa cu adevarat de destin. Diferenţa e ca incepand cu crestinismul era un pacat sa ai sclavi pe cand anticii acceptau deschis acest lucru. Insa era nevoie in continuare de munca sclavilor spre a cladi civilizaţia. Oricum, chiar daca nu a putut renunţa total la ideea destinului totusi sansa acordata intamplarii, hazardului a facut din crestinism o oferta mai buna pentru sufletul sclavului. Nu a fost cine stie ce castig pentru sclav insa a fost mai mult decat nimic. Daca pana atunci sclavul se impacase (sau nu) cu soarta de a fi sclav, mai nou el s-a impacat cu speranţa de a fi candva eliberat, mantuit. Cel puţin sclavul crestin nu a mai fost ucis daca refuza sa munceasca ci lasat in biserica si manastirea lui sa se roage si folosit la convingerea celorlalţi sclavi de anumite „invaţaturi” printre care si celebra „da-i cezarului ce-i al cezarului”.

Evident, promisiunea eliberarii nu a fost facuta in gura mare, fara echivoc ci mai voalat si mai inselator pentru ca se cam stia ca e o promisiune mincinoasa. Promisiunile demagogice ale politicienilor de astazi isi au originea in acest gen de promisiune pe care au forţat-o mai intai unii iudei iar apoi soldaţii romani. Cand e vorba de profit atunci legile si morala se pot usor modifica in asa fel incat sa devina faradelegi si imoralitate si sa le mai ramana doar numele din vechile forme. O fi fost ea sclavia considerata un pacat de catre noua religie dar se mai puteau da indulgenţe, se mai puteau rascumpara pacate, etc. In lumea civilizata sclavia clasica a fost eradicata total abia in secolul 19, la aproape 2 milenii de cand crestinismul o eradicase ideologic. Si atunci s-a intamplat astfel pentru ca era industriala a masinilor era mai profitabila. Masina putea lucra mai mult si mai exact. Noul cadru tehnologic putea in sfarsit sa scoata la iveala sentimentele morale ale umanitaţii. In loc de sclavul clasic legat in lanţuri si ameninţat avem muncitorul „liber” si doritor de mai mult. Chiar si asa, eliberarea juridica a sclavului nu a insemnat nici pe departe si eliberarea lui psihologica. „Moralele de sclav” si-au continuat inca stilul de viaţa care le-a facut sa supravieţuiasca secolelor si mileniilor: prin supunere. E trist de remarcat insa schimbarea cea mai importanta consta in principal in faptul ca stapanii au inţeles ca daca vor mai mult profit de pe urma sclavilor nu trebuie sa ii mai ameninţe ci doar sa le dea iluzia de egalitate, de nondiscriminare.

Odata cu crestinismul cultura occidentala a inceput un drum absurd, stufos si mincinos care poate fi sintetizat in maxima „Credo quia absurdum est” („Cred pentru ca e absurd”) . Din fericire umanismul insa a avut puterea sa revina prin niste figuri care au avut demnitatea si puterea sa infrunte minciunile gogonate ale autoritaţilor. Sistemului ideologic oficial a inceput sa crape si sa se clatine odata cu dubiile lui Hume, trecand prin criza descoperita de Kant si ajungand la concluziile radicale ale lui Nietzsche si demonstrate sistematic de Freud. Ideologia oficiala a continuat sa repare mereu si mereu aceste minciuni insa si si-a vazut orbeste de drumul ei inselator si inuman. Mincinoasele teorii ale dreptului, prevederile birocraţiei si declaraţiile politice inca fundamenteaza statul contemporan. Despre unele deja am discutat pe acest blog, urmeaza de analizat altele.

Teoriile antidestin au devenit mai pregnante pe masura ce libertatea sclavului a devenit mai mare in istorie. Teoreticienii profesionisti de astazi, inclusiv teoreticienii religiilor recunosc un rol minor al destinului in lume. Ateismul dimpotriva, l-a eradicat cu totul. Paradoxal, concepţia destinului este salvata tocmai de ambivalenţa originara a crestinismului care desi s-a luptat si se lupta cu teoria destinului totusi el este si cel care i-a fost salvatorul. In destin nu mai cred profesorii de filozofie de la universitaţi care deja au un statut privilegiat in societate si care au devenit popovaduitorii intamplarii si haosului. In destin cred mai nou sclavii contemporani pe care biserica ii educa asa cum i-a educat si acum 2000 de ani.

*Stiu ca religiosii vor spune ca de fapt Isus nu s-a sinucis si poate au dreptate din punct de vedere religios. Insa eu stiu in aceeasi maniera ca din punct de vedere practic si politic a refuza statutul de sclav si a declara ca stapanul nu are nici o putere asupra ta asa cum au facut cei doi asta ar fi insemnat pur si simplu sinucidere curata. La fel si in cazul celor pusi sa aleaga intre a fi ucisi de fiare in arena sau a se lepada de credinta. Tot un fel de sinucidere e. Adica daca cineva intra in cusca leului stiind ca acolo e un leu si e apoi ucis de leu asta nu mai e accident, intamplare nefericita ci tot o sinucidere. Ca dupa aceea sistemul s-a adaptat la aceste doctrine si sinuciderea a devenit dintr-o data cel mai mare pacat asta e o alta poveste pusa spre analiza in viitoarele articole.

Venice Biennale and the wide contemporary art under the magnifying glass of UAE pavilion

2009-10-30T15:42:00.000-07:00

31-10-2009

In romaneste aici:

This entry is continued from “Unite Arab Emirate at 2009 Venice Biennale” that I wrote on the “arte” blog in which I analyzed the presence of a strange and unusual pavilion at this year Venice Biennale. The UAE pavilion seems not to really taste the contemporary art but just uses it as an advertising platform. The result was this attitude: “let’s make a half of step into your home to show how much we love to stay outside”. I know that contemporary art sometime played this contradictory role by selling excrements to audience or playing absurd gestures or actions. But still, these manifestations seem to emerge from a depressive and uninterested soul but not from a sick greedy one. That is why these artists are perceived differentially, with more indulgence. On the other hand the UAE authorities seem that were hearing of some kind of Venice pavilion that might be just a little more expensive than a center town billboard or a prime-time commercial. That’s the way UAE get into the contemporary art tendencies! But it is 2009, it is a recession year so the lack of genuine cultural frame can be ignored for a while, it could be a (performative) makeup for the sick of Biennale’s better shaped budget.

In other countries there is a strong competition between artists in order to expose at Venice Biennale. In UAE not only that there is no such competition but there is no Venice Biennale specific cultural tradition. But that would not be a problem – the Gheorghe Gheorghiu University’s strategy that was used in 50-s might work here too. If the tourism industry is involved then the artists could simply be invented just like happened in Romania when the bourgeois were replaced by created automatically and insufficient trained physicians/academicians/officers etc. Anyway, after what is written on this blog I am pretty sure that these kind of artificial jobs are made for the old aristocracy even in the “right” civilized western society.

I see art more and more as overvaluation and even an artificial evaluation for some people that are accepted as artists when we already know that “everybody is an artist”. Of course there is got to be made the eternal mention that only some are good artists among all human beings and the rest are just bad artists. Among good artists there are even fewer that are appreciated as genius artists. They are selected by sirs/kings/bourgeois/ corporations/ curators for to built up an image. Vice versa is true also: without other sirs other kings, other bourgeois, other corporations that want to destroy the image of those above there would be no post mortem celebrities like Rembrandt, Jackson Pollock or Van Gogh. The difference between those artists and “everybody” which is an (smaller) artist is not so radical but just a degree one. It is the system, the cultural heritage that takes over this natural difference, overvaluates it and transforms it into the difference between light and darkness, good and evil, genius and beggar.
Nevertheless after those roads openers there are so many racketeers that adopt their technique and get rewarded in the name of their mentors who might have died unknown and in poverty. That makes me believe that the best artists (in a way that they represent the spirit of future) rarely go to Venice Biennale and when they go they are most of the time old and retired. The Venice Biennale as all kind of such events is a deal between politicians who make institutions for art, curator promoters politically promoted, curators who select the valuable artists and the artists that get under their skin. The new repositioned into contemporary art tower aristocratic mentalities knows instinctively to smell and promote themselves. Venice Biennale is probably the most important contemporary art event with the record number of viewers but under those social relationships there emerges that kind of bureaucracy that destroys the spirit of art. In spite of promotions and marketing strategies the Venice Biennale has something unauthentic inside just like the wide contemporary art has. The contemporary art (of lack of art) have partially reached these conclusions.

The differences between contemporary art and entertainment/advertising might not be noticed by the UAE authorities though they really seem to know what the last one is. Just like uneducated common people they simply do not have the proper knowledge to differentiate these two things. Paradoxically they might have right with this rough and naive analyze of art because this difference might be just (a cultural) snobbism.

I said indeed here that Venice Biennale is not a kind of Eurovision that promotes some countries image with pop music contest but at a further analyze seems that contemporary art as whole is such a lobby. In every Venice Biennale pavilion and in every art figure is a particular UAE pavilion dosage. I know, I heard other reasons about the UAE money that shaped the artists prizes etc, etc. But if we think this way then why won’t we go further and ask why the artist does not built a successfully company and become millionaire? But, to go even further with speculation, maybe that is what the artist actually does. Maybe the art itself is such an international advertising metacompany that built image for the privileged social classes.

Bienala de la Veneţia şi arta în general sub lupa pavilionului EAU

2009-10-30T15:24:00.000-07:00

31 10 2009

English version here

Acest articol este continuarea continuarea „Emiratele Arabe Unite la bienala de la Venetia“ scris pe blogul arte in care deplangeam prezenta unui pavilion ciudat, nefiresc la Bienala de la Venetia din acest an. Pavilionul EAU pare ca nu gusta pe de-a-ntregul arta contemporana dar care se folosesc de ea pentru o ciudata campanie publicitara. Rezultatul a fost o atitudine de genul „hai sa facem o jumatate de pas in casa voastra sa va spunem ce mult ne place noua afara!”. Stiu ca arta contemporana s-a jucat deseori cu acest tip de atitudine vanzand fecale sau realizand gesturi absurde. Dar parca astfel de manifestari consemnate vin cumva dintr-un suflet deprimat si dezinteresat si nu dintr-unul cuprins de o lacomie maladiva. Tocmai de asta acesti artisti sunt priviti altfel, cu mai multa ingaduinta. Dimpotriva, probabil ca autoritatile EAU au auzit ca un pavilion la Bienala de la Venetia costa ceva mai mult decat un panou in centrul orasului sau o reclama in audienta maxima. Si iata cum intra EAU in tendintele artei contemporane! Suntem in 2009, suntem intr-un an de criza, si iata ca se poate trece un pic cu vederea lipsa unui cadru cultural tipic, se poate cosmetiza (performativ) campania si astfel se mai poate rotunji bugetul bienalei. Banul face orice.
In alte tari e mare concurenta intre artisti pentru a expune la Bienala de la Venetia. Iata ca in cazul EAU nu numai ca nu exista o astfel de concurenta dar nu exista nici macar o traditie culturala specifica bienalei . Nu-i nimic - se poate actiona dupa planul Gheorghe Gheorghiu din Romania. Inventam niste artisti sa dea bine la industria turismului la fel cum s-a facut in anii 50 in Romania cand odata cu inlocuirea burghezilor din posturile cheie s-au creat pe banda rulanta doctori, academicieni, ofiteri etc. Oricum, dupa cele scrise pe acest blog eu sunt sigur ca inclusiv in societatile “drepte” din lumea civilizata multe astfel de posturi sunt la fel de artificial create ca si cele de tip Gheorghiu, pentru a da o forma mai umana vechii aristocratii.
In ceea ce ma priveste incep sa percep arta din ce in ce mai mult ca pe o supraevaluare si chiar o evaluare artificiala a unor oameni recunoscuti drept artisti in situatia in care „orice om e un artist“. Evident trebuie facuta eterna precizare cum ca unii sunt artisti mai slabi si altii, mai putini la numar, mai buni. Dintre cei buni se aleg cativa si mai putini carora li se atribuie statutul de artisti geniali. Ei sunt selectati de principi, regi, burghezi, corporatii si curatori pentru a le reprezenta imaginea. Viceversa e la fel de valabila : fara alti principi, alti regi, alti burghezi etc. ce vor sa compromita imaginea primilor nu ar exista nici artistii cu celebritate postuma ca Rembrandt, Jackson Pollock sau Van Gogh. Intre artistii mai buni de genul celor de mai sus si „orice om” care e artist (mai slab) exista la nivel cultural o diferenta radicala ci nu una de grad asa cum lasa sa se vada terminologia. Aici intervine sistemul, aici intervine cultura care preia o astfel de diferenta si o supraevalueaza nelimitat transformand-o in diferenta dintre bun si rau, lumina si intuneric, geniu si cersetor.
Oricum, pe langa acesti deschizatori de drumuri se cuibaresc atatia alti profitori care le adopta tehnica si pe care sistemul ii recompenseaza gras in numele maestrilor lor ramasi de multe ori nerecompensati si nerecunoscuti. Sunt sigur ca cei mai buni artisti (in sensul ca reprezinta mentalitatea viitorului) ajung la Bienala de la Venetia mai rar. Iar atunci cand ajung o fac in momentul in care ei insisi sunt devitalizati. Pentru ca de fapt Bienala de la Venetia este o afacere intre politicieni, promovatori de curatori, curatori si artistii care se baga pe sub pielea lor. Mentalitatile aristocratoide repozitionate mai nou in turnul de fildes al artei contemporane stiu sa se miroasa si sa se promoveze. Bienala de la Venetia e probabil cel mai titrat eveniment de arta contemporana cu record de vizitatori insa in astfel de relatii sociale se creeaza invariabil acel tip de birocratie care ucide spiritul artei. Asa ca in ciuda promovarii, reclamelor, strategiilor de marketing Bienala de la Venetia asa cum se prezinta astazi va exista o doza de neautentic, de fals asa cum exista in general in institutia artei. Arta (lipsei de arta) contemporana insasi a ajuns partial la aceste concluzii.
Probabil ca pentru autoritatile EAU nu exista vreo diferenta intre arta contemporana si publicitatea cu care sunt, se vede destul de bine familiarizati la fel cum nu exista nici pentru omul de rand needucat. Insa paradoxal s-ar putea sa aiba o mare dreptate cu toata naivitatea atitudinii lor iar diferenta in cauza se poate dovedi de fapt un mare snobism (cultural)
Spuneam eu aici ca bienala de la Venetia nu este un fel de Eurovizion care face o prezentare politico-turistica a unui spatiu politic ce poate deveni destinatie turistica insa de fapt cam asta e. In orice pavilion va exista o doza de EAU. Stiu, am auzit argumentele pro, ca de fapt cu banii de la arabi s-au rotunjit premiile artistilor etc. , etc. Dar daca ne gandim asa atunci s-ar pune mai departe intrebarea de ce nu si-ar face el artistul o companie de succes si de ce nu ar face el astfel rost de bani? Dar, mergand si mai departe cu speculatia, poate ca de fapt artistul asta si face. Pana la urma arta insasi este o metacompanie internationala de publicitate care face imagine unei anumite clase de privilegiati.

The laws 2. An example among so many others of discriminating application of laws in society

2009-08-22T07:09:00.000-07:00

22 august 2009

in romaeste aici

Continued from the previous entry

The most perfidious thing in all law codes that history recorded is the fact that they are painted like a free economical exchange. Everything seems to be fair change: one person gives to state some obligation, some duty and the state gives back some human rights. But in reality this so called deal covers a big thievery, a general social swindle. The most of such called liberties of contemporary society are too abstract and more or less inapplicable for the interest of common people. As pointed in previous entry the laws and the human rights are putted there just for propaganda reasons, to make a good impression about the kindness of society but they are not serving all the citizens but only some of them. Let’s just think about the spectacular but still banal “freedom of speech” that is supposed to be a very basic right of western modern civilization. But if we think further on the fact that the depressive disorders rise till 80 % of citizens then they should protest all the time because of this state of mind. Such a scenario with 80% of people complaining about their lives would simply collapse the social system because slaves would protest instead of being productive. The social system must interfere and manipulate the speech in order to prevent that and so the promised freedom won’t be as free as it shows itself. Take a look of how so well-known freedom of speech becomes actually a deception than an authentic liberty. Every law is just a piece of paper that could be always interpreted, manipulated and discriminatory used by those who control it. The liberties given by a certain law can be easily nullified by another law, stipulations or governmental measure so it would become favorable to the privileged ones. The opposite is as true as this: every abuse condemned by basic laws made by authorities against common people could be legalized by such later laws or stipulations. The periodical (so called) democratic election is just a poll with the main reason of measuring the slaves’ reaction concerning such work condition regarding their potential dissatisfaction and revolt against system. If this hostility is bigger than authorities expected then “the opposition parties” would have the task of absorbing it, to relax such social pressures on slaves and to calm down their potential hostility and to offer them illusions that they are not slaves. The fact that the president of USA is now a black man was possible because the system wanted to offer new illusions and new rights when their trust in it is falling down and down after Bush presidency. The system offered through Obama another but still different illusion in exchange for their docility and calming down their hostility. Right now the system works for building up another new illusion of the first woman president of USA: Hilary Clinton. But this is another story that I will cover in on of next entries. Let’s get back to the laws.

The way laws and court justice works is to be seen very clearly in the documentary „The 911 Chronicles Part One Truth Rising” . At the 7-th minute its author is harassed by police officers in order to prevent the public exhibit of his opinion about the 9 11. He believes that 9 11 was an inside job, a bluff made by authorities for gaining the public support for the Iraqi war. Those police officers were simply breaking the US constitution that says very clearly that the freedom of speech is guaranteed. If they would respect the constitution letter than Luke Rudkowski would be protected and served for using this “right”. This man was not doing any crime so the police intervention would not be excused by preventing his possible dangerous facts. The cops might not be very clever but basically they know something about legislation, they know that the community does not appreciate when police officers overreact and shows power just for fun. It is easy to deduce from here that the working field lower position policeman would not afford to question and harass Rudkowski by his own will, so breaking the law and risking of being observed by press. It is very probably that some superior, some boss just order him to “solve the problem”. And probably his boss also had got some orders from someone higher in this hierarchy. It is not hard to imagine were this leads to.

Here is the one example among so many others that “the biggest democracy” discretely and masked uses the dictatorship tools. Of course, this unusual journalist could suite the cop that broke his constitutional right or even the entire police institution for this. And probably after a pretty long trial, after paying a lawyer (or lawyers) he might probably win. At the first view system looks very good and shows that works indeed for citizen benefit. But this masquerade is just a very efficient method of negotiation of slave liberties and „human rights” with nobody figuring it up.

Statistically speaking the common people would not get involved in such a long and expensive journey in fighting with institutions. It is easier for her/him to shout up. So the manipulation “democracy” reaches the same results that dictatorship is getting by using force. On the other hand, if things go wrong in such a negotiation, the system could easily get rid of such a cop after using him as a sacrifice in slaves’ negotiation and perfidy sacrifice him for making a good image in the eyes of citizens. After getting into jail he might get a favorable press campaign and a quick forgiveness and rehabilitation. But for this there is public sympathy needed. If that does not come after a press campaign there is nothing else to do. That is the way things go. This is the policeman job just like the politician: they both receive and temper the slaves’ anger. It is absolutely astonishing how the system manages to turn slaves one against the others, to fight each others and to turn the crowd anger away from those who deserve it.

A typical example for such a situation is the case of former Romanian army general Victor Stănculescu. This general became the scapegoat for the crimes that army did against the people and defending the dictatorship in December 1989. He was convicted in order to wash up the criminal character of army itself because its first goal is to prevent and destroy any kind of slaves’ revolt under the cover of protecting from foreign invasions. But at the moment I was writing this entry Stanculescu had a very favorable image in media. He was shown as an innocent doddered and ill old man “far away from being a social danger”. After several years of prison now is time for some mercy. That kind of situation has a strong reverberation inside the ambivalent soul of slave. Freud pointed that very clearly: after killing the master/king/origin father the slave starts a depressive penitence *. But, for now the public opinion seems to be indifferent to such media attempts and accept the first accept the scapegoat issue to solve the army crimes matter. But there might be other such attempts in the future.

Unfortunately the contemporary developed society could not survive without wars and as classical society makes good image of them. The wars image is very carefully build by state propaganda so that the mentality of war as universal justice (mentality of public and civil society opine) and the war as a personal revenge to somebody no matter who (mentality of soldier) would join together even they are so opposite one another. The main reason for army is the negotiation of slaves’ revolt and the social system is always prepared to strengthen its false pretext of protecting and serving the people and civilization against “primitive abuses” even by artificial creating new conflicts all over the world. It is obvious that in Stanculescu’s case the Romanian authorities try to save the dog watch honor by showing the care for the sacrifice of dying in mission of those who fights in Iraq and/or those who protects the neoaristocrats against slaves’ anger. The system is in a very delicate situation by negotiation the future of some guy like Stanculescu. Basically convicting the crime of shooting one’s own people brings down the every soldier natural born sadism by being convicted for “doing its job” which would balance the recruiting new military mercenaries in the future. Among the risk of being killed in the battlefield such a potential hero would find himself in the position of loosing the military honors too or even worse, of getting to jail for a wile. On the other hand there is the civil voice and public opinion that might change the perception of “military heroes” if the 1989 crimes would be covered muşamalizate and the murderers would get away with that. This would mean that everyone’s equality in front of law is just a piece of paper.

Because of Romanian poverty for now people uses bribe to be recruited and sent to fight in Iraq. But the today’s kids that party in the clubs and shout from all their lungs “Peace&Love” might not be willing to sell their body to the system in the future. They might probably refuse to fight against their brothers the slaves when revolt. That is why the system struggles so hard to build up a good image of army for future plans. That is why the so-called separated powers of state as Ju$tice and Pre$ work together so well to solve this problem as smooth as possible. For now they failed in this case but they will keep trying so to prove they were doing the best they could.

* But this feeling is not human natural as he believed. This kind of penitence is just the consequence of wild education that common people gets from the system from the day she/he is born until becomes adult.

Legile 2. Un caz printre atatea altele de aplicare discriminatorie a legilor

2009-08-22T07:01:00.000-07:00

english version here

Continuare la articolul precedent

Ce e cel mai perfid in toate sistemele de legi cate au existat e faptul ca ele se prezinta ca un schimb economic liber. Totul pare un schimb corect: eu iti dau tie statule obligatia mea iar tu imi dai mie niste drepturi. In realitate acest presupus schimb ascunde o mare escrocherie generalizata. Cele mai multe din libertati sunt abstracte si care mai de care mai neaplicabile pentru omul de rand. Asa cum s-a vazut in articolul precedent ele sunt superfluu expuse in codurile de legi sunt puse doar formal si se aplica doar pentru o anumita parte a cetatenilor. Daca toti cetatenii si-ar lua toate libertatile promise atunci sistemul s-ar colapsa instantaneu. Sa luam de exemplu banala si mult prea trambitata libertate de expresie care teoretic este o libertate de baza a civilizatiei occidentale. Daca mai luam in calcul ca tulburarile depresive in randul cetateanului de rand ating o incidenta de aproximativ 80% si daca ne imaginam o libera exprimare a nemultumirilor de orice fel a acestor sentimente depresive atunci ar trebui ca 80% din forta de munca sa protesteze nonstop. Ori un astfel de scenariu ar duce efectiv la colapsarea sistemului social deoarece sclavii ar protesta in loc sa munceasca si sa fie productivi. Sistemul trebuie sa intervina si sa manipuleze expresia in asa fel incat libertatea promisa sa nu fie chiar atat de libera. Iata cum libertatea de expresie are limitele ei care o face mai curand o caricatura de libertate decat o libertate autentica. Legea scrisa pe hartie este o hartie care oricand poate fi interpretata, manipulata si folosita discriminatoriu de cei ce o aplica. Orice prevede si ofera legea poate oricand fi anulat de o alta lege, prevedere sau masura guvernamentala daca asta e in favoarea neoarsitocratilor. Viceversa este la fel de valabila: orice abuz din partea autoritatilor condamnat de legile in vigoare poate fi legiferat de alte legi sau masuri guvernamentale. Votul electoral realizat odata la cativa ani vine apoi sa ia pulsul reactiei sclavilor la o astfel de masura riscanta. Daca nemultumirea e prea mare atunci opozitia va incerca sa o absoarba si astfel sistemul sa continue in forma sa neschimbata dar mereu „schimbatoare”. Faptul ca presedinte al SUA a ajuns un negru este un drept in plus pe care sistemul l-a oferit sclavilor in situatia in care increderea cetateanului de rand in sistem se afla in scadere progresiva in special dupa guvernarea Bush. Sistemul a oferit o alta iluzie sclavilor in schimbul docilitatii si suspendarii revoltei. Urmeaza alte iluzii aruncate pe piata si vad ca deja se contureaza imaginea primei femei presedinte in persoana lui Hilary Clinton o alta premiera menita sa creeze iluzii. Dar despre asta voi scrie in amanunt intr-unul dintre articolele urmatoare.

Modul in care functioneaza legile se poate observa destul de clar in documentarul „The 911 Chronicles Part One Truth Rising” unde la minutul 7 se poate vedea aici cum autorul sau, Luke Rudkowski este discret hartuit de acei politisti pentru a-l impiedica sa isi exprime parerea despre atentatele din septembrie 2001 pe care el le considera provocate din interior, o cacialma pentru a porni apoi o campanie militara in Irak. Evident ca in legislatia SUA dreptul la libera exprimare este garantat. In mod normal politia ar fi trebuit sa il protejeze pe acest om in exercitarea unui astfel de „drept”. Acel om nu facea nimic rau cu protestul sau deci nu se poate invoca o interventie de prevenire a unor astfel de fapte periculoase pe care el le-ar fi facut. N-or fi ei foarte destepti politistii dar, macar ca defect profesional, cam stiu un pic de legislatie, stiu ca nu e bine sa iti arati inutil puterea. E simplu sa ne dam seama ca un astfel de politist cu grad inferior, cu munca de teren nu si-ar fi permis de unul singur sa il ia la intrebari pe personajul nostru incalcand practic legea si riscand sa fie sanctionat si condamnat de presa. Cineva i-a ordonat sa „rezolve problema”. Acel cineva probabil ca a primit si el ordine de la cineva si mai sus plasat si nu e chiar greu sa mergem pe firul situatiei si sa gasim originea unui astfel de ordin.

Iata cum „cea mai mare democratie” foloseste mijloacele dictaturii in mod mascat. Evident, jurnalistul nostru atipic ar fi putut da in judecata politia sau pe politistul in cauza. Si, dupa un probabil destul de lung proces, dupa serviciile unui bun si costisitor avocat (sau avocati) ar fi castigat procesul. La prima vedere pare ca sistemul functioneaza perfect pentru cetatean, ca drepturile sale „sunt sfinte”. In realitate toata aceasta mascarada este o foarte eficienta si discreta metoda de negociere a libertatilor si drepturilor sclavului (garantate de constitutie).

Din punct de vedere statistic cetateanul simplu nu se implica intr-un astfel de lung si costisitor drum. E mult mai simplu pentru el sa „isi tina gura”. Iata cum „democratia” reuseste prin manipulare ceea ce face si dictatura cu forta bruta. Pe de alta parte dupa ce l-a folosit pe post de „carne de tun” in negocierea cu sclavii sistemul se poate debarasa de un astfel de politist sacrificandu-l pentru a-si mentine o buna impresie in ochii cetatenilor. Dupa aceea o campanie de presa sau vreo gratiere subita s-ar putea sa il reabiliteze. Daca totusi nimeni nu se induioseaza de soarta lui atunci… asta e! Asa merge treaba. Asta e jobul lui la fel ca si cel al politicianului: sa primeasca la un moment dat si efectele furiei sclavului. Este absolut fascinant cu cata abilitate reuseste sistemul sa asmuta sclavii unii impotriva altora si astfel sa deturneze furia multimii departe de cei pentru care lucreaza!

Un exemplu tipic pentru o astfel de situaţie se întâmplă în România de câtva timp încoace relativ la fostul general al armatei române Victor Atanasie Stănculescu. Pe acest general a picat măgăreaţa pentru crimele armatei asupra poporului în 1989 şi a fost condamnat la închisoare pentru acele crime în numele instituţiei care are în ameninţarea cetăţenilor şi eventuala înăbuşire în sânge a revoltei lor îndeletnicirea sa de bază.

Însă la momentul când scriam acest articol Stănculescu se bucura de o imagine bună în presă. Este prezentat ca un bătrânel inocent, senil şi bolnav „care numai pericol social nu e”. După câţiva ani de puşcărie e timpul pentru milă. Asta are o puternică rezonanţă în sufletul ambivalent al sclavului. Freud a spus-o clar şi răspicat: după ce îşi ucide stăpânul/ regele/tatăl originar sclavul e cuprins de o remuşcare astenică*. Dar se pare că deocamdată opinia publică a rămas indiferentă la încercările presei şi preferă să accepte găluşca ţapului ispăşitor care să ia asupra lui crimele armatei. Dar se pare că vor mai fi încercări.

Din păcate societatea civilizată contemporană nu poate trăi fără războaie şi îşi face în continuare provizii de imagine în care să încapă şi mentalitatea războiului ca justiţie universală (cea a opiniei publice) şi cea a războiului ca răzbunare personală pe cineva anume nu contează cine (cea a militarului propriuzis). Sistemul foloseşte armata principial pentru a juca pe tărâmul negocierii revolte sclavului şi e în stare să întărească pretextul fals al protejării propriului popor sau chiar a civilizaţiei de către „nedreptăţile primitive” chiar inventând pur şi simplu artificial conflicte în diferite părţi ale globului. Evident că în cazul Stănculescu sistemul încearcă să-şi salveze câinele de pază să arate grija pentru angajatul său pentru ca potenţialii luptători în Irak şi/sau bodyguarzi ai neoaristocraţilor în faţa furiei sclavilor să fie dispuşi să moară în misiune. Sistemul se află într-o situaţie absolut jenantă în negocierea sorţii unuia ca Stănculescu. Mai întâi condamnarea lui pentru crima de a trage în propriul popor demoralizează sadismul inerent oricărui militar care se vede în situaţia de a fi condamnat „daca îşi face meseria” ceea ce va cântări greu la recrutarea noilor mercenari militari în viitor. Pe lângă riscul iniţial acceptat de a pieri în luptă un astfel de potenţial recrut se vede şi pus în situaţia de a-şi pierde şi onorurile, ba chiar de a fi trimis un pic la răcoare. Apoi societatea civilă şi opinia publică îşi poate schimba radical opinia faţă de „eroii militari” în situaţia în care crimele din 1989 ar fi total muşamalizate. Asta înseamnă că nu toţi sunt egali în faţa legii şi că unii pot scăpa bine mersi chiar dacă au ucis.

Deocamdată se dă şpagă în România pentru a prinde un loc în batalioanele ce luptă din Irak. Dar s-ar putea ca în viitor copiii care merg astăzi în cluburi şi care strigă în gura mare peace &love să nu mai aibă apetit pentru a-şi vinde carnea sistemului. Şi asta înseamnă că vor refuza să mai lupte şi împotriva fraţilor lor sclavii în situaţia de revoltă. Aşa că o astfel de măsură de imagine merită făcută încă de pe acum. Iată cum separatele puteri în stat Ju$titia şi Pre$a conlucrează fiecare pentru a rezolva această problemă cât mai discret posibil. Deocamdată au eşuat în acest caz dar vor mai fi încercări. Să se arate totuşi că s-a făcut tot posibilul.

Scoaterea lui Stănculescu drept ţap ispăşitor seamănă flagrant de bine cu situaţia poliţistului care l-a împiedicat pe Luke Rudkowski să protesteze şi pe care mai întâi şefii l-au obligat să încalce legea prin ordinele pe care i le-au dat iar apoi îl scot vinovat prin intermediul justiţiei pentru fapta lui pentru a potoli revolta acestuia. Ăsta este destinul mercenarilor: sunt nişte cârpe ceva mai elegante cu care neoarsitocraţii îşi şterg mizeriile.

* Însă nu face parte din constituţia naturală a omului un astfel de sentiment aşa cum credea el. Pur şi simplu o astfel de remuşcare este consecinţa educaţiei sălbatice, a educaţiei supunerii la care este supus sclavul din fragedă pruncie.

The laws; a brief introduction into Ju$tice machinery

2009-06-28T12:01:00.000-07:00

28-06-2009

In romaneste aici:

Before I describe a concrete case that shows how Ju$tice works I would make a brief analyze of judicial system regarding the citizens. The legislation is the accurate or even identical copy of global psychic system Conscious- Unconscious relationship. Actually the state could not be something else since it is a product of human psychic system and developed by a perfidious cleverness. Here comes into my mind a case described by Freud of a person that was commanded into the hypnotic state to open his umbrella several minutes after he wakes up. Indeed that is exactly what happened next after his waking up. But when asked about the meaning of his gesture that person answered serenely: “I just felt like”. That is the exact way the sate works except that the network movement of commands is more complex and shapes up not in several minutes of hypnosis but during the whole life. “I just felt like” that everybody does when practice her/his profession it is the illusion of freedom that system offer in exchange for its benefits. Being a legacy of classical slavery state the contemporary neoslavery state spread out through Unconscious its interests into the most hided parts of society.

Every profession is meant to produce objects or satisfactions for masters or to supervise the slaves or bring down their spirit in order to bring down their willing to rise up. “I just felt like” is felt by every slave when does not work, when gets bored and when not feeling well if do not execute the masters command. Such a feeling is critical for the global economy function. This feeling is build up by the state institutions using the spiritual mutilations during many generations. We live in the Matrix meant to satisfy the needs of such cyborgs of traveling on the moon or of having luxury residences and, finally of having a rival or somebody at his/her knees from whom to extract the feeling of power. Such a bizarre need is pointless today but it satisfy the reflexes of community old big robbers called masters that today masters have from. Stealing and enslaving the innocent community is the base of civilization but instead of old sieges today we have the state that manages to robber more efficiently than the power of armies. The rules, the procedures and the legislation are the tools that mainly replaced the killing weapons but, as the cause survives in the effect the classical weapons now technological developed are good supports for such a “democratic institutions” that serve luxury neorobberers.

But inside every legislative there are two unwritten and untold big laws universally applied with the use of the others. The first one is that the master has the right to steal from slave. This kind of robbery was called “divine right” in the past. Today “divine right” turned into artificial, exclusive and luck of concurrence praiseworthiness that masters offer one another. The first one is that the slave is not allowed to steal from master and has no right to take back its damage of being stolen before. These basic unfair laws are the untold latent content of Ju$tice and the manifest ones that that state show to people is actually meant to cover up and mend their image.

The constitution is the base of legislation and the base of state functionality. But there is nowhere to be found in any constitution such two basic laws. On the contrary, at the first sight the constitution convince the reader that such a thing is quite impossible no matter how obvious is in real life. The state builds up a complex system of laws to mask their discriminating and inhuman face and to artificially create a more natural aspect. This cosmetic strategy involves 4 types of laws or human rights.

The most important laws for the master minority are the compelling and abusive laws that basically are used for what the masters did during all the civilization: that is to collect taxis that support their parasite situation in society. Any kind of law settlement and restriction of citizen’s behavior reveal this interest of parasite goal. These laws actually limit the liberty of slaves and help increase the liberty of masters. The social privileged ones overuse the need of human being to accept some restrictions in exchange for living in society. The press or the election campaigns measure this collective acceptance or dissatisfaction about these restrictions in order to prevent the slave’s revolt. The most of the people does not figure up the way that this general civilization robbery goes and everything seems very smooth and clean. I pointed here the need of developed society for half sleepy and not very smart people.
Other laws are artificial rights (of human being) because they show nothing new to the natural life of people. Their first purpose is to cover up the trust of people in the other laws and to give them the impression that the laws are good and very helpful. In law constitution one could find rights like “the right of life, of marriage, of drinking water, of breathing air etc.” with the subliminal induced idea that all these realities of natural life would be actually the benefits offered by state.
Other laws are partially applicable or completely inapplicable because there are no social conditions for applying them. They are putted into law constitutions for propaganda reasons to make people trust in the system but they will never bring to all the people their promises. They promise natural rights to people but these “rights” are the exchange coin that system uses for the labor of slaves. So called “the right of home” or something like it is just on paper. Even in the western countries there are homes that look more like lairs than like houses. If the slave stops being productive any more than this so called right disappears just like that. The banks with their credits system of mortgage works in this way.
Other laws are deceiving and contradictory to their own enounces. They give the false impression that helps people but actually hide the state interest of manipulation and dehumanization. For example “the right of education” is just the obligation of becoming highly efficient, of getting used to the work in factory since early age. “The right of information” works only with manipulation filter information. When it comes for intimate details of institutions activity, of future social projects and laws then that information are discreetly kept away from citizen’s attention or classified as state secrets. If the urban space are suffocated by panels and billboards that obsessively plays political news or commercials that is presented by authorities as the respecting “the right of information” of citizen. It is easy to see that this “right of information” is actually the greedy authorities’ need for manipulation. What is really important for the citizen to know, the dark sides of social system, the making of political decisions, the money functionality or the detailed study of legislation is out of this deceiving “right of information”.

In the next blog entry I will continue this general description of the way that Ju$tice works by bring up to analyze a real case .

Legile. O sumara incursiune generala asupra functionarii Ju$titiei

2009-06-28T11:50:00.000-07:00

english version here:

Inainte de a oferi descrierea unui exemplu concret de functionare a Ju$titiei voi face o sumara analiza a sistemului juridic in relatie directa cu cetateanul. Pentru mine legislatia este copia fidela sau chiar identica a relatiei dintre Constient si Inconstient la nivel de psihic global. Ca produs al psihicului si ajutat de o inteligenta perfida in fond statul nu poate sa fie altceva decat aceasta relatie. Imi vine in minte cazul enuntat de Freud cu un subiect caruia i s-a cerut in starea de hipnoza sa desfaca umbrela la cateva minute dupa ce se va trezi. Chiar asa s-a intamplat. La intrebarile asistentei cu privire la sensul gestului sau subiectul a raspuns senin : „asa mi-a venit”. In acelasi mod functioneaza si statul doar ca reteaua de circulatie a comenzilor este mult mai complexa si vizeaza nu doar cateva minute ale hipnozei ci o viata intreaga. Acel „asa mi-a venit” e de fapt iluzia de libertate pe care sistemul o ofera in mod perfid oricarei profesii. Ca mostenitor al statului sclavagist clasic statul neosclavagist contemporan si-a raspandit interesele pe cale inconstienta in cele mai ascunse parti ale societatii.

Fiecare profesie este menita fie sa produca bunuri/satisfactii diferite stapanilor fie sa supravegheze productivitatea sclavilor sau sa se scada moralul in asa fel incat sa le piara ideea de revolta. „Asa mi-a venit” o resimte fiecare sclav atunci cand nu munceste, cand se plictiseste si cand nu se simte bine daca nu executa comenzile stapanilor. Un astfel de sentiment este indispensabil pentru functionarea economiei generale. El are in spate un intreg sistem de dezumanizare care se intinde pe mutilarea spirituala a unor generatii intregi. In realitate traim intr-un Matrix menit sa satisfaca nevoia unora de a calatori pe luna, de a se refugia in resedinte luxoase si, in final de a avea un rival sau un semen la picioare pe care sa il umileasca si din care sa extraga sentimentul de putere. O astfel de ultima nevoie nu are nici un scop in zilele noastre doar ca acestea sunt reflexele vechilor mari jefuitori numiti seniori, stramosi ai actualilor cyborgi care le-au transmis aceasta molima morala. Jefuirea si inrobirea comunitatilor inocente este baza civilizatiei dar in locul vechilor asedii astazi avem statul care este mult mai eficient decat jefuirea prin forta armata. Regulile, procedurile si in principal legislatia este instrumentul ce a luat in buna parte locul vechilor arme de foc insa, dupa cum cauza supravietuieste in efect acestea au ramas in continuare suport fidel neojefuitorilor de lux.

Doua legi nescrise si nespuse insa universal aplicabile cu ajutorul celorlalte sunt importante in legislatie. Prima este ca stapanul are voie sa fure de la sclav. Tipul asta de hotie permisa in cazurile privilegiatilor social se numea in trecut "Drept divin". Astazi „dreptul divin„ se manifesta pur si simplu ca merit artificial, merit in absenta concurentei si dat de stapani lor insisi. Ce-a de-a doua este ca sclavul nu are voie sa fure de la stapan si nu are voie sa incerce sa isi recupereze paguba. Aceste doua legi inumane sunt continutul latent, nespus al Ju$titiei iar toate celelalte legi spuse sunt menite sa le carpeasca si sa le ascunda de ochii lumii pe acestea.

Constitutia este baza legislatiei. Acolo sunt prezentate legile de baza dupa care functioneaza statul. Nicaieri in acest cod fundamental de legi nu este prezentata o astfel de realitate. Ba dimpotriva. La prima citire orice constitutie convinge cititorul ca asa ceva este cu adevarat imposibil desi in acest mod functioneaza efectiv statul tehnologic contemporan. Pornind de la functionarea latenta a acestor legi statul a creat un intreg stufaris de alte legi care sa le mascheze caracterul discriminatoriu si inuman al acestora si sa le cosmetizeze putin, sa le dea un aspect natural. In continutul manifest al legislatiei exista patru tipuri de legi sau drepturi ale cetateanului.

Cele mai importante pentru minoritatea stapanilor sunt legile constrangatoare si abuzive care in principiu se refera la ce au stiut foarte bine sa faca stapanii: sa colecteze impozitele sau taxele din care sa isi creeze situatia lor de paraziti sociali. Orice reglementare si orice limitare a comportamentului cetateanului cu ajutorul legislatiei ascunde un astfel de interes. Acest tip de legi in plan concret micsoreaza libertatea omului de rand si o maresc pe cea a privilegiatilor sociali. Pornind de la nevoia nativa a omului de a se asocia in grup si de a-si crea legi de convietuire, adica de necesitatea constrangerii, statul discriminatoriu isi permite cresterea nivelului de constrangere. Institutii ca presa sau votul iau pulsul cu privire la gradul de acceptare sau de nemultumire fata de aceste supraconstrangeri in asa fel incat sa previna revolta sclavilor. Cei care nu au suficienta inteligenta incat sa le poata anticipa scopurile nesatioase nu isi pot imagina o astfel de escrocherie generalizata a civilizatiei si astfel totul se face foarte discret. In ce masura statul clasic si contemporan are nevoie de astfel de cetateni adormiti pe jumatate sau cu un nivel intelectual scazut am aratat aici.
Altele legi sunt drepturi artificiale (ale omului) deoarece practic nu aduc nimic nou starii naturale a omului. Ele sunt menite sa acopere increderea celorlalte in ochii sclavului manipulabil dar care de fapt reprezinta realitatii naturale ale vietii. De exemplu "dreptul la viata, la casatorie, la bautul de apa, respiratul de aer " cu pretentia inconstienta ca astfel de realitati ale vietii insasi ar fi beneficii pe care chipurile le-ar acorda statul.
Altele sunt partial aplicabile sau inaplicabile deoarece nu exista socialmente conditiile pentru aplicarea lor. Ele sunt puse acolo pur si simplu ca masura de propaganda necesara increderii in sistem si niciodata nu vor aduce concret rezultatul promis. Cumva ele sunt menite sa ofere ceva drepturi nenaturale sclavului dar in realitate asa ceva nu se poate intampla deoarece aceste drepturi sunt cele care momesc sclavul sa ofere munca lui la schimb . Asanumitul „drept la locuinta” sau ceva de acest gen exista doar pe hartie. Exista case care seamana mai mult a barloguri decat a locuinte inclusiv in tarile dezvoltate. Daca sclavul inceteaza subit sa mai fie productiv atunci acest drept dispare ca prin minune si omul nostru isi pierde locuinta cat ai zice peste. Bancile cu sistemele creditelor si ipotecilor functioneaza perfect in acest sens.
Alte legi sunt inselatoare si contradictorii cu propria lor enuntare. Ele dau impresia ca ofera drepturi cetatenilor dar de fapt ele ascund actiunea sistematica de manipulare si dezumanizare. De exemplu "dreptul la educatie" este pur si simplu obligatia la a deveni eficient si a te obisnui cu munca in fabrica inca din frageda pruncie. De asemenea "dreptul la informatie" functioneaza doar cand este vorba de informatii trecute prin filtrul manipularii. Informatii intime despre functionarea institutiilor, despre viitoare proiecte sau legi sunt tinute discret in afara atentiei cetateanului de rand sau clasate ca secrete de stat. Faptul ca spatiul urban se sufoca cu monitoare pe care ruleaza obsesiv stiri politic(ianist)e si reclame comerciale este prezentat ca o respectare a autoritatilor a acestui "drept fundamental" al cetateanului. In realitate acest „drept la informare” este de fapt o nevoia lacoma a autoritatilor pentru manipulare. Ceea ce este cu adevarat important de stiut pentru omul de rand, zonele obscure ale sistemului, luarea deciziilor politice, functionarea monedei sau studiul amanuntit al legislatiei nu mai apartine „dreptului la informatie”. Atunci acest "drept" dispare ca prin minune si astfel isi arata adevaratul sens.

In urmatorul articol voi continua aceasta descriere generala a modului in care functioneaza Ju$titia cu analiza unui caz concret.

A murit Matei Calinescu

2009-06-25T12:12:00.000-07:00

25-06-2009

Niciodata nu am avut ca natiune (in masura in care termenul "natiune" nu e total lipsit de continut) un varf de lance in materie de estetica si filosofie. Eugen Ionescu a fost mai mult un scriitor decat un teoretician. Cioran a fost mai mult un eseist. Blaga a fost prea national si, paradoxal, prea pretentios pentru simplitatea romaneasca. Dar si ... prea putin universal. Noica e tot pe acolo. Petre Tutea e unul dintre cei mai intarziati teoreticieni. Cred ca l-au retrogadat torturile inchisorilor comuniste. Eliade e singurul cu care se poate compara atat in privinta anvergurii internationale cat si cea a complexitatii operei. Dar parca a fost un pic cam servil lui Jung in materie de filosofie.

Matei Calinescu a fost cam primul astfel de roman. El aspart gheata culturala. "Fetele modernitatii" e o lucrare respectata in toata lumea. A creat o teorie originala si universala despre evolutia culturii. Daca teoriile sale seamana un pic cu ale lui Foucault sau altii totusi nu se raporteaza la ei in asa maniera in care Eliade o face la Jung fie si involuntar.

Pentru mine postmodernismul e o chestiune dubioasa. Insusi Matei Calinescu mi-a spus fara echivoc ca nici pentru el nu mai insemna mare lucru. Dar pentru faptul ca a fost acolo la construirea lui teoretica merita tot respectul nostru.

Nu sunt un mare nationalist insa ma simt mandru ca intr-o societate romaneasca plina de escroci la costum si cravata sau de intarziati contemporani iata ca cineva a reusit sa se desprinda si sa isi construiasca un loc in istoria culturii. L-am intalnit fata in fata, am stat de vorba cu el fapt pe care n-am sa il uit niciodata. Mi s-a partut un monument de simplitate si claritate la fel ca si scrierile sale. Desi am putine puncte comune cu el in materie de preocupari artistice si teoretice totusi simplitatea din "Fetele moderintatii" m-a influentat decisiv. "Contradictiile, iluziile si virtutile postmodernismului" pe care am scris-o in anul 2003 i se datoreaza exclusiv. Nu cred ca as fi scris-o daca nu as fi citit "Fetele moderintatii" .

The masters. The mercenaries. The slaves

2009-05-20T11:58:00.000-07:00

20-may-2009

In romaneste aici:

In the last blog entry I made a short analysis of particular civilized human being psychic regarding the influences of civilization during the centuries. Haeckel and then Freud showed how the primitive human being survives into the civilized one or how the child survives into the adult person. I am going to cover the part that is missing between the primitive culture and the childhood. I think we can understand better the human being and the society that lives in if make this connection and complete its evolution chain.

This connection between these periods is the classical civilization. That means classical culture and colonialism witch is the relation between slave and the master. Such a relation survives in contemporary society as the primitive survives in contemporaneous. The classical hermetic separation between slave and master is to be found in contemporary society also but this image is very undercovered. The (official) culture made such an artificial and untruthful distinction between the classical slave and the contemporary worker so that these two concepts look like totally different one from another. In fact these are almost identical. The only difference between them relies in the fact that the violent weapons that classical slave was threatened in order to work for master was replaced in modern society by manipulation and big lies. Today the violent weapons are used by masters only these "peacefully" ones fail in convincing the slave to work.

It is true indeed that the classical slave disappeared as classical culture disappeared. Only the mafia or some small work Traficant band sometimes uses classical slavery. But if the contemporary slaves are different from classical ones that does not mean that that slavery just disappeared but it just only transformed. This change is very small in many cases for contemporary people.

Nevertheless the contemporary culture manipulation modified in such a level the common perception of such reality so that if an extraterrestrial creature would read the school books and watch TV for a wile then would be sure that the social hermetic separation between slaves and masters is simply gone just like cholera or plague. The social deep manipulation developed after the early Christianity experience that took position against Greek-roman slavery and also after the more or less hypocrite reactions of western traditional humanism. But the civilization responded to such potential revolt of slaves with a as a huge propaganda system meant to clean up the dirty image of social system. The causes for such a strategy are two:

The development of technology that transformed the classical slaves work into machines work.
The revolt of slaves with the risk of being killed by them. The classical hero might die by the sword as well and French Revolution showed this very clearly.

So the development of technology and the experience of slaves uprising for rights and revenging forced the masters to look for another ways of stealing their goods. The masters decided to offer more personal satisfactions and more freedom to the old slave like the right of getting married, the freedom of speech or the abolishment of classical slavery that authorities enforce their image with. But the contemporary social system developed in parallel huge propaganda machinery which in fact cancels these liberties and just builds into the slaves mind the illusion of being free. But in the end the reality of stealing goods from slaves using all kind of procedures is the same in the contemporary social system as in the old classical one. The state is meant to protect the (neo)aristocracy and to provide it goods from the slaves in exchange for nothing but lies and false ideals. The liberties that some died for are paid recently with the propaganda slave soul mutilation.

But to explain in more details the way the modern social system works I will simply use the structure of old and efficient armies. The modern social system actually developed from old armies and inherited their bad habits as well. The Spartan society exists in different degrees in every developed modern society. There are still slaves that produce goods, there are mercenaries or warriors that threaten them to accept giving up their goods in exchange for life and, last but not least, there the cyborgs, the aristocrat cast that is the "ultimate goal" of the other two. The relation between the slaves and masters ate very much the same with the thief and its victim. Using this kind of relationship betweens citizens and getting used to it for centuries and with little help from school make the social system a mafia at a very high level as pointed here.

People know what slaves and masters are and I kept talking about them on this blog. Further more I would like to analyze the mercenaries. Traditionally they are that kind of people that realized that is much easier to steal fro the others under the weapons threatening than produce goods on their own. In the developed society the mercenaries are that kind of slaves very unhappy with their situation and very close to uprising. Such potential situation is very unconstructive for authorities/masters because slaves population would not be so profitable if fight back. There are two consequences of slaves uprising: they could be decimated by the power of master’s weapons or they could win the battle and free themselves. In both cases there could be big wastage of slaves useful or master’s inestimable lives. So the nowadays social system developed an agile ability of discovering and protecting such potential revolt leaders of slaves. Instead of leading a slave revolt such powerful characters could be isolated in all kinds of state positions and be calmed down. Nowadays slavery is not made with the concrete threatening of killing weapons anymore but with the equivoque threatening so the revolt may stop before actually begin. Instead of classical mercenaries that use that killing weapons there developed new kind of mercenaries, those who handle the weapons of manipulation and persuasion.

Anyway, starting from classical armies and ending at the contemporary state, the mercenaries are half masters and half slave. They are the slaves charged by the masters to control and supervise the productive slaves. Like in the past they are the used for conquest and subdue the unprotected communities so to be systematically stolen. They are slaves regarding the masters that they serve and masters regarding the actual slaves they supervise. Actually supervising the workers is their job.

The contemporary state is huge and diabolic machinery that safely extract and process the work of slaves. There are no state powers separations for so-called democratic equilibrium but just division of tasks and co-laboration for the maxim efficiency of convincing the slave to work and maximum profit. This is the main reason for mercenaries. Those that participate to such a bluff finally loose their soul and shape their beliefs, conceptions and mentalities in the light of the system they serve. Those are mercenaries!

The ju$tice, the police, the army, the school, the government, the parliament and all the institutions are similar to the cavalry, infantry, vanguard and other structures of old armies. The modern armies of mercenaries do not kill with the swords or fire weapons anymore but with the Chinese drop of consciousness dismemberment. Like all the army this huge cultural and legislative mercenary’s army could not survive without robbery the innocent communities as pointed here. Further than nice look that presents itself at a free and democratic debate, as a natural feedback of social forces the open society is just a bunch of mean interests that parasites the work of slaves. "Public debate" is just propaganda. Political struggle is just a pray (slave work) negotiation between predators.

At this particular moment must be made the distinction between the slave-master relationship and the division of tasks in a communitarian activity like hunting where every member of community takes its place. Wild nature looks better than human civilization. Even when alfa individuals of a pack of predators chase away the omega ones there is still a pack. The weaker sometimes steal some bites from the kill. In the civilized society there are the mercenaries only that can get some pieces from the masters’ greed. The developed society is hermetic. The masters live in another social, ethical and existential layer. They are protected by the threatening big fences an guarded by armed stony-faced mercenaries.

The slave of classical and contemporary society is not allowed to take part in this kind of hunt as a hunter because it is the hunted one. Just like a pray chased by predators the contemporary slave is chased since it is born for all its life in order to become a slave. With their pathological appetite the masters helped by the mercenaries systematically shapes the slaves population with statistics, manipulation and "ethical correctness" to become next toilets washers, street cleaners and garbage carriers.

The power to escape this nightmare and to free oneself by this manipulation yoke is the power to forget whatever the system teaches starting form family and continuing with the school and ending with the job. Some manage to escape slavery and become mercenaries. But there are very few that can escape the big mercenaries’ mentality that slave’s one survives in. That is possible. The system can afford such a small risk because most of them will follow the manipulation course.

In the next entry I will show some real facts to sustain such general description made here.

Stăpanii. Mercenarii. Sclavii

2009-05-20T11:44:00.000-07:00

20-may-2009

english version here:

In articolul precedent am facut o analiza sumara a psihicului specific omului civilizat cu urmele pe care societatea civilizata le-a lasat de-a lungul secolelor. In ce masura omul primitiv supravietuieste in cel contemporan sau copilul in adult ne-a aratat destul de clar Haeckel si apoi Freud. Eu as vrea sa acopar o veriga lipsa intre aceste doua perioade, cea a omului clasic care supravietuieste in cel contemporan. Odata ce vom face aceasta legatura anumite aspecte ale societatii contemporane vor fi ceva mai bine intelese.

Ei bine, intre copilarie si perioada primitiva pe care orice om o are incorporata in sufletul sau exista perioada clasica. Cand ai spus om clasic ai spus cultura clasica si colonialism, adica sclav si stapan. O astfel de relatie supravietuieste in societatea contemporana in aceeasi masura in care primitivul o face in insusi omul contemporan. Separatia ermetica intre sclav si stapan specifica epocii clasice exista si in societatea contemporana insa realitatea unui astfel de ermetism este puternic cosmetizata in asa fel incat sa nu fie observabila. Cultura (oficiala) a facut o asemenea distinctie intre sclavul antic si muncitorul contemporan incat cele doua notiuni par total diferite. De fapt ele sunt aproape identice. Diferenta este aceea ca armele cu care sclavul secolelor trecute era amenintat pentru a i se subtiliza munca au fost inlocuite de manipulare si minciuni gogonate. Abia cand aceste noi „arme” se dovedesc a fi ineficiente se poate face o „regresie” la „convingerea” sclavilor cu forta armelor ca trebuie sa se supuna.

Evident ca sclavul clasic a disparut in general si abia traficantii de forta de munca mai abuzeaza de aceasta forma clasica de sclavie. Insa daca sclavii moderni au alt regim asta nu insemna nici pe departe ca ar fi disparut ci doar ca s-a modificat. Schimbarea in cauza este doar una formala de multe ori.

Sistemul social actual a modificat in asemenea masura perceptia cumuna a acestor realitati ale civilizatiei incat un extraterestru care s-ar uita o zi la TV si ar consulta manualele scolare ar fi ferm convins ca cele doua clase sociale au disparut pur si simplu asa cum au disparut marile pandemii ale trecutului ca holera si ciuma. Acest lucru s-a intamplat dupa experienta crestinismului originar care a condamnat sclavagismul greco-roman si dupa reactiile mai mult sau mai putin duplicitare ale umanismului traditional. Insa ca reactie la o astfel de revolta a spiritului uman in fata sclaviei civilizatia a pus in miscare un urias sistem de propaganda care sa dea sistemului mizerabil un aspect placut, cosmetizat. Cauzele pentru o astfel de strategie sunt 2:

Aparitia si dezvoltarea tehnologiei a facut ca muncile facute de sclavul clasic in antichitate si chiar ulterior sa fie astazi facute de masini.
Revolta sclavilor. Riscul eroului militar care ameninta sclavul cu armele lui de a pieri pe limba lui ucis de revolta si razbunarea sclavului s-a vazut cel mai bine la Revolutia Franceza.

Tehnologia si experienta revoltei sclavilor a facut ca sistemul sa caute alte forme de parazitare a acestora. Acesta a oferit satisfactii in plus vechiului sclav de genul abolirii cu surle si trambite a vechii sclavii, libertatea de casatorie de expresie etc. In schimbul acestor libertati sistemul a creat o uriasa masina propagandistica ce ii creeaza iluzia ca e liber. In final realitatea parazitarii contemporane a sclavilor este identica cu cea din lumea antica iar casta aristocratoida nu contribuie la imbunatatirea vietii comunitatii ci doar la infrumusetarea ei insasi folosindu-se de comunitate pentru a o sustine. Iar libertatile oferite de sistemul social contemporan se platesc mai nou cu mutilarea sufletului atins de propaganda.

Pentru a explica ceva mai bine sistemul social modern voi folosi in continuare modelul vechilor armate din care de fapt a provenit statul contemporan si carora le-a mostenit naravul. Vechea formula a societatii spartane exista in grade diferite in orice societate „dezvoltata” de astazi. Exista sclavii care produc bunuri, exista razboinici mercenari care ii ameninta sa le cedeze bunurile si, nu in rand, exista cyborgii, clasa aristocratoida care efectiv beneficiaza cel mai tare de pe urma acestei situatii si este „scopul” celorlalte doua clase. Relatia dintre aceste clase este efectiv aceeasi ca aceea intre jefuitor si victima sa. Repetarea in timp a acestei „simbioze” si sustinerea sa prin educatie fac ca sistemul sa devina efectiv unul mafiot pur si simplu cu principiile de functionare ale mafiei asa cum se cunosc. Mai multe detalii aici.

Despre sclavi si stapani am mai vorbit pe acest blog si oricum se cam stie ce sunt. De aceea in continuare o sa fac o analiza asupra mercenarilor. La origine mercenarii sunt pur si simplu acei oameni care au observat ca e mai usor sa ii ameninti pe altii cu armele sa iti cedeze munca si produsele lor decat sa o-le faci tu insuti. In sistemul social contemporan mercenarii sunt acei sclavi care potential sunt nemultumiti de conditia lor si ameninta sa se revolte. O astfel de situatie este destul de „neconstructiva” pentru autoritati/stapani deoarece nu ar mai avea ce sa paraziteze sau ar avea de pierdut din „populatia” de sclavi. Intr-o potentiala revolta a sclavilor fie acestia se elibereaza fie sunt decimati cu forta armelor ceea ce inseamna „pierderi grele” de utile vieti omenesti din partea sclavilor si de inestimabile vieti omenesti din partea lorzilor. Sistemul social si-a dezvoltat abilitatea de a-i descoperi pe astfel de capi ai revoltei oferindu-le posturi diferite in stat si calmandu-i. Iar sclavia nu se mai face cu amenintarea concreta ci cu amenintarea echivoca in asa fel incat o revolta sa se opreasca inainte de a incepe efectiv. De aceea in locul mercenarilor clasici care manuiesc armele ucigatoare mai nou au aparut mercenarii care manuiesc armele manipularii si convingerii.

In orice caz, incepand de la armatele clasice si ajungand pana la statul contemporan, mercenarii sunt pe jumatate sclavi pe jumatate stapani. Ei sunt acei sclavi pe care stapanii adevarati ii racoleaza pentru a-i controla pe sclavii productivi. La fel ca in trecut si astazi ei sunt carnea de tun pentru cucerirea si subjugarea comunitatilor diferite pentru a le parazita. Ei sunt sclavii fata de angajatorii lor si stapani fata de sclavii pe care ii supravegheaza. De fapt acesta este rolul lor direct – sa supravegheze sclavii cei mai de jos.

Statul este un urias si diabolic aparat de extragere si prelucrare in siguranta a produsului muncii sclavilor. Nu exista separatie a puterilor in stat pentru echilibrare democratica ci doar impartire a sarcinilor, o co-laborare astfel incat eficienta sa fie maxima iar sclavul sa fie stors cat mai profitabil. Acesta e principalul criteriu al existentei mercenarilor. De aici se intelege in ce masura cei care participa la o astfel de mascarada isi pot modela credintele, conceptiile si mentalitatea in functie de sistemul ce il slujesc. Cei care activeaza in aceste institutii sunt insisi mercenarii.

Ju$titia, politia, armata, scoala, guvernul si parlamentul sunt similare cavaleriei, infanteriei, avangardei si a altor parti specifice vechilor armate. Armatele moderne de mercenari nu mai ucid rapid cu armele albe sau de foc ci in timp cu picatura chinezeasca a dezmembrarii constiintei. Ca orice armata nici aceste institutii nu pot trai decat prin jefuirea comunitatilor dupa cum se poate vedea de aici. Dincolo de aspectul cosmetizat si frumos ornat al statului de drept care cica ar fi o dezbatere libera si democratica a punctelor de vedere, o echilibrare armonica a fortelor se ascunde interesul de parazitare a muncii sclavului. „Dezbaterea publica” pe care asanumita societate deschisa o foloseste astazi in scop propagandistic este de fapt o apriga negociere a prazii constituite de statutul de sclav.

Aici trebuie clar facuta diferenta intre relatia sclav-stapan si impartirea sarcinilor intr-o activitate comunitara de genul vanatorii unde fiecare membru al comunitatii are rolul lui acceptat si asumat. Natura are o intelepciunea nativa. Chiar daca membrii alfa ii alunga uneori pe ceilalti de langa prada toti membrii care au participat la vanatoare fac parte din acelasi registru, au participat la vanatoare si mai fura cate ceva din les. In societatea umana abia mercenarii mai primesc ceva firimituri. Societatea civilizata e scindata. Stapanul se afla in alt registru social, etic si existential. El e inconjurat de garduri amenintatoare si de mercenari inarmati si lipsit de zambet pe buze.

Sclavul civilizatiei clasice si contemporane este exclus de la aceasta „vanatoare” pentru ca el este de fapt cel vanat. Asemenea animalului haituit de pradatori sclavul este haituit din frageda pruncie mai intai in scoala apoi la fiecare secunda din viata lui. Cu un nesat aproape patologic stapanii ajutati de mercenarii isi modeleaza sistematic prin statistica, manipulare si "indreptari etice" viitorii spalatori de WC-uri, maturatori de strada, spalatori de lenjerie etc.

Puterea de a te salva si a te elibera de sub jugul manipularii consta in puterea de a uita tot ceea ce sistemul te invata inca din clipa in care te-ai nascut incepand de la familie continuand cu scoala si terminand cu jobul. Unii reusesc sa scape din registrul sclaviei si sa devina mercenari. Putini sunt insa care pot scapa efectiv de mentalitatea mercenarului in care cumva supravietuieste si cea a sclavului. Dar sistemul isi poate permite o astfel de marja de eroare.

In urmatorul articol voi descrie in fapte concrete aceasta realitate generala a societatii contemporane.

The real collective unconscious. Reply to Jungian theoretical bluff

2009-04-16T05:34:00.000-07:00

16-04-2009

In romaneste aici:

This entry is linked to some still to come with the main purpose of explaining first of all the Becali getting to jail and some press favorable articles about Atanasie Stanculescu (the convicted general for the army crimes against people in 1989 events). These two issues are specific to Romanian public life but analyzing them will help understand some features about contemporary global state. They seem totally different but at the closer look we will see that are very close related one another. But I will make this analyze in a future entry. For now I will make a deeper and more general analyze of social system.

In a metasocial approach the state works just like Unconscious that Freud described. Beyond the mincing and „spiritual” statements the state hides very practical, material and concrete intentions just like Unconscious does. The individual classical neurotic Unconscious that Freud described and the state Unconscious could not be separated because they both relate to the same system – the human being.

The first structure theory of human psychic system that Freud proposed (the so-called „first topography”) has many dynamic-explanatory and definition lacunas. Freud was aware of some of them and that is why he finally launched „the second topography”. But this „First Topography” is still very useful for introduction and description. Everybody understands something about the basics of psychical system even if „the first topography” is still a metaphor. I am not going to get into details here – that is not the purposes of this text – but if somebody wants to find out about it than can check the ”dynamics of abyssal psychology” I wrote. That characteristic of better communication makes me use Freud s „First Topography” in this text for a general description of some features of social system. I am sure that that couple of concepts form „First Topography” would not be enough for a detailed analyze of social system but it is ideal for the text here.

The psychic from „First Topography” is defined as an ensemble of conscious and unconscious forces that struggle for influence of behavior, thinking and feelings. The Unconscious of slave that became bourgeois and who develops neurosis as Freud described is only a part of human kind collective Unconscious; the psychopathological part. The slave’s unconscious and the master’s have the same principle but works differently and have different results.

The development and evolution of Psychopathological Unconscious described by Freud is closely related with the crude reality of slave-master hermetical society and the robbery that take place between these two big social actors. The inequity of such ugly situation relays not only in the robbery itself that flagrantly contradicts the fundamental basis of human ethical spirit but it also has the ambition that this robbery should be forgotten by omission or by metaphisicsing it into heavens with the classical culture. At the Romanian countryside – there where the medieval costumes and mentalities can be seen easier – some parents threaten their children if crying with more punishment after beating them. That is the way that classical culture deals with their slaves: after stealing their products with no shame and regrets the classical state douse not forget to come at the end with the last threaten that that kind of wild parents does to their child: „quite!”

The classical culture fully represents this cynical short-sightedness required by authorities. Despites of that the classical culture is oversaturated by angels, elegant manners , white immaculate gloves or The Good (master) that defeat The Evil (the slave). The classical culture is just like a mafia guy that smoothly takes away the dirt on his coat after a crime. All these affectations are meant to cynically hide this big as Pacific Ocean truth that nobody sees it any more after dealing with classical culture.

The acceptance and assume of such reality as a social class is similar to abreaction of neurosis symptom inside individual. The Resistance of social system is stronger than its victim – the neurotic person. When the aristoctraoid mentalities positioned against psychoanalytical theories it was mainly because of two reasons:

Inside of aristocratoid mentality there is just none of those elements found in neurotical Unconscious described by Freud because that mentality has no transgenerational social frustrations of slaves. On the contrary is the aristocratoid mentality that builds its wealth and its cynical world detachment over the slave mentality. That aristocratoid mentality produces such pain to neurotics and to the majority of the mental disordered people.
The existence of an Unconscious that does different and contradictory things to what actually says might raise questions about the way society actually works beyond nice statements.

For now it is as clear as the daylight that the Unconscious scandal is larger than so-called “Ego defense mechanisms” described by Freud. The Unconscious scandal was and still is today a matter of political battle because the democratically painted aristocrats desperately fight for the historical social favors that might slip away with contemporary slaves waking up. The psychoanalysis stroke the foundation of classical culture. For a couple of terms that he invented in psychology and for applying to psychology some old theories – maybe nicer and more precisely told by their authors – Jung gained the “prophet” degree and social system invested with culture in such a figure in order to take Freud’s Unconscious down.*

When one actually sees that the psychic comes from deeper than childhood as Jung saw, when one sees its cultural specificity and heredity but still remain blind to the explanation of psychic genealogy as social historic tensions than that is not humanism but hypocrisy. What Jung did is very similar to what the majority of humanists did: a hermetic humanism. That is a false humanism. There is no cynical humanism but a superficial and false one.

It is clear that even Freud did not dig enough here. That is because mainly Freud was a physician and tended to see only medical part of it but loosing the holistic view and staying under a structuralist cartesianism instead of placing the individual deep into society where s/he belongs. Freud was unable to see the genesis of mental disorder outside of family, was unable to extrapolate the familial microsociety into metasocial level and that is why he understood the psychopathology under this limited field of analysis. By doing so Freud only mended in a medical terms some traditional theories that stated the infantile origin of mental disorder.

The two sided of Collective Unconscious represents the mutilation that the double side measurements civilization – as the classical and contemporary civilizations are – caused to humanity: the slaves and the masters. There is no other such splitting creature on Earth as human being is. If nature wants by its very base to combine such separated parts of worlds it is the civilization that keeps separating them systematically. There is no such a thing even in the mechanical inorganic nature. Even the sexes that nature created different one from another still they keep attracting and continuously communicate each other for sharing the information, requirements and tasks. On the contrary, the classical and contemporary state hates this natural reality and struggle as a cancerous disease to keep up this unnatural separation between slaves and masters.

In the next entry I will describe the cultural mercenaries that make this entire nightmare possible, those that are paid by real masters to supervise the slaves, to convince them to work for masters and to clean up the foot-marks and to create such of image strategies that the fine thieves to be perceived as angels.
*The paroxysm of such hypocrisy was the fact that as high society world culture invested a lot in theories that opposite psychoanalysis in the same time Edward Barnays was working the contemporary mind control and collective manipulation monstrous machinery using such theories first stated by psychoanalysis.

Ce este de fapt inconstientul colectiv. Replica la cacialmaua teoretica propusa de Jung

2009-04-16T05:28:00.000-07:00

16-04-2009

english version here:

Acest articol este legat de inca cateva la finalul carora imi doresc sa explic mai intai arestarea lui Becali iar apoi articolele din presa favorabile la adresa lui Atanasie Stanculescu (generalul condamnat pentru crimele armatei impotriva cetatenilor in evenimentele din 1989) . Cele doua evenimente par total diferite insa ele sunt mult mai legate unul de altul decat pare la prima vedere. Dar despre analiza lor directa ma voi ocupa intr-unul dintre articolele viitoare. Deocmdata voi face o analiza ceva mai profunda si mai generala a sistemului social.

Statul functioneaza la nivel metasocial exact ca Inconstientul descris de Freud care, sub declaratii fandosite si „spirituale” ascunde intentii dintre cele mai concrete si mai practice. Inconstientul clasic individual nevroticoid descris de Freud si cel metasocial al claselor sociale nu pot fi doua lucruri diferite deoarece ambele sunt manifestari ale aceluiasi sistem- omul.

Prima teoretizare in structuri a psihicului omenesc (topica) propusa de Freud are multe lacune dinamic-explicative si de definire – drept pentru care el a lansat pana la urma cea de-a doua topica. Insa aceasta „prima topica” e foarte buna la nivel pur descriptiv, introductiv. Toata lumea intelege ceva din esenta functionarii psihicului chiar daca ea e mai mult o metafora. Nu intru in detalii aici, am facut-o in ”Dinamica psihologiei abisale”. Din acest motiv am sa folosesc si eu prima topica in acest articol menit sa descrie cititorilor ceva particular din sistemul psihicului. Recunosc ca ea e insuficienta pentru o analiza amanuntita a sistemului social insa pentru acest articol ea e ideala.

Psihicul dupa prima topica este un ansamblu de forte constiente si inconstiente care se lupta pentru influenta in comportament, gandire si sentimente. Inconstientul scalvului imburghezit cel dezvoltator de nevroza asa cum l-a descris Freud este doar o parte din Inconstientul umanitatii respectiv partea sa (psiho)patologica. Desi are aceleasi principii, Inconstientul stapanilor functioneaza cu totul altfel decat cel al sclavilor. Aparitia Inconstientului psihopatoid descris de el este dat de stricta realitate a scindarii sociale sclav-stapan si a jafului la care primul este supus de catre al doilea. Mizeria unei astfel de situatii este data nu doar de jaful in sine care contrazice legea fundamentala a spiritului etic uman ci si pretentia ca acest jaf sa fie uitat fie prin omisiune fie prin metafizicarea lui, prin ridicarea in slavi a sa pe care sistemul, cultura clasica o face. La tara – acolo unde mentalitatea medievala se poate vedea mai bine – unii parinti isi ameninta copiii ca vor primi si mai multa bataie daca plang dupa ce au primit prima portie de pedeapsa corporala. Cam asa face si cultura clasica: dupa ce ii fura sclavului cu dezinvoltura produsele statul calsic nu uita sa adauge in final: „ai tacut?”

Cultura clasica reprezinta pe deplin acest miopism cinic pe care sistemul il implica. Cultura clasica este plina de ingeri, de maniere elegante, de manusi, de binele (stapanul) care invinge raul (sclavul). Cultura clasica seamana cu gesturile unui mafiot care isi sterge tacticos praful de pe haina dupa ce a executat o amenintare pentru plata taxei de protectie. Toate aceste pretiozitati sunt menite sa ascunda in mod cinic acest adevar mare cat Oceanul Pacific dar pe care aproape ca nu-l mai vede nimeni. Acesta este inconstientul aristocratoid diferit de cel nevroticoid al sclavului.

Recunoasterea si asumarea unei astfel de realitati la nivel de clasa este similara cu abreactia simptomului nevrotic la nivel individual. Rezistenta sistemului este mult mai puternica decat a victimei sale – nevroticul. Atunci cand partea aristocratoida a lumii s-a manifestat impotriva teoriilor psihanalitice, ea o facea din doua motive:

Pur si simplu in mentalitatea lor aristocratoida nu exista sau exista doar intr-o foarte mica masura realitatile nevropatice descrise de Freud deoarece stilul ei de viata nu are frustrarile transgenealogice ale acestora. Dimpotriva mentalitatea aristocratoida chiar isi cladeste bunastarea si „detasarea” cinica fata de lume pe stilul de viata al sclavului. Tocmai ea este aceea care le provoaca nevroticilor si majoritatii psihopatilor asemenea suferinta.
Existenta unui Inconstient care una spune si alta face ar fi putut pune semne de intrebare asupra modului in care functioneaza societatea dincolo de declaratiile inocente ale autoritatilor.

In acest moment pentru mine e clar ca lumina zilei ca scandalul Inconstientului depasit cu mult granitele unui „mecanism de aparare al Eului” asa cum l-a descris Freud. Scandalul Inconstientului a fost si inca este o batalie politica unde aristocratii vopsiti s-au vazuti in postura disperata de a pierde favorurile sociale istorice ca urmare a colapsarii culturii clasice produsa de psihanaliza. Pentru cativa termeni introdusi in vocabularul de specialitate si pentru vopsirea psihologica a unor teorii exprimate poate mai frumos si poate chiar mai clar de alti ganditori din trecut Jung a primit titlul onorific de „profet” iar sistemul a investit profund in el. *

Atunci cand vezi ca psihicul vine de dincolo de copilarie asa cum a vazut Jung, atunci cand vezi ereditatea si specificitatea culturala a psihicului dar ramai in continuare imun la tensiunile sociale in explicarea genealogiei psihicului trebuie ca esti un ipocrit nu umanist. Ce a facut Jung este cam ceea ce a facut majoritatea umanistilor: un ermetic umanism. Adica un fals umanism. Nu exista un umanism cinic ci doar un fals sau superficial umanism.

Evident ca nici Freud n-a sapat prea mult aici. Ca medic Freud a fost inclinat sa o vada doar pe aceasta si sa ramana prizonierului unui cartezianism structuralist in loc sa bage individul in societate acolo unde ii este locul. Freud nu a putut intelege geneza tulburarii psihice in afara familiei, nu a putut extinde microsocialul familial la metasocial si astfel a preferat sa inteleaga psihopatologia relativ doar la acest domeniu restrans. Facand astfel el a recurs practic la carpirea medicalista a niste teorii traditionale despre originea infantila a tulburarii psihice.

Dublul Inconstient Colectiv reprezinta mutilarea pe care civilizatia jumatatilor de masura asa cum este cea clasica si contemporana a produs-o umanitatii: sclavii si stapanii. Nu exista pe nicaieri vreo specie cunoscuta impartita in doua astfel de entitati. Natura vrea sa le amestece asa cum face ea de obicei iar civilizatia si cultura le blocheaza sistematic. Nici macar in natura la nivel de mecanica bruta un sistem izolat nu exista. In ce masura sexele pe care natura le-a creat pentru o cat mai eficienta perpetuare a speciei se reunesc si se atrag continuu, comunica unul cu altul si isi impart unul altuia informatiile, cerintele si sarcinile. Dimpotriva, statul clasic si contemporan este acea excrescenta cancerigena a civilizatiei menite sa izoleze stapanii de sclavi .

In urmatorul articol voi analiza mercenarii culturali, despre cei care sunt platiti de stapani sa supravegheze sclavii, sa ii convinga sa munceasca pentru stapani si sa stearga urmele jafului, sa creeze astfel de strategii de imagine incat hotii sa fie prezentati istoriei drept ingeri.

*Ipocrizia maxima a sistemului consta in faptul ca in timp ce „lumea fina” investea substantial in teorii opuse psihanalizei in acelasi timp un Edward Barnays crea monstruoasa masinarie contemporana de manipulare si control al mintii colective cu ajutorul teoriilor pe care de fapt la nivel declarativ ea le combatea.

Primitivismul in civilizatia contemporana

2009-02-22T01:18:00.000-08:00

22-02-2009

english version here:

Parazitarea primitivismului din interiorul spatiului geografic al societatii civilizate

Civilizatia primitiva este o civilizatie a cuceririi naturii cu resursele ei insa incapabila de stapanire. Abia civilizatia clasica este o cultura a cuceririi omului, a inrobirii lui. Civilizatia„dezvoltata” asa cum exista de cateva secole in lumea occidentala este o civilizatie a imperativului categoric, a recunoasterii omului ca valoare suprema si a actiunii conform acestui principiu.

Paradoxul societatii (post)industriale de astazi ramane acela ca imperativul categoric formulat fara echivoc de catre Kant nu poate fi aplicat in mod universal. Statutul inestimabil al omului nu poate fi aplicat nici macar omului occidental nemaifiind vorba de cel oriental care este mult sub acest statut de evaluare.

Societatea contemporana „dezvoltata” la fel ca si cea clasica si medievala are nevoie de o civilizatie primitiva pe care sa o poata parazita. Fie ca aceasta societate primitiva e o enclava (incorporata) in civilizatia moderna, fie ca e chiar o comunitate exterioara, ea are nevoie de servitori naivi care sunt reprezentanti ai civilizatiei primitive. Dupa cum regina orbetelui de Africa face cu muncitoarele sale secretand substante pentru a nu li se dezvolta organele genitale la fel face si civilizatia „morala” cu supusii sai impiedicandu-i sa se ridice din starea de primitivism. Cred ca pentru un om inteligent si neafectat de interese personale in aceasta directie e clar ca societatea dezvoltata nu poate supravietui fara colonialism, fara exploatarea si uneori chiar suprimarea vietii primitive si salbatice. Modul de lucru e urmatorul: „Ia dati-ne noua voi paganilor aurul si bunurile voastre caci noi suntem copiii lui Dumnezeu; daca refuzati atunci vom veni cu armatele peste voi”. Colonialismul, cel atat de deplans astazi de ipocrita cultura contemporana este de fapt motorul civilizatiei. Aparatul de propaganda si manipulare este elementul de noutate al colonialismului capitalist fata de cel clasic. Numai dupa ce acestea esueaza se poate trece la represalii armate sub diferite pretexte. In cazul comunitatilor externe se foloseste razboiul direct clasic pentru a obtine robia acestora. Pentru primitivismul incorporat astfel de represalii sunt realizate cu ajutorul Ju$titiei. In trecut pentru realizarea acestui plan se folosea paganismul ca scuza, mai nou se foloseste „axa raului” si „terorismul” in general. Acestea sunt instrumente perfecte pentru societatea colonialista pentru a pastra restul lumii in intuneric.

O civilizatie absolut morala in sensul formulat de Kant este posibila doar in momentul in care viata omului este protejata de factorii externi. Civilizatia morala incepe din momentul in care toata lumea are un adapost normal si suficienta hrana incat sa nu moara de foame. Daca aceste conditii minime nu sunt indeplinite atunci civilizatia este doar una rudimentara, clasica, cel mult industriala, dar nu morala si dreapta asa cum ea pretinde. Omul nu poate fi valoare suprema atata timp cat poate sa moara de foame sau frig. Acestea sunt realitati specifice culturii primitive/clasice. Intr-o astfel de societate numai anumiti oameni au valoare inestimabila. Restul sunt sclavii. Rolul lor e sa serveasca. Armatele clasice sau armatele vopsite politienesc asa cum apar in statul mai mult sau mai putin politienesc modern au acest rol de a pazi sclavii sa isi faca bine treaba.

Diferenta dintre sclavi si stapanii sau supraveghetorii de sclavi este aceea ca primii sunt amanuntit controlati, stresati si trasi la raspundere pentru activitatea lor in timp ce ceilalti lucreaza in spatele usilor inchise ca niste zei autoproclamati. Cu cat mai usoara si mai parazitara e activitatea celorlalti cu atat mai stresanta si mai grea a activitatea sclavilor care trebuie sa le acopere si lor lipsa de eficienta si de implicare constructiva in viata comunitatii. Printre cele mai stresante munci sunt acelea de supraveghere ale diferitelor masini si instalatii. Printre cele mai grele sub aspectul efortului fizic se afla cele din agricultura sau constructii. Stresul sau hiperstenia specifice acestor ocupatii se vor transforma mai devreme sau mai tarziu de-a lungul generatiilor in depresie, tendinte paranoide sau alte tulburari psihice. Acestea la randul lor se transforma in tulburari somatoforme sau chiar in boli ale organismului. Practic starea de boala in care se afla o buna parte a omenirii datorita starii de sclavie este acel atentat la adresa vietii lor si la adresa imperativului categoric cu evaluarea vietii umane la nivel suprem. Iata ca intarirea unei parti a umanitatii se face cu pretul slabirii alteia. Situatia pare un cerc vicios; pentru a pune imperativul categoric in actiune si a acorda valoare inestimabila unei parti din comunitate trebuie sacrificata o alta parte cea a sclavilor. Viata sclavului nu mai e scop in sine ci scop pentru stapan. Sclavul raspunde prompt nevoilor si dispozitiei sale, adica e un fel de obiect/fiinta utilitara al carui scop este servirea celorlalti.

Parazitarea primitivismului din afara spatiului geografic al societatii civilizate

S-ar putea aici aduce contraargumentul vietii simple si usoare pe care omul occidental o are astazi. E un lucru evident faptul ca viata lui este mult mai usoara fata de cea a predecesorilor sai, ca exista multe sarbatori si petreceri, ca joburile stresante au ajuns destul de rare etc. Exista unele tari vest-europene unde cersetorii sunt luati de pe strada si dusi in adaposturi unde primesc un pat normal si mancare. Dar totusi un astfel de efort comunitar atarna greu in spatele celorlalti membri. Stresul vietii de zi cu zi este multiplicat de sustinerea celor care nu pot sau nu vor sa munceasca si sa contribuie la bugetul comunitar. Pentru ca o anumita parte din cetatenii societatii contemporane sa atinga un acest statut este nevoie ca restul lumii sa le usureze viata cu munca lor. Din pacate sclavii se aleg acum din afara unor astfel de state si asta e pretul “libertatii moderne”.

Mirajul unei vieti occidentale a aprins si inca continua sa aprinda imaginatia si ravna restului lumii si emigratia este consecinta acestui fenomen. Insa un astfel de stil de viata este usurat tocmai datorita acestui tip de invidie. Adica inclusiv in lumea civilizata emigrantii fac cele mai ingrate joburi. Apoi o buna parte din munca grea a occidentalului s-a transferat astazi in tarile extrem orientale asa cum e India sau China. Vechilor sclavi occidentali li s-a deschis drumul catre lenevie sau creativitate fiind trimisi acasa din fabricile care s-au mutat in aceste tari contra unui ajutor de somaj care echivaleaza cu salariu de lux in alte parti ale lumii. Acesti oameni accepta sa lucreze in conditii de secol 17-18, cu foarte putine drepturi si de aceea ei sunt mana cereasca pentru diferitele corporatii.

Am spus-o in lucrarea mea „Starpirea vampirilor” si reiau ideea. In momentul in care o companie occidentala patrunde intr-o comunitate clasica sau primitiva se intampla un lucru devastator pentru comunitate. O parte din cetateni, cei angajati de companie sunt artificial modernizati, artificial ridicati din stilul de viata primitiv sau clasic si adusi in mijlocul problemelor vietii contemporane pentru care cei mai multi nu au afinitati adaptative. La prima vedere o astfel de companie pare a fi raiul de pe pamant aducand prosperitatea si eradicand saracia acelei comunitati. Insa lucrurile stau altfel la o privire mai atenta. Chiar daca traiau la limita subzistentei totusi acei oameni primitivi nu erau saraci. Saracia si problemele ei este specifica societatii dezvoltate si nu celei primitive. Starea de minima subzistenta este starea naturala a omului primitiv cu mecanismele sale interne de autoreglare si integrare in mediul salbatic. Sentimentul si realitatea saraciei vin abia cu minciunile „societatii dezvoltate”. Primitivul accepta fericit ca un copil neexperimentat o astfel de terifianta transmutare din starea de primitiv in cea de modern la fel cum un copil accepta invoiala de a sari de la fereastra peste 5 minute in schimbul unei bomboane. Ca si copilul si primitivul va plati scump pentru o astfel de naivitate. Dezradacinarea este una dintre teribilele consecinte a acestei alegeri. Sa urmam firul logic al unei astfel de realitati. Sa ne imaginam ca in urma unei astfel de intruziuni corporatiste bastinasii vor contacta diferite boli. Evident ca angajatii vor fi trimisi in strainatate pentru tratament sau se va aduce un doctor in zona. Insa ce vor face cei care nu sunt angajati? Iata un prim moment al scindarii comunitatii primitive in urma intruziunii corporatiste. Insa cel mai clar semn al acestei scindari sociale este dat de tensiunile care se acumuleaza intre angajatii companiei care se adapteaza treptat la stilul de viata occidental si cei neangajati care devin din oameni normali ai societatii primitive niste saraci ai societatii moderne artificial implementate in aceste zone. Acestia ajung sa ii invidieze si sa ii urasca pe adaptati si isi pun toata energia in a le lua locul. Pentru asta accepta salarii mai mici si astfel drepturile naturale ale muncitorului occidentalizat se risipesc pentru toti. Cei angajati simt aceasta „amenintare” la adresa lor de catre cei ce distrug piata salariilor. Invidia somerilor fata de cei angajati si dispretul angajatilor fata de someri sunt ingredientele unei societati scindate. Iata terenul propice pentru tulburarile sociale! Iata ce inseamna neocolonialismul corporatist! Iata ce simplu se pot transforma niste oameni primitivi dar liberi din societatea primitiva in niste oameni primitivi dar sclavi in societatea dezvoltata.

Se poate spune astfel ca greutatea civilizatiei occidentale a inceput sa atarne pe omul oriental de rand invidios si pofticios la bunastarea occidentala. Iata ca problema nu s-a rezolvat! Gunoiul se arunca ceva mai departe de lumea occidentala. Insa lumea se globalizeaza, ea se transforma incet dar sigur intr-un sat planetar asa ca nu va dura mult pana cand acest gunoi va incepe sa miroasa si in cealalta parte a lumii. Civilizatia occidentala trebuie sa se gandeasca de pe acum ce e de facut pentru ca viitorii teroristi se vor alege din India si China.

Instrumentele avansate ale statului „dezvoltat” modern de paraztitare a culturii primitive

Tarile occidentale nu mai au stat politienesc foarte vizibil insa, nici o problema, o tara ca si China catre care s-a mutat sclavia pot rezolva problema pentru ca acolo statul politienesc functioneaza. Bunastarea occidentala de astazi se face in buna masura cu ajutorul statelor politienesti care pazesc sclavii din afara Occidentului. La fel s-a rezolvat si problema torturii interzisa pe teritoriul SUA dar permisa in diverse avioane care se plimba prin lume de placere... Oricum ar fi, armata si statul politienesc sau semipolitienesc sunt carpelile provizorii care pot tine provizoriu societatea actuala „dezvoltata” in stare de functionare. Omul occidental n-a scapat nici el de acestea ci doar sunt ceva mai blande cu el. Ju$titia este cel mai clar exemplu al acestei prezente autoritariste chiar daca de cele multe ori in tarile "dezvoltate" ea este folositoare omului de rand in ceea ce priveste protectia in fata abuzurilor altora. Insa ca orice sistem mafiot Ju$titia nu mai protejeaza omul de rand in fata abuzurilor sistemului care ii fura (sistematic) din venituri. Asta arata de fapt adevaratele resorturi ale ei. De fapt Ju$titia nu doreste sa il apere pe omul de rand de cel ce i-a adus o paguba ci vrea ca si acela sa fie "reabilitat", sa produca si el ceva si sa plateasca si el taxe neofeudalilor. In felul acesta bugetul pentru banchetele lor va fi mai mare.

Omul de rand este abil manipulat sa plateasca serviciile politicienilor si a altor urmasi ai vechilor feudali fara chiar sa inteleaga acest lucru. El este obligat sa le cumpere (de)serviciile si nu are nici o alternativa sa nu o faca. Ju$titia si restul de resurse ale statului politienesc este pur si simplu nemiloasa cu cei care incearca sa se sustraga. Ju$titia nu te apara decat ocazional de furturile altora ca tine insa are grija sa fi aspru pedepsit daca nu accepti zambind ca "oficialii" sa te fure pe tine. Toate aceastea se fac cu o abilitate si o manipulare desavarsita. Sistemul iti subtilizeaza munca si produsele exact cand iti iei un job. Putini din cei ce nu isi platesc taxele la stat sunt aruncati direct in inchisoare. Numai ca nu poti sa iti gasesti un job legal fara ca taxa de protectie catre sistem (mafiot) sa nu fie inclusa. De fapt taxa nu o plateste angajatul direct ci angajatorul sau prin oferta de lucru contra salariu. Abia atunci cand angajatorul refuza sa plateasca la randul lui mai sus pe scara sistemului aceasta taxa se poate vorbi de o aruncare a acestuia in inchisoare. Dar cine e atat de fraier sa accepte ca el sa mearga la inchisoare in loc sa trimita povara parazitilor social in carca angajatului si astfel sa isi recupereze pierderile! In felul acesta munca angajatului este mult mai grea decat ar trebui sa fie deoarece pe langa schimbul corect cu angajatorul mai intra si mana nesatula a politicianului pe care el trebuie sa o suporte cu munca sa. Din pacate astfel de taxe de protectie nu se mai intorc niciodata catre comunitate ci sunt irosite dincolo de portalurile… pardon… usile inchise dupa care se scund politicienii. Sistemul mafiot iti ia din salariu taxele de protectie fara ca macar sa stii. Contractul de munca angajat-angajator care e din start corupt de aceasta situatie a sistemului parazitar. Faptul ca angajatul presteaza o munca mai grea pentru retributia pe care o primeste inseamna o excludere automata a acestuia in trecutul civilizatiei, un refuz al sistemului de a-i aproba contemporaneitatea.

Nu ai de ales decat sa refuzi sa muncesti. Cel care o face insa este exilat la marginea societatii si exclus din civilizatie. In felul acesta sistemul iti interzice un lucru elementar si anume schimbul de produse cu colegii tai de comunitate. Nu poti sa participi la bunastarea omenirii de pe urma mintilor stralucite ale civilizatiei care au creat tehnologia si au usurat viata moderna. Sistemul mafiot modern s-a facut stapan peste toate astea, el da aprobare pentru ca X sa faca parte din umanitate si din minunile sale daca plateste taxa la fel cum regii/principii acceptau sau refuzau casatoriile supusilor in trecut. Ju$titia are grija ca toate astea sa functioneze perfect.

Vechea conceptie asupra justitiei ca reparatie facuta unui abuz este o minciuna gogonata. Hamurabi, regele oriental care a ramas in istorie ca primul utilizat ori a unui cod de legi, le-a facut pentru a explica supusilor mai exact ce vrea de la ei. Cam asta e si in societatea moderna justitia. Diferenta consta in faptul ca in ea se investesc mult mai multe resurse pentru a parea in ochii celor pe care ii napastuieste ca ar fi motorul dupa care societatea functioneaza, ca e menita pentru protejarea celor slabi fata de abuzurile celor puternici. Dar in realitate ea doar a perfectionat aceasta veche si primitiva indeletnicire a celor puternici de a-i papa pe cei slabi. Asanumitii (de catre cultura oficiala) sofisti au vazut faptul ca legile sunt ca niste fire din plasa de paianjen unde mustele se prind in ele iar animalele mai mari le rup.

Dar sa fie bine inteles; eu nu am o problema cu a recunoaste justitia ca motor al functionarii sociale. Doar ca o consider o barbarie la fel ca si legea junglei. Hotul si infractorul modern pe care justitia chipurile il amendeaza pentru gesturile si actiunile sale ”necivilizate” este la fel de ”indreptatit” pentru ceea ce face la fel cum este si justitia si sistemul pe care il apara sa isi ia partea leului. Diferenta consta in faptul ca infractorul de drept comun foloseste arme albe sau arme de foc de calibru mic, iar justitia vine cu elicoptere, carabine si chiar tancuri. Justitia e mult mai bine dotata cu arme, asta e clar.

Lucrul cel mai interesant este acela ca furtul originar al sistemului in frunte cu politicienii facut sclavilor pare cu totul legitim daca acestia sunt primitivi. Dupa cum legitima pare uciderea animalelor de abator in scopul supravietuirii speciei umane la fel este „serviciul” de guvernare pe care politicienii si restul de paraziti neofeudali li-l ofera pentru a fi „ridicati” la rang de oameni civilizati. Cultura manierelor elegante stie sa anatemizeze foarte eficient brutalitatea primitiva! „Esti prost si orb iar eu iti arat drumul contra sclaviei tale”; asta e „simbioza” sociala a statului „dezvoltat” modern! Mi se pare mie cumva sau crestinii colonialisti faceau acelasi lucru cu paganii acum cateva sute de ani?

Urmarile culturale si psihopatologice ale scindarii sociale din societatea „dezvoltata” moderna

Evident ca sistemul apoi lucreaza in defavoarea ta, pentru a te mentine in starea de robie la fel ca si unii cersetori isi mutileaza copiii pentru a avea mai mare succes la cersit. Daca acesti asanumiti parinti sunt totusi cazuri izolate sistemul face acest lucru cu schilozii sai spiritual in mod regulat. Educatia deschisa, egalitatea de sanse si alte astfel de minciuni gogonate ale sistemului sunt doar strategii de imagine menite sa le mai ridice moralul victimelor societatii si astfel sa le faca mai profitabile.

Din acest motiv cred ca societatea contemporana e mult prea impanzita cu primitivism ca sa fie numita civilizata, morala sau dreapta. Ne-am umplut cu masini, aproape ca nu le mai suportam in jurul nostru si totusi suntem la secole distanta la o viata cu adevarat civilizata si umana in sensul parerii bune despre sine pe care cultura i-a facut-o.

Dintre toate speciile de pe pamant cea umana este de departe cea mai bolnava si cea mai deprimata. Lucrurile urate ale civilizatiei primitive si salbatice se rezolva de la sine deoarece in primul rand sunt create de natura si tot natura le autoregleaza. Primitivismul supravietuitor in societatea capitalista e de mii si mi de ori mai socant decat cel original al naturii. Am vazut cum hienele pot manca de viu prada in savana. A fi mancat de viu pare una dintre cele mai crude morti posibile. Si totusi pana si in acest caz secretiile umorale anesteziaza durerea prazii. Timpul unui astfel de cosmar e de 10-20 minute pana la o zi sau maxim doua. Insa cea mai mare parte a vietii animalului este una armonioasa. Din pacate depresia pe care majoritatea oamenilor societatii „dezvoltate” o resimt este o durere continua care se prelungeste teribil pe zeci si zeci de ani. Abia daca drogurile si un intreg aparat social de distractie mai pot temporar si provizoriu tempera aceasta epidemie depresiva a civilizatiei.

Cam asta e problema societatii actuale bazata pe elementele si actiunile primitive. In timp ce unii lupta pentru viata lor altii traiesc total rupti de realitate. Elitismul lor cartezian este doar un cinic mijloc de sustragere din aceasta realitate. Pentru ei pana si sentimentele de vinovatie sunt spalate de sistem. Urmasi ai vechii aristocratii si a vechilor colonialisti, ei sunt rasfatatii societatii moderne. Spiritul lor corporatist in care se ascunde vechea mentalitate de jefuitori a scapat parca spiritului naturii. Ei au devenit niste cyborgi care se pare ca nu mai pot fi readusi in familia umanitatii, naturii si vietii sub nici o forma. Mizeria pe care au produs-o naturii umane in ultimele secole se resimte astazi ca un cancer in constiinta lumii. Daca aceste creaturi ar fi spuma umanitati nimeni nu ar avea ceva de obiectat fata de statutul lor de vampiri sociali. Dar acesti oameni au uitat sa mai fie oameni, traiesc pentru imagine, traiesc pentru a-si ascunde urmele, traiesc pentru statistica si nu stiu sa traiasca altfel decat prin minciuna, manipulare si, in final furt cu ajutorul instrumentelor sofisticate ale statului.

Cultura contemporana abunda de neincrederea in metanaratiuni si scepticismul fata de toate si tot. Un singur lucru ramane ferm pe pozitie cu titlu de adevar universal valabil: faptul ca exista sclavi si ca trebuie sa ramana sclavi pentru ca altfel omul liber nu ar mai putea fi liber. O da! Nimeni nu pune la indoiala un astfel de adevar. Dar daca cineva vine si spune ca politicianului i se face statuie pentru furtul metasocial pe care il face in timp ce infractorul marunt este bagat la racoare atunci cultura vine si isi face datoria de caine de paza a sistemului. O sa vedeti ca un astfel de lucru este imposibil de recunoscut ca adevarat deoarece gnoseologia a ajuns la concluzi ca nu are o definitie a adevarului. Asta inseamna, dupa ea, ca adevarul s-ar putea sa fie o prejudecata si sa nu existe. Asta inseamna ca adevarul poate sa nu existe deci echivalarea furtului politicienilor cu cel al infractorilor ar fi lipsita de sens. Avansata rau cultura contemporana. Noroc ca nu se preda la clasele primare. Acolo se predau adevarurile universal valabile ca acela de mai sus. E nevoie de un Dumnezeu invizibil in care omul de rand sa creada orbeste si care apoi sa fie proiectat in senior si astfel sa ii cedeze „jertfa” sa in forma de impozit. E nevoie ca primitivul contemporan sa-si proiecteze religia in tot felul de lucruri banale pentru a fi divinizate si astfel sa devina un bun consumator. Mare nevoie are societatea „dezvoltata” de lumea primitiva cu care sa se curete! Deocamdata cam asta e ceea ce pompos se numeste civilizatie.

The primitivism in contemporary society

2009-02-22T01:08:00.000-08:00

22-02-2009

In romaneste aici:

The exploitation of the primitivism placed inside the geographic space of developed society

The primitive society is one of conquest of main nature and its resources but still incapable of mastery. It is the classical civilization who manages to master and enslave the primitive one. Starting from here the modern industrial civilization of nowadays developed of “categorical imperative”, of accepting the supreme value of human being.

But the paradox of (post)industrial society remains the impossibility of applying without equivoque such an ideal to the real world. The inestimable value of human life today is impossible to be accepted as fact even in the western person case and the oriental human being is excluded from this statute from the beginning.

The “developed” modern society as classical society also needs a primitive civilization to parasite, to survive on. This primitive civilization could be incorporated into modern one as an enclave or it could be an outside community. But this kind of civilization is indispensable for “developed” modern society life. In Africa lives a very strange creature: mole rat. The colony is lead by a queen which has a special gland that secretes a substance that annihilates every sexual behavior of other females of community. That is the exact way that “developed” modern society deals with its primitive civilization that relies on. The “developed” modern society culture is meant to prevent the primitive people to develop, to escape this prison of exploitation. Everyone that has not affected its judgment by different personal interests could see that “developed” modern society cannot survive without colonialism, without exploitation or even repression of wild or primitive life. The way id does is simple: “give us your gold and your goods you heathens because we are the children of God; if you refuse that then we will come with our army and destroy you”. The painful colonialism that hypocrite contemporary culture keeps blaming is the engine of modern civilization. The difference between classical and modern colonialism relies only in the huge manipulation and propaganda system that the last one uses. The modern colonialism uses it a lot and only when it fails then turn back to classical one forcing the primitives with armies to give up something. If that primitive community is locate outside of geographic position of the modern one then starting a war against in order to enslave it is the procedure. If that primitive community is locate outside of that then that kind of repression are made with the Ju$tice. In the past the main reason for colonialism was godlessness. Nowadays “the axis of evil” and “global therorism” is used. These are the perfect tools of modern colonialism in order to keep the rest of the world in the dark.

A moral society as Kant imagined is not possible until human life is not fully protected against nature or other people. A moral civilization starts from the point of shelter and enough food to avoid starvation. If these conditions are not satisfied then the society cannot be called otherwise than classical society, at least industrial but never a right and moral society as it claims. Dying of starvation or lack of shelter is a primitive and classical reality. In such society there are only some people that claim for inestimable value of life. The others value is object value. Their “goal” is just serving the others. The classical armies or the modern polices ones as they exist in the more or less authoritarian modern state watch for the slaves to do their job.

The big difference between the slaves and slaves's masters/supervisers is that tge first are stressed, responsible and controlled in detail in their jobs and the others works behind closed doors with small responsibility or no responsibility at all just like self proclamed gods. Their lack of eficiency and finality work for the community must be reclaimed by the slaves work. The most parasitical are their activities the hardest is the slaves's work. Many people have hard pushy work but indispensable for the rest of community. The most stressful jobs are that of supervising devices and installations. The hardest work as regarding physical labor is that from agriculture and making buildings. The stress and hyperstheny of making such jobs will turn sooner or later into paranoid tendencies, depressive disorders or other psychical disorders. These will also turn into somatoform disorders or even real diseases. The human being became the most depressive and ill specie among all the creatures on the earth. Actually the slavery is an attack to the live of the slaves and to the Kant’s “categorical imperative” also. Trying to give absolute value to a part of humanity weaken another part. The situation seems to be a vicious circle; in order to make reality of “categorical imperative” and give inestimable value to a part of society anther part must be sacrificed. The life of the slave is not goal in itself anymore but interest for the master. The slave is there for master mood, the slave is an object/useful being with the purpose of others favors.

The exploitation of the primitivism placed outside the geographic space of developed society

At this point somebody might think about the opposite idea of western much easier life than the rest of the world or the former centuries. Emigration to western centuries seems a good reason for this idea. Indeed contemporary western life is full of holydays and parties or pushy jobs are rare now. It is true that some west European countries that have a very advanced protection to homeless people. Nevertheless this communitarian effort is sensed on the back of the others who work to support unemployed besides supporting the huge bureaucracy and politicians. So if one part of community gets this standard of living there is another part needed for support. Unfortunately most of nowadays slaves are originated outside the western geographic space as emigrants and this is the price of “modern freedom”.

The mirage of western life excited the uncivilized world and keeps doing it. Emigration is a consequence of this fact. In the “developed” modern society the harder jobs are made by emigrants. On the other hand the main hard work that western slave used to do is now made by the eastern one in her/his own country. The western slave way to laziness is open due to this crossing work to countries like India and China. The former western slave is a paid unemployed and the eastern one is a much underpaid employer. These people accept working conditions similar to the 17-18 century so the western corporations prefer them instead of western workers.

I pointed in my work “Extirpation of vampires” that when a western corporation gets into a classical and primitive community then a devastator thing happen. The people that this company hires are artificial turned into modern people. They are thrown right in the middle of contemporary life problems without having a natural way of protection and defend against them. From outside this potential corporation seems to be the heaven from the sky to the community bringing prosperity and cleaning poverty for some of the citizens at least. But at a closer look things are much far from this. The primitive people are not poor. The poverty is a reality specific to the “developed” modern society. The subsistence state is natural to primitive life so it has a natural mechanism of defense and integration into the wild environment. The poverty becomes reality to such community when the lies of “developed” modern society get in. The primitive person accepts as an inexperienced child this terrified transmutation into the modernity as the child accepts to jump out of the window in 5 minute in return for a candy. But just like a child the primitive person will pay a hard price for this naivety. The emptiness is one of such terrible choice. Let’s just find some clues for this situation. Let’s imagine that after such a corporatist intrusion some native people will contact a disease. The ones that are hired for that corporation will be treated inside the company or sent for treatment somewhere else. But what would happen to the ones that are not? It is possible that the company will pay for the medication for all the people. But, anyway, this is the start of splitting community. But the clearest sign for this is the tensioned relationship between the employed that adapts to the western modern way of life and unemployed who just would become poor. Their social status would dramatically change from normal people in a primitive society to poor and deceived into a strange combination of primitive and modern society. The envy pointed to the employed made them very hated. They would accept even a smaller payment for the job and even the rights that others had in the first place will eventually diminish. The unemployed envy for the employee and the employee’s contempt for the unemployed are the ingredients for a beautiful splitting community.

The weight of western civilization seems to move slowly but surely on the eastern people thanks to their own envy and desires about western way of life. But the problem is not solved. The garbage is just putted a little bit farther from western world. But the world is getting global, it is transforming slowly but surely into an international village and it won't take long until this garbage will smell to the other parts of world. The “developed” modern society shouldn’t close its eyes about this problem and should find solutions very quickly because the future terrorists might came from India and China one day.

The advanced parasitical tools of primitivism by the “developed” modern society

The “developed” modern society doesn’t have such a visible authoritarian system but, don't worry, a country like China that transformed lately into the place of modern slaves do perfectly this job. Western wealth uses a lot the eastern authoritarian political systems. The classical slavery might be forbidden on western human rights states but is allowed in other places. The torture might be forbidden on western human rights states but it is very useful in other places and planes. Anyway, it is clear that the “developed” modern society could not work without authoritarianism. The western people are not far away from classical slavery. It is just that the modern slavery is much uman than the classical one. But it still exists. Ju$tice is the best example for this statement even if it protects the common people against abuses made by others. But, as every mafia system, the Ju$tice does not protect common people from the system thievery. That shows the real intensions of Ju$tice. Ju$tice mine intentions are not protecting common people from street thieves but rehabilitating them, convincing them to give up thievery and produce something instead. The “rehabilitation” of thieves used by system is meant actually to enlarge the budget for the neofeudals banquets.

The common people are highly and efficiently manipulated to pay the services of politicians or other descendents of old feudalism without even see it. S/He is forced to buy their (un)services without any choice. The ju$tice and the rest of resources of authoritarian state is purely ruthless about not paying the protection taxes by the slaves. It is clear that the ju$tice only occasionally protects somebody by other common persons abuses but always punish that one who does not accept with the smile on the face the authorities rubbery. The skills and the manipulation of making this are just perfect. Few people realize that because few people are actually putted to jail for not paying taxes. But one cannot get a legal job without doing this because the firm that person works for is forced to pay it to neofeudal system. So, the protection taxes are not directly paid by the employee but the employer with the work in exchange for money deal. Only when that firm refuses this payment then the manager, the employer could be sent to jail. But this would be crazy! The manager prefers to send this weight on the employee’s work than getting busted. The taxes that employer has to pay upper on mafia social hierarchy could be recovered with pressure on the employee. The employee’s work is harder this way and this extra work never gets back to common people but is just wasted behind politicians closed portals … pardon, I meant… doors. The mafia social system steals from honest common people with this roguish mechanism so none could actually see. Doing a job harder than civilization and technology allows with its resources means actually keeping in the dark (age).

Somebody could only refuse to work but with the risk of social marginalization. Somebody won’t directly be sent to jail after this but the punishment is prohibition of a very natural and basic right: that of having business relationship with the other members of society. One would not be part of this any more. One could not be accepted in the human family and take advantage of enlightened minds that created technology and made modern life easier. The mafia system of “developed” modern society rules that. One needs its approbation for being a part of civilization in exchange for its job slavery and protection tax payment just like the classical nobles approved or denied their marriage and their life. Now ju$tice takes a very good care of that.

The old conception about justice as a reparation meant to correct an abuse is a very big lie. Hamurabi, the eastern king that remained in history as the first maker and user of a laws code, did it because wanted to be clear understood by his suborders. The justice has not change much since then. The difference between modern and ancient justice is to be found in the invested resources for good looking, for convincing those who are abused by its power that all it does is actually protection. In fact, during the centuries the justice only perfected that basic goal of abusing the slave’s in the master’s favor. So-called (by official culture) sophists saw very clearly that the laws are a kind of spider net that flies get caught in and the biggest get trough it.

I want to be clear understood; I don’t have a problem with accepting that the justice is the engine of social system. It is just that I believe it is also savageness like the low of a jungle. The thief and the modern criminal that justice pretends to punish for its “uncivilized” acts has the same primitive right to act like this as justice does. The difference between that criminality and justice relies in the bigger power that justice has. The common criminal uses small weapons and the justice uses helicopters, big rifles or even tanks. It is just because the “developed” modern society uses so much the primitive resources the reason that it cannot be called “civilized”, “moral” or “right”. We are stack with cars devices, machines and we barely stand them anymore but we are centuries far from being a real human civilization in a sense of good selfesteem that western culture made about it.

The way system works is unbelievable. This entire rubbery can be cleaned up and legitimate if the slaves are kept in primitive mentality just like killing animals for human race surviving. The protection tax can be perceived into payment for the (un)services of turning the primitives slaves into civilized persons. The culture of elegant manners very efficiently knows how to anathematize the primitive roughness. “You are brainless and blind but I will make you smart and agile in exchange for your slavery”: that is the social symbiosis between primitivism and modernity in the “developed” modern society. Is it just me or the Christian Colonialists did the same thing some centuries ago with the pagans?

The cultural and psychopathological consequences of social splitting due to primitive exploitation by the “developed” modern society

It is obvious that if one was born as a slave than the system works to keep her/him that way just like some beggars that physically mutilate their children for their future begging “success”. But if these so called parents are still isolate cases the “developed” modern society does it systematically with their spiritual mutilated slaves. The open education, the equality of chances are very big and deceptive lies meant for keeping up the slaves self esteem and making them more profitable.

The “developed” modern society is too much studded with primitivism and couldn’t be reasonable called civilized, moral or right. We are full of devices and technology that almost got sick of but we are still very far from being a civilization in a way of good auto respect that it culturally developed.

The human being is the most sick and depressive among the other creatures on the earth. The nature has the right answers for the ugly things of wild and primitive life/civilization because the nature feeds back to itself. But the surviving primitivism into “developed” modern society is thousands of times more terrifying and shocking than the ugliest natural fact. The hyenas sometimes eat their pray alive witch is not a very pleasant death. But still in this cases the pray pain is minimized by their anesthetic body secretions. However this nightmare takes from 10-20 minutes till one or maximum two days. Because of their short memory the most part of prays life is harmoniously. Unfortunately the depression that “developed” modern society developed during centuries in the majority of people is a pain that takes dozens and dozens of years. Only the drugs and a huge entertainment system can temperate this terrible cultural sufferance.

That is the big picture of “developed” modern society that uses primitivism for a “better life” for some people when the others fight hard for their life. Their Cartesian elitism is just a cynical way of using such crude reality. The system washes even their guilt feelings. They are the spoiled ones of modern society because their descendents are the old aristocracy and colonialists. Their corporatist mentality that comes from the old war rubbers seems to be out of nature. They became some kind of Cyborgs impossible by any chance to be taken back to the human, nature or life family. Their mess made to human nature is like a cancer to world conscience. This people forgot to be human, they live for self-image only, they live for cleaning their traces only, they live for statistics only and don’t know to live otherwise than lying, manipulating and finally by stealing with advanced tools of modern state.

Untrusting the metanarations is specific for the modern and contemporary culture. Only one thing is unquestionable as a universal truth: the fact that there are slaves and they should stay that way because otherwise the “free people” wouldn‘t be free any more. In deed nobody doubts about it. But if somebody comes and says that the advanced thievery of politicians are basically the same with that made by street thieves that go to jail then the culture does its job of guard dog. The culture than says that there is not a definition of truth so there might be no troth at all so the upper statement cannot be proved. So it won’t make any sense because the fact of truth is no sense. That is what I call advanced culture! Thanks god that nobody study it in primary class! But there is no place for other stuff than universal truths! There an invisible and omnipotent god is needed for people to blindly believe in and to project that image into master person so to accept its thievery as offering. There are religion needed for projection it into supermarket things and divinize them so the primitive person should be a good consumer. Indeed the “developed” modern society needs so mach primitive society for cleaning up! For now that is the picture of so called civilization.

The modern political system works in the same way as mafia

2009-01-21T04:49:00.000-08:00

In romaneste aici:

In the modern society, as the previous ones, the taxes are not basically meant to serve the community. It is true that a part of such founds goes back for solving the community’s needs. But these things actually happen only after the social privileged ones are paid and after their car drivers and their home servers are paid. These salaries are the most interest of modern political system and they are paid no matter what they do for the community interest. Only if there are other founds left after this “sharing” then some of them may go back to community for creating the illusion that the politicians are some kind of servants, some kind of administrators of community hired by people as an employee is hired by an employer. But if after this originate corruption there is no much left for deceiving sight of people with some good actions for helping the community then the situation would look very much like South America oligarchy. I am very sure that G. Bush, Bill Clinton and other are not better and more honest than Saddam Hussein or Fidel Castro but it is the American people that have more experience in building capitalism than the Cuban and Iraqi people. American people are more productive and send more founds to the main budget so the politicians and their covered up can afford to be more human.

It is very clear that after creating a bureaucracy, after creating a lot of institutions meant to restrict politicians’ power one another the main budget will never go back untouched in community. All the modern taxes are the modern cosmetic shape of dark edge and ancient slavery. Modern slave needs some kind of freedom and a lot of illusion of freedom for being productive. Modern slave is a creative slave. Routine hard working of dark edge and ancient slavery are now made with technology. Of course a slave is still a slave no matter if ancient or modern and that self esteem will bring down the modern slave. But don’t worry! The system imagined a solution for this! The sleepy story of “social contract” signed between the politicians and the citizen who don’t have time for implying in politics is perfect for shaping up the modern slave. Only that I for one don’t remember signing such a contract; I must had been sleeping or had been drunk when signing such a paper because it is not good for me. Let’s just say that I didn’t sign at all such a fraud and now I just complain about it. I am not that stupid to sign a contract that says I agree for paying politicians palaces when I know I could do better than they do. I don’t think so! I wouldn’t sign for such a mess, but who cares… Anyway I still have the power of seeing to politicians lies and show them who they really are: the mafia.

A democratic politics doesn’t mean that the politicians come with their armies to take the skin out of the poor; to parasite those people in order to create big fortunes and then creating for them with culture the illusion that they are free. A real democratic politics means convincing the citizen to donate a part of her/his political and financial power for the wealth of community, for building that particular bridge, for sustaining a certain project. I see in a real democratic politics the citizen power of saying NO as s/he says to some products at the store. If I don’t need a certain product then I just won’t buy. I improvise. When the political system would work in this way then one could say that politics works for the benefit of citizen. No system in the world work entirely like this today but just in a smaller and insignificant part. It is more comfortable to pretend to work and none ask about your work. It is easier working under no pressure behind the closed doors with an ironical and cynical attitude towards the stressed slave from the street that work to death to survive. The social privileged ones are the followers of old robbers of helpless communities. They just brought to perfection the skill of deceiving and robbery. They build their empires doing this.

There is a saying that none can escape from death and taxes. It is not quite a saying but just a political deception meant to connect taxes by something natural as death. This trick is meant to make slave believe that there is nothing better than tipping the politicians in exchange for an expensive pathetic mockery. But it is easy to see that the politicians do not pay any taxes whatsoever even if it looks like. The fact is that the politician does not produce anything real that people can use. The politician helped by media just creates some illusions to people and deceiving after getting the power. In fact the politicians pay taxes from the taxes that the system takes from the poor and transfers to t heir pockets. The trick sounds like “Give me all of you one dollar each and I will return you back one dollar for all”. It looks like a fair exchange but it is a fraud because people actually pay for lies. The political system makes this fraud with a fabulous accuracy. The politicians just parasites honest people. The only job that politicians have is that of making system do the dirty work for them. That job is focused on ling, deceiving, absorbing people’s trust and creating an artificial optimism among slaves.

The modern politician does not even representing the citizen’s political will even so manipulated by media and education. The most important political actions are very slightly influenced by those that people vote for. And if some time to time the voted politician takes some action in the favor of citizen then the system fights back with procedures and other tricks and in short time “the solution” of “people’s hero” would become inefficient any more for the main issue. This “democracy” is just piece of paper. The citizen does not even imagine where real political actions take place. The vote and are just empty facts. Barrack Obama looks very attractive in the eyes of American slaves. It wouldn’t seem real that some parasite another ones in modern society when “the most powerful man on the planet” is a black person. The fact that some centuries ago in America were slavery is almost invisible comparing to such an “historical event”. Well, at least it seems really impossible for slavery to exist any more since one of the former slaves became “the master of masters”. See, there are no more slaves anymore! They run for and win the presidencies, acts in movies, become stars. The American people dramatically lost its trust in political system and such a political offer is meant to rebuilt it ant motivate it for another four more years. Anyway there was a Plan B in case of Obama’s failure; the system hided freemasonry prepared the first woman president in US history. Wow! Wouldn’t you like take part of history?

So the politician is only a spender but not an employee. The politicians produce just illusions in citizen’s mind that something good might happen with a superfaceal change. For the slave that would mean happiness and motivation in being more productive in the factory. But this is still nothing as a fact because the slave always accepts the master will. So this fact seems like a vicious circle. But for the person that doesn’t want to be a slave and doesn’t need optimism and ideals that doesn’t mean anything. I sell very hard my freedom so I don’t need politician’s optimistic speech. I don’t need optimism so I don’t need politicians.

It is not only that the politician does not produce something really useful for community but its presence produces artificial conflicts within it as remarkable Adam Curtis pointed in the best political documentary I ever seen: „The power of nightmairs”. Actions like this of creating nightmares are very specific to mafia. In order to collect its protection tax mafia first arranges a bad situation for you and after this it is the one that “saves” you. After the communism and traditional enemy collapse politicians showed us the new “evil axis”. And for sure there will always be other nightmares for common people as long as there will be politicians and their army that protect them and create an godlike image on the Earth.